Construction numbers: How to build a graph?

Read original: arXiv:2302.13186 - Published 6/21/2024 by Paul C. Kainen
Total Score

0

👨‍🏫

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses the problem of counting the number of linear extensions of a partial order, which was considered by Stanley around 50 years ago.
  • For the partial order on the vertices and edges of a graph given by inclusion, the paper refers to a linear extension as a "construction sequence" for the graph, as each edge follows the vertices where it is attached.
  • The paper counts the number of these construction sequences for various graph families.
  • It also considers the set of all length-$n$ construction sequences produced by the graphs with $n$ elements, simplified to their structural skeleton (vertex or edge), and further allows the generating graph to be structurally constrained.
  • The efficiency of these approaches is analyzed.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a mathematical problem called counting the number of linear extensions of a partial order. This is related to concepts like counting the number of ways to arrange a set of objects in a specific order, while respecting some constraints.

In the context of graphs, the paper looks at the partial order defined by the inclusion of vertices and edges. Specifically, a linear extension of this partial order is called a "construction sequence" for the graph, as it represents a way to build the graph by adding edges one by one, following the existing vertices.

The researchers investigate how to efficiently count the number of these construction sequences for different types of graphs. They also consider a more general problem, where they look at the set of all construction sequences of a certain length, produced by graphs with a fixed number of elements, and explore ways to characterize and count these sequences.

This work is relevant to fields like graph neural networks, where understanding the count and structure of subgraphs can be important for analyzing the expressive power of the models.

Technical Explanation

The paper focuses on the problem of counting the number of linear extensions of a partial order, which was considered by Stanley around 50 years ago. In the context of graphs, the researchers look at the partial order defined by the inclusion of vertices and edges. They refer to a linear extension of this partial order as a "construction sequence" for the graph, as each edge follows the vertices where it is attached.

The paper counts the number of these construction sequences for various graph families, such as trees, cycles, and complete graphs. It also considers the set of all length-$n$ construction sequences produced by the graphs with $n$ elements, simplified to their structural skeleton (vertex or edge), and further allows the generating graph to be structurally constrained.

The researchers analyze the efficiency of these approaches, which is relevant to understanding the capabilities and limitations of graph neural networks in capturing subgraph structures.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough analysis of the problem of counting the number of linear extensions of a partial order, with a specific focus on the case of graph structures. The researchers explore various approaches and graph families, demonstrating their efficiency through analytical and experimental results.

One potential limitation of the work is that it mainly focuses on the theoretical aspects of the problem, without providing much insight into the practical implications or applications of the findings. While the connections to graph neural networks and subgraph counting are mentioned, the paper does not delve deeply into the real-world relevance of this research.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential challenges or limitations that may arise when dealing with larger or more complex graph structures, or when considering other types of partial orders beyond the inclusion of vertices and edges.

It would be valuable for future research to explore the practical applications of this work, particularly in the context of graph-based machine learning and data analysis tasks, and to investigate ways to extend the methods to handle a broader range of scenarios.

Conclusion

This paper presents a detailed study of the problem of counting the number of linear extensions of a partial order, with a specific focus on the case of graph structures. The researchers explore various approaches to efficiently count the number of "construction sequences" for different graph families, as well as the set of all construction sequences of a certain length produced by graphs with a fixed number of elements.

While the theoretical aspects of this work are well-developed, the paper could benefit from a stronger emphasis on the practical implications and potential applications of the findings, particularly in the context of graph-based machine learning and data analysis. Nonetheless, the insights and techniques presented in the paper contribute to our understanding of the structure and properties of graphs, which can have broader implications for fields like graph neural networks and causal inference.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👨‍🏫

Total Score

0

Construction numbers: How to build a graph?

Paul C. Kainen

Counting the number of linear extensions of a partial order was considered by Stanley about 50 years ago. For the partial order on the vertices and edges of a graph given by inclusion, we call a linear extension a {it construction sequence} for the graph as each edge follows the vertices where it is attached. The number of these c-sequences is counted for various graph families. We also consider the set of all length-$n$ c-sequences produced by the graphs with $n$ elements, simplified to their structural skeleton: vertex or edge, and further allow the generating graph to be structurally constrained. Efficiency is analyzed.

