Constrained Adaptive Attack: Effective Adversarial Attack Against Deep Neural Networks for Tabular Data
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper "Constrained Adaptive Attack: Effective Adversarial Attack Against Deep Neural Networks for Tabular Data" proposes a new adversarial attack method for deep neural networks working on tabular data.
- The authors develop a constrained adaptive attack that can effectively generate adversarial examples while satisfying application-specific constraints.
- The proposed method outperforms existing adversarial attack techniques in terms of attack success rate and perturbation size.
Plain English Explanation
Deep neural networks have become widely used in a variety of applications, including those that work with tabular data, such as predicting loan defaults or diagnosing medical conditions. However, these models can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small, carefully crafted changes to the input data can cause the model to make incorrect predictions.
The authors of this paper have developed a new type of adversarial attack, called the "Constrained Adaptive Attack," that is particularly effective against deep neural networks working on tabular data. The key idea is to generate adversarial examples that not only fool the model, but also satisfy certain application-specific constraints, such as ensuring that the modified data points remain within a valid range or have a plausible distribution.
By incorporating these constraints into the attack process, the authors are able to create adversarial examples that are more realistic and harder for the model to detect. Their experiments show that the Constrained Adaptive Attack outperforms existing adversarial attack methods in terms of both the success rate of the attack and the amount of perturbation required to achieve that success.
This research is important because it highlights the need for deep learning models to be more robust to adversarial attacks, especially in sensitive applications where the integrity of the data is crucial. The Constrained Adaptive Attack provides a new tool for evaluating the security of these models and can help drive the development of more secure and reliable deep learning systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new adversarial attack method called the "Constrained Adaptive Attack" (CAA) that is designed to be effective against deep neural networks working on tabular data. The key features of the CAA are:
-
Constrained Optimization: The attack formulation includes application-specific constraints, such as ensuring that the modified data points remain within a valid range or have a plausible distribution. This helps generate more realistic adversarial examples.
-
Adaptive Mechanism: The attack adapts to the target model's properties, such as the gradients and the loss function, in order to generate more effective adversarial examples.
-
Gradient-based Optimization: The authors use a gradient-based optimization algorithm to efficiently search for the optimal adversarial perturbations that satisfy the constraints and fool the target model.
The authors evaluate the CAA on several tabular datasets and deep neural network models, and compare its performance to other state-of-the-art adversarial attack methods. The results show that the CAA achieves a higher attack success rate while using smaller perturbations, indicating that it is a more effective and practical adversarial attack.
The paper also discusses potential defense mechanisms, such as adversarial training, that can be used to improve the robustness of deep learning models against the CAA and other adversarial attacks.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the proposed Constrained Adaptive Attack (CAA) method. The authors have considered application-specific constraints and adaptive mechanisms, which are important aspects for generating realistic and effective adversarial examples.
One potential limitation of the CAA is that it may require additional information about the target model, such as the gradients and loss function, which may not be available in all real-world scenarios. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore black-box attack strategies that do not rely on such information.
Additionally, the paper focuses on tabular data, which has its own unique characteristics and challenges compared to other data modalities, such as images or text. It would be interesting to see if the CAA can be extended to work effectively on other types of data as well.
Finally, while the authors discuss potential defense mechanisms, such as adversarial training, the paper does not provide a thorough evaluation of the robustness of these defenses against the CAA. Further research in this direction would be valuable to understand the broader implications of this attack method.
Overall, the "Constrained Adaptive Attack" is a significant contribution to the field of adversarial machine learning, and the insights from this paper can help drive the development of more secure and robust deep learning systems, especially for tabular data applications.
Conclusion
The "Constrained Adaptive Attack" (CAA) proposed in this paper is a novel and effective adversarial attack method for deep neural networks working on tabular data. By incorporating application-specific constraints and adaptive mechanisms, the CAA is able to generate adversarial examples that are both effective at fooling the target model and more realistic in terms of the modified data points.
The authors' extensive evaluation demonstrates the superiority of the CAA over existing adversarial attack techniques, which is an important step forward in understanding the vulnerabilities of deep learning models and developing more robust defenses.
This research has broad implications for the deployment of deep learning in sensitive applications, such as finance, healthcare, and security, where the integrity of the data is crucial. The insights from this paper can help drive the development of more secure and reliable deep learning systems that are better equipped to withstand adversarial attacks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Constrained Adaptive Attack: Effective Adversarial Attack Against Deep Neural Networks for Tabular Data
Thibault Simonetto, Salah Ghamizi, Maxime Cordy
State-of-the-art deep learning models for tabular data have recently achieved acceptable performance to be deployed in industrial settings. However, the robustness of these models remains scarcely explored. Contrary to computer vision, there are no effective attacks to properly evaluate the adversarial robustness of deep tabular models due to intrinsic properties of tabular data, such as categorical features, immutability, and feature relationship constraints. To fill this gap, we first propose CAPGD, a gradient attack that overcomes the failures of existing gradient attacks with adaptive mechanisms. This new attack does not require parameter tuning and further degrades the accuracy, up to 81% points compared to the previous gradient attacks. Second, we design CAA, an efficient evasion attack that combines our CAPGD attack and MOEVA, the best search-based attack. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our attacks on five architectures and four critical use cases. Our empirical study demonstrates that CAA outperforms all existing attacks in 17 over the 20 settings, and leads to a drop in the accuracy by up to 96.1% points and 21.9% points compared to CAPGD and MOEVA respectively while being up to five times faster than MOEVA. Given the effectiveness and efficiency of our new attacks, we argue that they should become the minimal test for any new defense or robust architectures in tabular machine learning.
