Bridging Weighted First Order Model Counting and Graph Polynomials
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a novel approach to bridging the gap between weighted first-order model counting and graph polynomials.
- It demonstrates how to leverage the connection between these two fields to develop new techniques for lifted inference and weighted model counting.
- The researchers propose a construction for mapping between first-order logical formulas and graph polynomials, enabling the application of graph-based methods to logical reasoning tasks.
- The paper also explores how this connection can be used to design more efficient algorithms for symmetry-aware lifted inference.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the relationship between two important concepts in computer science and artificial intelligence: weighted first-order model counting and graph polynomials. Weighted first-order model counting is a technique for counting the number of ways a logical formula can be satisfied, taking into account the weights or probabilities of different interpretations. Graph polynomials are mathematical functions that describe the properties of graphs, such as the number of ways to color the nodes or the likelihood of certain subgraph patterns.
The researchers show that there is a deep connection between these two concepts, and they develop a way to translate back and forth between logical formulas and graph polynomials. This allows them to use powerful graph-based algorithms to solve problems in logical reasoning, such as lifted inference. For example, they can use graph-based methods to more efficiently count the number of ways a first-order logical formula can be satisfied, taking into account symmetries and shared structure in the formula.
Overall, this work provides a new bridge between logical and graph-based approaches to reasoning and inference, opening up new possibilities for more efficient and powerful AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel approach to connecting weighted first-order model counting and graph polynomials. Weighted first-order model counting is a technique for counting the number of ways a logical formula can be satisfied, taking into account the weights or probabilities of different interpretations. Graph polynomials are mathematical functions that describe the properties of graphs, such as the number of ways to color the nodes or the likelihood of certain subgraph patterns.
The researchers introduce a construction that maps first-order logical formulas to graph polynomials, enabling the application of graph-based methods to logical reasoning tasks. This connection is then leveraged to develop new techniques for lifted inference, which exploits symmetries in the logical formula to perform more efficient reasoning.
Key elements of the paper include:
- A formal definition of the mapping between first-order logical formulas and graph polynomials
- Algorithms for translating between these two representations
- Theoretical analysis of the properties of this mapping and its connection to weighted first-order model counting
- Experiments demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed approach for lifted inference and weighted model counting
The researchers show that this bridging of weighted first-order model counting and graph polynomials can lead to more efficient and scalable algorithms for a variety of logical reasoning tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to connecting logical and graph-based methods for reasoning and inference. By establishing a formal mapping between first-order logical formulas and graph polynomials, the researchers open up new avenues for applying powerful graph-based algorithms to logical reasoning problems.
One potential limitation of the approach is the complexity of the mapping construction, which may limit its scalability to larger and more complex logical formulas. Additionally, the paper does not explore the limitations of the mapping or potential issues that may arise when applying it to certain types of logical formulas or graph structures.
Further research could investigate ways to optimize the mapping and translation algorithms, as well as explore multi-order graph clustering or other techniques to handle more complex logical and graph-based structures. Empirical evaluations on a wider range of tasks and benchmarks would also help to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed approach.
Overall, this work represents an important step towards bridging the gap between logical and graph-based methods, with the potential to lead to more efficient and powerful AI systems in the future.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach to connecting weighted first-order model counting and graph polynomials, two important concepts in computer science and AI. By establishing a formal mapping between these two domains, the researchers enable the application of powerful graph-based algorithms to logical reasoning tasks, such as lifted inference and weighted model counting.
The proposed techniques have the potential to lead to more efficient and scalable algorithms for a variety of logical reasoning problems, with applications in areas such as symmetry-aware lifted inference and multi-order graph clustering. While the paper highlights some limitations and areas for further research, it represents an important step towards bridging the gap between logical and graph-based methods in AI and computer science.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Bridging Weighted First Order Model Counting and Graph Polynomials
Qipeng Kuang, Ondv{r}ej Kuv{z}elka, Yuanhong Wang, Yuyi Wang
The Weighted First-Order Model Counting Problem (WFOMC) asks to compute the weighted sum of models of a given first-order logic sentence over a given domain. It can be solved in time polynomial in the domain size for sentences from the two-variable fragment with counting quantifiers, known as $C^2$. This polynomial-time complexity is also retained when extending $C^2$ by one of the following axioms: linear order axiom, tree axiom, forest axiom, directed acyclic graph axiom or connectedness axiom. An interesting question remains as to which other axioms can be added to the first-order sentences in this way. We provide a new perspective on this problem by associating WFOMC with graph polynomials. Using WFOMC, we define Weak Connectedness Polynomial and Strong Connectedness Polynomials for first-order logic sentences. It turns out that these polynomials have the following interesting properties. First, they can be computed in polynomial time in the domain size for sentences from $C^2$. Second, we can use them to solve WFOMC with all of the existing axioms known to be tractable as well as with new ones such as bipartiteness, strong connectedness, being a spanning subgraph, having $k$ connected components, etc. Third, the well-known Tutte polynomial can be recovered as a special case of the Weak Connectedness Polynomial, and the Strict and Non-Strict Directed Chromatic Polynomials can be recovered from the Strong Connectedness Polynomials, which allows us to show that these important graph polynomials can be computed in time polynomial in the number of vertices for any graph that can be encoded by a fixed $C^2$ sentence and a conjunction of an arbitrary number of ground unary literals.
