Confronting Reward Overoptimization for Diffusion Models: A Perspective of Inductive and Primacy Biases

Overview

• Bridging the gap between diffusion models and human preferences is crucial for their practical use.
• Optimizing reward models is a promising alignment strategy, but there are concerns about reward overoptimization compromising performance.
• This paper addresses the reward overoptimization problem in diffusion model alignment through the lenses of inductive and primacy biases.

Plain English Explanation

Diffusion models are a powerful type of generative model that can create new images, text, and other data. However, integrating these models into real-world applications can be challenging, as they may not always align with what humans prefer.

One approach to address this is optimizing reward models, where a model is trained to predict how much humans will like the output. This can help diffusion models generate content that is more aligned with human preferences. However, there are concerns that this approach could lead to "reward overoptimization," where the model becomes too focused on maximizing the reward at the expense of other important factors.

In this paper, the researchers explore two potential sources of reward overoptimization: inductive bias and primacy bias. Inductive bias refers to the model's inherent tendency to learn certain patterns, while primacy bias means the model may prioritize early training data or signals over later ones.

The researchers find that the temporal nature of the diffusion process can lead to a mismatch between current methods and the model's inductive bias, contributing to reward overoptimization. They also discover that "dormant neurons" in the reward model can act as a regularizer against this issue, while "active neurons" reflect primacy bias.

Inspired by these insights, the researchers propose a new algorithm called Temporal Diffusion Policy Optimization with critic active neuron Reset (TDPO-R). This approach aims to exploit the temporal inductive bias of diffusion models and mitigate the primacy bias from active neurons. Their experiments show that TDPO-R is effective in reducing reward overoptimization.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by acknowledging the importance of bridging the gap between diffusion models and human preferences for their integration into practical generative workflows. While optimizing downstream reward models has emerged as a promising alignment strategy, the authors raise concerns about the risk of excessive optimization with learned reward models, which could potentially compromise ground-truth performance.

To address this reward overoptimization problem, the researchers examine the issue through the lenses of both inductive and primacy biases. First, they identify a mismatch between current methods and the temporal inductive bias inherent in the multi-step denoising process of diffusion models as a potential source of reward overoptimization.

Surprisingly, the authors then discover that dormant neurons in the critic model act as a regularization against reward overoptimization, while active neurons reflect primacy bias. Motivated by these observations, they propose the TDPO-R algorithm, which exploits the temporal inductive bias of diffusion models and mitigates the primacy bias stemming from active neurons.

The empirical results presented in the paper demonstrate the superior efficacy of the TDPO-R method in mitigating reward overoptimization compared to other approaches.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful and well-designed approach to addressing the important challenge of aligning diffusion models with human preferences. The researchers' insights into the roles of inductive and primacy biases in the reward overoptimization problem are particularly interesting and could have broader implications for the field of AI alignment.

However, one potential limitation of the work is that it focuses primarily on the reward model optimization process, without delving deeply into the implications for the broader diffusion model training and deployment. It would be valuable to understand how the proposed TDPO-R algorithm might interact with or complement other techniques for aligning diffusion models, such as pixel-wise reinforcement learning or distributional preference reward modeling.

Additionally, while the paper presents promising empirical results, it would be helpful to see further evaluation of the method's scalability, robustness, and generalizability to a wider range of diffusion model architectures and application domains.

Conclusion

This paper tackles the crucial challenge of bridging the gap between diffusion models and human preferences, which is essential for the practical integration of these powerful generative models. By addressing the reward overoptimization problem through the lens of inductive and primacy biases, the researchers have developed a novel algorithm, TDPO-R, that demonstrates promising results in mitigating this issue.

The insights gained from this work could have broader implications for the field of AI alignment, potentially informing the development of more robust and human-centered generative models. As the use of diffusion models continues to grow, research like this will be increasingly important in ensuring these models are aligned with human values and preferences.