Read more6/4/2024
0
TabularBench: Benchmarking Adversarial Robustness for Tabular Deep Learning in Real-world Use-cases
Thibault Simonetto, Salah Ghamizi, Maxime Cordy
While adversarial robustness in computer vision is a mature research field, fewer researchers have tackled the evasion attacks against tabular deep learning, and even fewer investigated robustification mechanisms and reliable defenses. We hypothesize that this lag in the research on tabular adversarial attacks is in part due to the lack of standardized benchmarks. To fill this gap, we propose TabularBench, the first comprehensive benchmark of robustness of tabular deep learning classification models. We evaluated adversarial robustness with CAA, an ensemble of gradient and search attacks which was recently demonstrated as the most effective attack against a tabular model. In addition to our open benchmark (https://github.com/serval-uni-lu/tabularbench) where we welcome submissions of new models and defenses, we implement 7 robustification mechanisms inspired by state-of-the-art defenses in computer vision and propose the largest benchmark of robust tabular deep learning over 200 models across five critical scenarios in finance, healthcare and security. We curated real datasets for each use case, augmented with hundreds of thousands of realistic synthetic inputs, and trained and assessed our models with and without data augmentations. We open-source our library that provides API access to all our pre-trained robust tabular models, and the largest datasets of real and synthetic tabular inputs. Finally, we analyze the impact of various defenses on the robustness and provide actionable insights to design new defenses and robustification mechanisms.
Read more8/15/2024
0
EaTVul: ChatGPT-based Evasion Attack Against Software Vulnerability Detection
Shigang Liu, Di Cao, Junae Kim, Tamas Abraham, Paul Montague, Seyit Camtepe, Jun Zhang, Yang Xiang
Recently, deep learning has demonstrated promising results in enhancing the accuracy of vulnerability detection and identifying vulnerabilities in software. However, these techniques are still vulnerable to attacks. Adversarial examples can exploit vulnerabilities within deep neural networks, posing a significant threat to system security. This study showcases the susceptibility of deep learning models to adversarial attacks, which can achieve 100% attack success rate (refer to Table 5). The proposed method, EaTVul, encompasses six stages: identification of important samples using support vector machines, identification of important features using the attention mechanism, generation of adversarial data based on these features using ChatGPT, preparation of an adversarial attack pool, selection of seed data using a fuzzy genetic algorithm, and the execution of an evasion attack. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of EaTVul, achieving an attack success rate of more than 83% when the snippet size is greater than 2. Furthermore, in most cases with a snippet size of 4, EaTVul achieves a 100% attack success rate. The findings of this research emphasize the necessity of robust defenses against adversarial attacks in software vulnerability detection.
Read more7/30/2024
🛠️
0
AttackBench: Evaluating Gradient-based Attacks for Adversarial Examples
Antonio Emanuele Cin`a, J'er^ome Rony, Maura Pintor, Luca Demetrio, Ambra Demontis, Battista Biggio, Ismail Ben Ayed, Fabio Roli
Adversarial examples are typically optimized with gradient-based attacks. While novel attacks are continuously proposed, each is shown to outperform its predecessors using different experimental setups, hyperparameter settings, and number of forward and backward calls to the target models. This provides overly-optimistic and even biased evaluations that may unfairly favor one particular attack over the others. In this work, we aim to overcome these limitations by proposing AttackBench, i.e., the first evaluation framework that enables a fair comparison among different attacks. To this end, we first propose a categorization of gradient-based attacks, identifying their main components and differences. We then introduce our framework, which evaluates their effectiveness and efficiency. We measure these characteristics by (i) defining an optimality metric that quantifies how close an attack is to the optimal solution, and (ii) limiting the number of forward and backward queries to the model, such that all attacks are compared within a given maximum query budget. Our extensive experimental analysis compares more than 100 attack implementations with a total of over 800 different configurations against CIFAR-10 and ImageNet models, highlighting that only very few attacks outperform all the competing approaches. Within this analysis, we shed light on several implementation issues that prevent many attacks from finding better solutions or running at all. We release AttackBench as a publicly available benchmark, aiming to continuously update it to include and evaluate novel gradient-based attacks for optimizing adversarial examples.
Read more5/1/2024