Doubly Robust Inference in Causal Latent Factor Models
2402.11652
0
0
Abstract
This article introduces a new estimator of average treatment effects under unobserved confounding in modern data-rich environments featuring large numbers of units and outcomes. The proposed estimator is doubly robust, combining outcome imputation, inverse probability weighting, and a novel cross-fitting procedure for matrix completion. We derive finite-sample and asymptotic guarantees, and show that the error of the new estimator converges to a mean-zero Gaussian distribution at a parametric rate. Simulation results demonstrate the practical relevance of the formal properties of the estimators analyzed in this article.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a novel method for causally attributing changes in outcomes to multiple potential sources of variation
- Proposes a "multiply robust" approach that can handle various types of confounding
- Demonstrates the approach on several real-world datasets and simulation experiments
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new technique for understanding why outcomes change over time or between groups. Often, there are multiple potential factors that could be causing these changes, such as changes in the underlying population, changes in the way data is collected, or the introduction of a new intervention.
The proposed approach aims to disentangle the causal effects of these different factors. It does this in a "multiply robust" way, meaning the method is designed to work even if certain assumptions about the data are violated. This is important because real-world data is messy and the true causal structure is often unknown.
The authors demonstrate their method on several examples, including examining how changes in the representation of units in survey data can induce biases and combining experimental and observational data to estimate causal effects. Overall, the paper provides a flexible and robust tool for understanding the drivers of changes in outcomes, which can be valuable across many domains.
Technical Explanation
The key idea is to model the causal process generating the observed data as a function of multiple "sources of variation" - factors that could be responsible for changes in the outcome over time or between groups. These sources could include changes in the underlying population, changes in data collection methods, or the introduction of a new intervention.
The proposed multiply robust attribution method estimates the causal effect of each source by constructing doubly robust estimators that can handle different types of confounding. This means the estimators remain consistent even if certain modeling assumptions are violated, as long as at least one of the necessary assumptions holds.
The authors show how this approach can be used to address challenges like representation-induced confounding bias and to combine experimental and observational data to estimate causal effects. They also present a more general causal representation learning framework that can handle cases with complex causal structures.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a valuable contribution by providing a flexible and robust framework for attributing changes in outcomes to multiple potential causal factors. The authors carefully consider various challenges that can arise in real-world settings, such as confounding and the need to combine different data sources.
That said, the proposed methods do rely on some modeling assumptions, and the authors acknowledge that violations of these assumptions could lead to biased results. Additionally, the computational complexity of the algorithms may be a practical limitation, especially as the number of sources of variation increases.
Further research could explore ways to relax the required assumptions, improve the computational efficiency, and provide guidelines for model selection and hyperparameter tuning. It would also be interesting to see applications of this work in more diverse domains beyond the examples provided in the paper.
Overall, this research represents a promising step towards better understanding the causal drivers of changes in complex systems, with important implications for policy, decision-making, and scientific discovery.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel "multiply robust" approach for causally attributing changes in outcomes to multiple potential sources of variation. The method is designed to be flexible and reliable, even when faced with various challenges like confounding and the need to combine different data sources.
The authors demonstrate the practical utility of their approach through several real-world examples and simulation studies. While the proposed techniques do rely on some modeling assumptions, this work represents an important step forward in the field of causal inference, with the potential to yield valuable insights across a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Tutorial on Doubly Robust Learning for Causal Inference
Hlynur Dav'i{dh} Hlynsson
0
0
Doubly robust learning offers a robust framework for causal inference from observational data by integrating propensity score and outcome modeling. Despite its theoretical appeal, practical adoption remains limited due to perceived complexity and inaccessible software. This tutorial aims to demystify doubly robust methods and demonstrate their application using the EconML package. We provide an introduction to causal inference, discuss the principles of outcome modeling and propensity scores, and illustrate the doubly robust approach through simulated case studies. By simplifying the methodology and offering practical coding examples, we intend to make doubly robust learning accessible to researchers and practitioners in data science and statistics.
6/4/2024
š¤Æ
Simultaneous inference for generalized linear models with unmeasured confounders
Jin-Hong Du, Larry Wasserman, Kathryn Roeder
0
0
Tens of thousands of simultaneous hypothesis tests are routinely performed in genomic studies to identify differentially expressed genes. However, due to unmeasured confounders, many standard statistical approaches may be substantially biased. This paper investigates the large-scale hypothesis testing problem for multivariate generalized linear models in the presence of confounding effects. Under arbitrary confounding mechanisms, we propose a unified statistical estimation and inference framework that harnesses orthogonal structures and integrates linear projections into three key stages. It begins by disentangling marginal and uncorrelated confounding effects to recover the latent coefficients. Subsequently, latent factors and primary effects are jointly estimated through lasso-type optimization. Finally, we incorporate projected and weighted bias-correction steps for hypothesis testing. Theoretically, we establish the identification conditions of various effects and non-asymptotic error bounds. We show effective Type-I error control of asymptotic $z$-tests as sample and response sizes approach infinity. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed method controls the false discovery rate by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure and is more powerful than alternative methods. By comparing single-cell RNA-seq counts from two groups of samples, we demonstrate the suitability of adjusting confounding effects when significant covariates are absent from the model.
4/23/2024
š
Graph Machine Learning based Doubly Robust Estimator for Network Causal Effects
Seyedeh Baharan Khatami, Harsh Parikh, Haowei Chen, Sudeepa Roy, Babak Salimi
0
0
We address the challenge of inferring causal effects in social network data. This results in challenges due to interference -- where a unit's outcome is affected by neighbors' treatments -- and network-induced confounding factors. While there is extensive literature focusing on estimating causal effects in social network setups, a majority of them make prior assumptions about the form of network-induced confounding mechanisms. Such strong assumptions are rarely likely to hold especially in high-dimensional networks. We propose a novel methodology that combines graph machine learning approaches with the double machine learning framework to enable accurate and efficient estimation of direct and peer effects using a single observational social network. We demonstrate the semiparametric efficiency of our proposed estimator under mild regularity conditions, allowing for consistent uncertainty quantification. We demonstrate that our method is accurate, robust, and scalable via an extensive simulation study. We use our method to investigate the impact of Self-Help Group participation on financial risk tolerance.
6/4/2024
š¤Æ
Constrained Learning for Causal Inference and Semiparametric Statistics
Tiffany Tianhui Cai, Yuri Fonseca, Kaiwen Hou, Hongseok Namkoong
0
0
Causal estimation (e.g. of the average treatment effect) requires estimating complex nuisance parameters (e.g. outcome models). To adjust for errors in nuisance parameter estimation, we present a novel correction method that solves for the best plug-in estimator under the constraint that the first-order error of the estimator with respect to the nuisance parameter estimate is zero. Our constrained learning framework provides a unifying perspective to prominent first-order correction approaches including one-step estimation (a.k.a. augmented inverse probability weighting) and targeting (a.k.a. targeted maximum likelihood estimation). Our semiparametric inference approach, which we call the C-Learner, can be implemented with modern machine learning methods such as neural networks and tree ensembles, and enjoys standard guarantees like semiparametric efficiency and double robustness. Empirically, we demonstrate our approach on several datasets, including those with text features that require fine-tuning language models. We observe the C-Learner matches or outperforms other asymptotically optimal estimators, with better performance in settings with less estimated overlap.
5/24/2024