Read more

6/21/2024

📶

Total Score

0

An Efficient Subgraph GNN with Provable Substructure Counting Power

Zuoyu Yan, Junru Zhou, Liangcai Gao, Zhi Tang, Muhan Zhang

We investigate the enhancement of graph neural networks' (GNNs) representation power through their ability in substructure counting. Recent advances have seen the adoption of subgraph GNNs, which partition an input graph into numerous subgraphs, subsequently applying GNNs to each to augment the graph's overall representation. Despite their ability to identify various substructures, subgraph GNNs are hindered by significant computational and memory costs. In this paper, we tackle a critical question: Is it possible for GNNs to count substructures both textbf{efficiently} and textbf{provably}? Our approach begins with a theoretical demonstration that the distance to rooted nodes in subgraphs is key to boosting the counting power of subgraph GNNs. To avoid the need for repetitively applying GNN across all subgraphs, we introduce precomputed structural embeddings that encapsulate this crucial distance information. Experiments validate that our proposed model retains the counting power of subgraph GNNs while achieving significantly faster performance.

Read more

6/14/2024

Bridging Weighted First Order Model Counting and Graph Polynomials
Total Score

0

Bridging Weighted First Order Model Counting and Graph Polynomials

Qipeng Kuang, Ondv{r}ej Kuv{z}elka, Yuanhong Wang, Yuyi Wang

The Weighted First-Order Model Counting Problem (WFOMC) asks to compute the weighted sum of models of a given first-order logic sentence over a given domain. It can be solved in time polynomial in the domain size for sentences from the two-variable fragment with counting quantifiers, known as $C^2$. This polynomial-time complexity is also retained when extending $C^2$ by one of the following axioms: linear order axiom, tree axiom, forest axiom, directed acyclic graph axiom or connectedness axiom. An interesting question remains as to which other axioms can be added to the first-order sentences in this way. We provide a new perspective on this problem by associating WFOMC with graph polynomials. Using WFOMC, we define Weak Connectedness Polynomial and Strong Connectedness Polynomials for first-order logic sentences. It turns out that these polynomials have the following interesting properties. First, they can be computed in polynomial time in the domain size for sentences from $C^2$. Second, we can use them to solve WFOMC with all of the existing axioms known to be tractable as well as with new ones such as bipartiteness, strong connectedness, being a spanning subgraph, having $k$ connected components, etc. Third, the well-known Tutte polynomial can be recovered as a special case of the Weak Connectedness Polynomial, and the Strict and Non-Strict Directed Chromatic Polynomials can be recovered from the Strong Connectedness Polynomials, which allows us to show that these important graph polynomials can be computed in time polynomial in the number of vertices for any graph that can be encoded by a fixed $C^2$ sentence and a conjunction of an arbitrary number of ground unary literals.

Read more

7/17/2024

Fast Iterative Graph Computing with Updated Neighbor States
Total Score

0

Fast Iterative Graph Computing with Updated Neighbor States

Yijie Zhou, Shufeng Gong, Feng Yao, Hanzhang Chen, Song Yu, Pengxi Liu, Yanfeng Zhang, Ge Yu, Jeffrey Xu Yu

Enhancing the efficiency of iterative computation on graphs has garnered considerable attention in both industry and academia. Nonetheless, the majority of efforts focus on expediting iterative computation by minimizing the running time per iteration step, ignoring the optimization of the number of iteration rounds, which is a crucial aspect of iterative computation. We experimentally verified the correlation between the vertex processing order and the number of iterative rounds, thus making it possible to reduce the number of execution rounds for iterative computation. In this paper, we propose a graph reordering method, GoGraph, which can construct a well-formed vertex processing order effectively reducing the number of iteration rounds and, consequently, accelerating iterative computation. Before delving into GoGraph, a metric function is introduced to quantify the efficiency of vertex processing order in accelerating iterative computation. This metric reflects the quality of the processing order by counting the number of edges whose source precedes the destination. GoGraph employs a divide-and-conquer mindset to establish the vertex processing order by maximizing the value of the metric function. Our experimental results show that GoGraph outperforms current state-of-the-art reordering algorithms by 1.83x on average (up to 3.34x) in runtime.

Read more

7/23/2024