Conformal Counterfactual Inference under Hidden Confounding
2405.12387
0
0
🤯
Abstract
Personalized decision making requires the knowledge of potential outcomes under different treatments, and confidence intervals about the potential outcomes further enrich this decision-making process and improve its reliability in high-stakes scenarios. Predicting potential outcomes along with its uncertainty in a counterfactual world poses the foundamental challenge in causal inference. Existing methods that construct confidence intervals for counterfactuals either rely on the assumption of strong ignorability, or need access to un-identifiable lower and upper bounds that characterize the difference between observational and interventional distributions. To overcome these limitations, we first propose a novel approach wTCP-DR based on transductive weighted conformal prediction, which provides confidence intervals for counterfactual outcomes with marginal converage guarantees, even under hidden confounding. With less restrictive assumptions, our approach requires access to a fraction of interventional data (from randomized controlled trials) to account for the covariate shift from observational distributoin to interventional distribution. Theoretical results explicitly demonstrate the conditions under which our algorithm is strictly advantageous to the naive method that only uses interventional data. After ensuring valid intervals on counterfactuals, it is straightforward to construct intervals for individual treatment effects (ITEs). We demonstrate our method across synthetic and real-world data, including recommendation systems, to verify the superiority of our methods compared against state-of-the-art baselines in terms of both coverage and efficiency
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel approach called wTCP-DR to construct confidence intervals for counterfactual outcomes, even in the presence of hidden confounding.
- Existing methods either rely on strong assumptions like ignorability or need access to unidentifiable bounds on the difference between observational and interventional distributions.
- The wTCP-DR method uses a fraction of interventional data (from randomized controlled trials) to account for the covariate shift between observational and interventional distributions.
- The approach provides marginal coverage guarantees for counterfactual confidence intervals and can be used to construct intervals for individual treatment effects (ITEs).
Plain English Explanation
When making important decisions, it's crucial to understand the potential outcomes under different choices and have confidence in those predictions. This is the core challenge in causal inference, where we try to infer the effects of actions in a "counterfactual" world - what would have happened if we had taken a different course of action.
Existing methods for constructing confidence intervals around these counterfactual predictions either rely on strong assumptions, like ignorability, or require access to information that is difficult to obtain, like the precise differences between observational and interventional data distributions.
To overcome these limitations, the researchers propose a new approach called wTCP-DR, which stands for "transductive weighted conformal prediction with doubly robust estimation." This method uses a small amount of data from randomized controlled trials, along with observational data, to build reliable confidence intervals for counterfactual outcomes, even when there are hidden factors influencing the data.
The key idea is to leverage the information from the randomized trial data to account for the shift in the data distribution when transitioning from observational to interventional settings. This allows the method to provide robust, guaranteed coverage of the true counterfactual outcomes, which is crucial for making high-stakes decisions with confidence.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the wTCP-DR algorithm, which is a novel approach to constructing confidence intervals for counterfactual outcomes. Existing methods, such as those based on conformal prediction or doubly robust estimation, either rely on strong assumptions like ignorability or require access to unidentifiable bounds on the difference between observational and interventional distributions.
To overcome these limitations, the wTCP-DR method leverages a small amount of interventional data (from randomized controlled trials) to account for the covariate shift between the observational and interventional distributions. Specifically, the algorithm uses transductive weighted conformal prediction, which provides marginal coverage guarantees for the counterfactual confidence intervals, even in the presence of hidden confounding.
The theoretical analysis in the paper explicitly demonstrates the conditions under which the wTCP-DR approach is advantageous compared to a naive method that only uses interventional data. After constructing valid counterfactual intervals, the authors show how to straightforwardly extend the approach to obtain confidence intervals for individual treatment effects (ITEs).
The authors evaluate their method on both synthetic and real-world datasets, including a recommendation system application, and show the superiority of wTCP-DR compared to state-of-the-art baselines in terms of coverage and efficiency.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to the challenging problem of constructing reliable confidence intervals for counterfactual outcomes, which is crucial for making informed, high-stakes decisions. The key strength of the wTCP-DR method is its ability to provide marginal coverage guarantees while relaxing the strong assumptions required by existing techniques.
One potential limitation, as acknowledged by the authors, is the need for a small amount of interventional data from randomized controlled trials. In some real-world scenarios, such data may be difficult or expensive to obtain. The authors suggest that further research is needed to explore the minimum amount of interventional data required for the method to be effective.
Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for the wTCP-DR approach to be sensitive to model misspecification or other sources of error in the observational and interventional data. It would be valuable to explore the robustness of the method to these types of challenges, which are often encountered in practical applications.
Overall, the wTCP-DR algorithm represents an important contribution to the field of causal inference, providing a novel and promising solution to the critical problem of constructing reliable counterfactual predictions. As the authors suggest, further research and real-world evaluations will be valuable in assessing the broader applicability and limitations of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel algorithm called wTCP-DR that addresses a fundamental challenge in causal inference: predicting potential outcomes and their uncertainty in a counterfactual world. The key innovation of the wTCP-DR method is its ability to provide marginal coverage guarantees for counterfactual confidence intervals, even in the presence of hidden confounding, by leveraging a small amount of interventional data from randomized controlled trials.
