Context-Based Interface Prototyping: Understanding the Effect of Prototype Representation on User Feedback

Overview

• This paper investigates the impact of different prototype representations on user feedback during the development of human-machine interfaces, such as those used in automated vehicles.
• The researchers conducted user studies to compare how people respond to low-fidelity (e.g., sketches) versus high-fidelity (e.g., 3D models) prototypes in a virtual reality (VR) environment.
• The findings provide insights into how the level of realism in prototype representation affects the type and quality of user feedback, which can inform more effective interface design processes.

Plain English Explanation

When designing new technologies like user interfaces for automated vehicles, companies often create prototypes to get feedback from potential users. These prototypes can range from simple sketches to highly detailed 3D models.

This research explores how the level of realism in these prototypes impacts the kind of feedback users provide. The researchers had people test different prototype representations in a virtual reality (VR) environment and compared the results.

They found that low-fidelity prototypes (like sketches) tend to elicit more feedback about the overall concept and high-level design. On the other hand, high-fidelity prototypes (like 3D models) prompt users to focus more on specific details and implementation.

This is similar to findings from related research on tangible user interfaces and the role of pseudo-haptics in user experience.

The implication is that companies should carefully consider the level of prototype realism based on what kind of feedback they want to gather during the design process. Low-fidelity prototypes may be better for exploring concept feasibility, while high-fidelity ones are more useful for refining the details.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted two user studies to investigate the impact of prototype representation on the type and quality of user feedback during the development of human-machine interfaces.

In the first study, participants experienced low-fidelity (2D sketches) and high-fidelity (3D models) prototypes of an in-vehicle interface in a virtual reality (VR) environment. They found that low-fidelity prototypes elicited more feedback about the overall concept and high-level design, while high-fidelity prototypes prompted more feedback about specific details and implementation.

The second study examined how the presence of a self-embodied avatar (a virtual representation of the user) in the VR environment affected the feedback. They discovered that the addition of a self-embodied avatar led to more critical and nuanced feedback, potentially due to increased immersion and a stronger sense of personal investment in the interface.

These findings suggest that the level of prototype realism can significantly influence the type and quality of user feedback, which is an important consideration in the design of human-machine interfaces. The results align with prior research on the impact of avatar representation on user perception and the use of tangible interfaces to support collaborative design.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their study, including the relatively small sample size and the specific context of in-vehicle interfaces. They suggest that further research is needed to explore the generalizability of their findings to other domains and interface types.

Additionally, while the study provides valuable insights into the impact of prototype representation, it does not delve into the underlying cognitive and psychological mechanisms that drive the observed differences in user feedback. Expanding the research to consider these factors, as in the survey on pseudo-haptics, could yield even deeper understanding.

It would also be interesting to investigate how other factors, such as user expertise, task complexity, and the specific design goals, might interact with the effects of prototype representation on user feedback.

Conclusion

This research offers important insights for designers and researchers working on the development of human-machine interfaces. By understanding how the level of prototype realism influences the type and quality of user feedback, design teams can make more informed decisions about the appropriate prototyping methods to use at different stages of the design process.

The findings suggest that low-fidelity prototypes may be better suited for exploring conceptual feasibility and high-level design, while high-fidelity prototypes are more useful for refining specific details and implementation. Incorporating self-embodied avatars in the VR environment can also lead to more critical and nuanced user feedback.

These insights can help streamline the design process and lead to more effective and user-centered interfaces, ultimately improving the overall experience for end-users.