Read more7/17/2024
🤯
0
Lifted Inference beyond First-Order Logic
Sagar Malhotra, Davide Bizzaro, Luciano Serafini
Weighted First Order Model Counting (WFOMC) is fundamental to probabilistic inference in statistical relational learning models. As WFOMC is known to be intractable in general ($#$P-complete), logical fragments that admit polynomial time WFOMC are of significant interest. Such fragments are called domain liftable. Recent works have shown that the two-variable fragment of first order logic extended with counting quantifiers ($mathrm{C^2}$) is domain-liftable. However, many properties of real-world data, like acyclicity in citation networks and connectivity in social networks, cannot be modeled in $mathrm{C^2}$, or first order logic in general. In this work, we expand the domain liftability of $mathrm{C^2}$ with multiple such properties. We show that any $mathrm{C^2}$ sentence remains domain liftable when one of its relations is restricted to represent a directed acyclic graph, a connected graph, a tree (resp. a directed tree) or a forest (resp. a directed forest). All our results rely on a novel and general methodology of counting by splitting. Besides their application to probabilistic inference, our results provide a general framework for counting combinatorial structures. We expand a vast array of previous results in discrete mathematics literature on directed acyclic graphs, phylogenetic networks, etc.
Read more4/30/2024
📈
0
Lifted Algorithms for Symmetric Weighted First-Order Model Sampling
Yuanhong Wang, Juhua Pu, Yuyi Wang, Ondv{r}ej Kuv{z}elka
Weighted model counting (WMC) is the task of computing the weighted sum of all satisfying assignments (i.e., models) of a propositional formula. Similarly, weighted model sampling (WMS) aims to randomly generate models with probability proportional to their respective weights. Both WMC and WMS are hard to solve exactly, falling under the $#mathsf{P}$-hard complexity class. However, it is known that the counting problem may sometimes be tractable, if the propositional formula can be compactly represented and expressed in first-order logic. In such cases, model counting problems can be solved in time polynomial in the domain size, and are known as domain-liftable. The following question then arises: Is it also the case for weighted model sampling? This paper addresses this question and answers it affirmatively. Specifically, we prove the domain-liftability under sampling for the two-variables fragment of first-order logic with counting quantifiers in this paper, by devising an efficient sampling algorithm for this fragment that runs in time polynomial in the domain size. We then further show that this result continues to hold even in the presence of cardinality constraints. To empirically verify our approach, we conduct experiments over various first-order formulas designed for the uniform generation of combinatorial structures and sampling in statistical-relational models. The results demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms a start-of-the-art WMS sampler by a substantial margin, confirming the theoretical results.
Read more6/17/2024
📈
0
Quantum Algorithms for Weighted Constrained Sampling and Weighted Model Counting
Fabrizio Riguzzi
We consider the problems of weighted constrained sampling and weighted model counting, where we are given a propositional formula and a weight for each world. The first problem consists of sampling worlds with a probability proportional to their weight given that the formula is satisfied. The latter is the problem of computing the sum of the weights of the models of the formula. Both have applications in many fields such as probabilistic reasoning, graphical models, statistical physics, statistics and hardware verification. In this article, we propose QWCS and QWMC, quantum algorithms for performing weighted constrained sampling and weighted model counting, respectively. Both are based on the quantum search/quantum model counting algorithms that are modified to take into account the weights. In the black box model of computation, where we can only query an oracle for evaluating the Boolean function given an assignment, QWCS requires $O(2^{frac{n}{2}}+1/sqrt{text{WMC}})$ oracle calls, where where $n$ is the number of Boolean variables and $text{WMC}$ is the normalized between 0 and 1 weighted model count of the formula, while a classical algorithm has a complexity of $Omega(1/text{WMC})$. QWMC takes $Theta(2^{frac{n}{2}})$ oracle calss, while classically the best complexity is $Theta(2^n)$, thus achieving a quadratic speedup.
Read more7/19/2024