By relaxing the strong assumptions required by existing techniques, the wTCP-DR approach represents an important step forward in enabling reliable, personalized decision-making in high-stakes scenarios. The theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations presented in the paper demonstrate the superiority of this method compared to state-of-the-art baselines.
As the authors note, further research is needed to explore the minimum amount of interventional data required and the method's robustness to potential sources of error. Nevertheless, the wTCP-DR algorithm stands as a significant contribution to the field of causal inference, paving the way for more informed and confident decision-making in a wide range of real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🗣️
Counterfactual Generative Models for Time-Varying Treatments
Shenghao Wu, Wenbin Zhou, Minshuo Chen, Shixiang Zhu
0
0
Estimating the counterfactual outcome of treatment is essential for decision-making in public health and clinical science, among others. Often, treatments are administered in a sequential, time-varying manner, leading to an exponentially increased number of possible counterfactual outcomes. Furthermore, in modern applications, the outcomes are high-dimensional and conventional average treatment effect estimation fails to capture disparities in individuals. To tackle these challenges, we propose a novel conditional generative framework capable of producing counterfactual samples under time-varying treatment, without the need for explicit density estimation. Our method carefully addresses the distribution mismatch between the observed and counterfactual distributions via a loss function based on inverse probability re-weighting, and supports integration with state-of-the-art conditional generative models such as the guided diffusion and conditional variational autoencoder. We present a thorough evaluation of our method using both synthetic and real-world data. Our results demonstrate that our method is capable of generating high-quality counterfactual samples and outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines.
6/18/2024
Revisiting Counterfactual Regression through the Lens of Gromov-Wasserstein Information Bottleneck
Hao Yang, Zexu Sun, Hongteng Xu, Xu Chen
0
0
As a promising individualized treatment effect (ITE) estimation method, counterfactual regression (CFR) maps individuals' covariates to a latent space and predicts their counterfactual outcomes. However, the selection bias between control and treatment groups often imbalances the two groups' latent distributions and negatively impacts this method's performance. In this study, we revisit counterfactual regression through the lens of information bottleneck and propose a novel learning paradigm called Gromov-Wasserstein information bottleneck (GWIB). In this paradigm, we learn CFR by maximizing the mutual information between covariates' latent representations and outcomes while penalizing the kernelized mutual information between the latent representations and the covariates. We demonstrate that the upper bound of the penalty term can be implemented as a new regularizer consisting of $i)$ the fused Gromov-Wasserstein distance between the latent representations of different groups and $ii)$ the gap between the transport cost generated by the model and the cross-group Gromov-Wasserstein distance between the latent representations and the covariates. GWIB effectively learns the CFR model through alternating optimization, suppressing selection bias while avoiding trivial latent distributions. Experiments on ITE estimation tasks show that GWIB consistently outperforms state-of-the-art CFR methods. To promote the research community, we release our project at https://github.com/peteryang1031/Causal-GWIB.
5/27/2024
🤯
Conformal Convolution and Monte Carlo Meta-learners for Predictive Inference of Individual Treatment Effects
Jef Jonkers, Jarne Verhaeghe, Glenn Van Wallendael, Luc Duchateau, Sofie Van Hoecke
0
0
Knowledge of the effect of interventions, known as the treatment effect, is paramount for decision-making. Approaches to estimating this treatment effect using conditional average treatment effect (CATE) meta-learners often provide only a point estimate of this treatment effect, while additional uncertainty quantification is frequently desired to enhance decision-making confidence. To address this, we introduce two novel approaches: the conformal convolution T-learner (CCT-learner) and conformal Monte Carlo (CMC) meta-learners. The approaches leverage weighted conformal predictive systems (WCPS), Monte Carlo sampling, and CATE meta-learners to generate predictive distributions of individual treatment effect (ITE) that could enhance individualized decision-making. Although we show how assumptions about the noise distribution of the outcome influence the uncertainty predictions, our experiments demonstrate that the CCT- and CMC meta-learners achieve strong coverage while maintaining narrow interval widths. They also generate probabilistically calibrated predictive distributions, providing reliable ranges of ITEs across various synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets. Code: https://github.com/predict-idlab/cct-cmc
6/13/2024
Causal Contrastive Learning for Counterfactual Regression Over Time
Mouad El Bouchattaoui, Myriam Tami, Benoit Lepetit, Paul-Henry Courn`ede
0
0
Estimating treatment effects over time holds significance in various domains, including precision medicine, epidemiology, economy, and marketing. This paper introduces a unique approach to counterfactual regression over time, emphasizing long-term predictions. Distinguishing itself from existing models like Causal Transformer, our approach highlights the efficacy of employing RNNs for long-term forecasting, complemented by Contrastive Predictive Coding (CPC) and Information Maximization (InfoMax). Emphasizing efficiency, we avoid the need for computationally expensive transformers. Leveraging CPC, our method captures long-term dependencies in the presence of time-varying confounders. Notably, recent models have disregarded the importance of invertible representation, compromising identification assumptions. To remedy this, we employ the InfoMax principle, maximizing a lower bound of mutual information between sequence data and its representation. Our method achieves state-of-the-art counterfactual estimation results using both synthetic and real-world data, marking the pioneering incorporation of Contrastive Predictive Encoding in causal inference.
7/2/2024