Towards Characterizing Domain Counterfactuals For Invertible Latent Causal Models
2306.11281
0
0
Abstract
Answering counterfactual queries has important applications such as explainability, robustness, and fairness but is challenging when the causal variables are unobserved and the observations are non-linear mixtures of these latent variables, such as pixels in images. One approach is to recover the latent Structural Causal Model (SCM), which may be infeasible in practice due to requiring strong assumptions, e.g., linearity of the causal mechanisms or perfect atomic interventions. Meanwhile, more practical ML-based approaches using naive domain translation models to generate counterfactual samples lack theoretical grounding and may construct invalid counterfactuals. In this work, we strive to strike a balance between practicality and theoretical guarantees by analyzing a specific type of causal query called domain counterfactuals, which hypothesizes what a sample would have looked like if it had been generated in a different domain (or environment). We show that recovering the latent SCM is unnecessary for estimating domain counterfactuals, thereby sidestepping some of the theoretic challenges. By assuming invertibility and sparsity of intervention, we prove domain counterfactual estimation error can be bounded by a data fit term and intervention sparsity term. Building upon our theoretical results, we develop a theoretically grounded practical algorithm that simplifies the modeling process to generative model estimation under autoregressive and shared parameter constraints that enforce intervention sparsity. Finally, we show an improvement in counterfactual estimation over baseline methods through extensive simulated and image-based experiments.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores methods for characterizing "domain counterfactuals" in the context of invertible latent causal models.
- Domain counterfactuals refer to plausible changes that can be made to the input data while preserving the underlying causal structure.
- The research aims to develop techniques for probing and understanding the space of possible counterfactual inputs for a given model.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you have a machine learning model that can understand the causal relationships in some data, like images of people. Benchmarking Counterfactual Image Generation is one example of this type of model. The model might learn that certain features, like hairstyle or clothing, are causally related to other features, like gender or age.
Now, let's say you want to understand how the model would react if you changed certain aspects of the input, while keeping the underlying causal structure the same. For example, what would the model predict if you took an image of a person and changed their hair color, but kept their facial features the same? This type of "counterfactual" change is the focus of this research.
The key idea is to find ways to systematically explore the space of possible counterfactual inputs that the model might find plausible, given its understanding of the causal relationships in the data. By doing so, you can gain deeper insights into how the model works and potentially uncover biases or limitations in its causal reasoning.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the concept of "domain counterfactuals" within the context of invertible latent causal models. These are models that can learn the underlying causal structure of data, like the relationships between different visual features in images, and then use that knowledge to generate new, plausible-looking samples.
The researchers propose methods for characterizing the space of possible domain counterfactuals for a given input and model. This involves leveraging the invertibility of the model to efficiently explore the latent space and identify regions that correspond to counterfactual inputs that preserve the causal structure.
The paper demonstrates the application of these techniques on several benchmark datasets, showing how they can be used to probe the model's understanding of causal relationships and potentially uncover biases or limitations. For example, the methods could be used to investigate intersectional social biases in vision models or generate counterfactual explanations for detecting face forgery.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach for characterizing the space of plausible counterfactual inputs for invertible latent causal models. By focusing on the domain of the input data, rather than just the latent space, the researchers argue that their techniques can uncover more meaningful and interpretable insights about the model's causal understanding.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations of the proposed methods. For instance, the techniques may not work as well for models with highly complex or non-linear causal structures, as the invertibility assumption may not hold. Additionally, the paper suggests that further research is needed to better understand the relationship between the identified domain counterfactuals and the actual causal relationships learned by the model.
Another potential concern is the risk of these techniques being used to generate adversarial counterfactuals that could be used to mislead or manipulate the model's outputs. The researchers acknowledge this possibility and suggest that future work should explore ways to mitigate such misuse.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for characterizing the space of plausible domain counterfactuals for invertible latent causal models. By enabling a deeper understanding of the causal relationships learned by these models, the proposed techniques could lead to improved model interpretability, robustness, and fairness. The methods could be particularly useful for probing and mitigating biases in vision and other AI systems that rely on causal reasoning. While the paper highlights some limitations and areas for further research, the overall contribution is a significant step forward in the quest to view the process of generating counterfactuals as a source of knowledge about complex machine learning models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Framework for Feasible Counterfactual Exploration incorporating Causality, Sparsity and Density
Kleopatra Markou, Dimitrios Tomaras, Vana Kalogeraki, Dimitrios Gunopulos
0
0
The imminent need to interpret the output of a Machine Learning model with counterfactual (CF) explanations - via small perturbations to the input - has been notable in the research community. Although the variety of CF examples is important, the aspect of them being feasible at the same time, does not necessarily apply in their entirety. This work uses different benchmark datasets to examine through the preservation of the logical causal relations of their attributes, whether CF examples can be generated after a small amount of changes to the original input, be feasible and actually useful to the end-user in a real-world case. To achieve this, we used a black box model as a classifier, to distinguish the desired from the input class and a Variational Autoencoder (VAE) to generate feasible CF examples. As an extension, we also extracted two-dimensional manifolds (one for each dataset) that located the majority of the feasible examples, a representation that adequately distinguished them from infeasible ones. For our experimentation we used three commonly used datasets and we managed to generate feasible and at the same time sparse, CF examples that satisfy all possible predefined causal constraints, by confirming their importance with the attributes in a dataset.
4/23/2024
📉
From Identifiable Causal Representations to Controllable Counterfactual Generation: A Survey on Causal Generative Modeling
Aneesh Komanduri, Xintao Wu, Yongkai Wu, Feng Chen
0
0
Deep generative models have shown tremendous capability in data density estimation and data generation from finite samples. While these models have shown impressive performance by learning correlations among features in the data, some fundamental shortcomings are their lack of explainability, tendency to induce spurious correlations, and poor out-of-distribution extrapolation. To remedy such challenges, recent work has proposed a shift toward causal generative models. Causal models offer several beneficial properties to deep generative models, such as distribution shift robustness, fairness, and interpretability. Structural causal models (SCMs) describe data-generating processes and model complex causal relationships and mechanisms among variables in a system. Thus, SCMs can naturally be combined with deep generative models. We provide a technical survey on causal generative modeling categorized into causal representation learning and controllable counterfactual generation methods. We focus on fundamental theory, methodology, drawbacks, datasets, and metrics. Then, we cover applications of causal generative models in fairness, privacy, out-of-distribution generalization, precision medicine, and biological sciences. Lastly, we discuss open problems and fruitful research directions for future work in the field.
5/24/2024
🤯
Conformal Counterfactual Inference under Hidden Confounding
Zonghao Chen, Ruocheng Guo, Jean-Franc{c}ois Ton, Yang Liu
0
0
Personalized decision making requires the knowledge of potential outcomes under different treatments, and confidence intervals about the potential outcomes further enrich this decision-making process and improve its reliability in high-stakes scenarios. Predicting potential outcomes along with its uncertainty in a counterfactual world poses the foundamental challenge in causal inference. Existing methods that construct confidence intervals for counterfactuals either rely on the assumption of strong ignorability, or need access to un-identifiable lower and upper bounds that characterize the difference between observational and interventional distributions. To overcome these limitations, we first propose a novel approach wTCP-DR based on transductive weighted conformal prediction, which provides confidence intervals for counterfactual outcomes with marginal converage guarantees, even under hidden confounding. With less restrictive assumptions, our approach requires access to a fraction of interventional data (from randomized controlled trials) to account for the covariate shift from observational distributoin to interventional distribution. Theoretical results explicitly demonstrate the conditions under which our algorithm is strictly advantageous to the naive method that only uses interventional data. After ensuring valid intervals on counterfactuals, it is straightforward to construct intervals for individual treatment effects (ITEs). We demonstrate our method across synthetic and real-world data, including recommendation systems, to verify the superiority of our methods compared against state-of-the-art baselines in terms of both coverage and efficiency
5/22/2024
Generating Counterfactual Trajectories with Latent Diffusion Models for Concept Discovery
Payal Varshney, Adriano Lucieri, Christoph Balada, Andreas Dengel, Sheraz Ahmed
0
0
Trustworthiness is a major prerequisite for the safe application of opaque deep learning models in high-stakes domains like medicine. Understanding the decision-making process not only contributes to fostering trust but might also reveal previously unknown decision criteria of complex models that could advance the state of medical research. The discovery of decision-relevant concepts from black box models is a particularly challenging task. This study proposes Concept Discovery through Latent Diffusion-based Counterfactual Trajectories (CDCT), a novel three-step framework for concept discovery leveraging the superior image synthesis capabilities of diffusion models. In the first step, CDCT uses a Latent Diffusion Model (LDM) to generate a counterfactual trajectory dataset. This dataset is used to derive a disentangled representation of classification-relevant concepts using a Variational Autoencoder (VAE). Finally, a search algorithm is applied to identify relevant concepts in the disentangled latent space. The application of CDCT to a classifier trained on the largest public skin lesion dataset revealed not only the presence of several biases but also meaningful biomarkers. Moreover, the counterfactuals generated within CDCT show better FID scores than those produced by a previously established state-of-the-art method, while being 12 times more resource-efficient. Unsupervised concept discovery holds great potential for the application of trustworthy AI and the further development of human knowledge in various domains. CDCT represents a further step in this direction.
4/17/2024