Designing Interactions With Shared AVs in Complex Urban Mobility Scenarios

Read original: arXiv:2406.12181 - Published 6/19/2024 by Marius Hoggenmueller, Martin Tomitsch, Stewart Worrall
Total Score

0

Designing Interactions With Shared AVs in Complex Urban Mobility Scenarios

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the design of interactions between shared autonomous vehicles (AVs) and humans in complex urban mobility scenarios.
  • The researchers investigated how to create effective communication and coordination between shared AVs and pedestrians, cyclists, and other road users.
  • The goal was to improve safety, efficiency, and user experience in urban environments as autonomous vehicles become more prevalent.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at how people can interact with self-driving cars in busy city settings. As more autonomous vehicles (AVs) start appearing on city streets, it's important to figure out the best ways for these cars to communicate and coordinate with pedestrians, cyclists, and other drivers. The researchers wanted to design interactions that would make getting around cities safer, more efficient, and easier for everyone to use.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a study on designing interactions between shared autonomous vehicles (AVs) and humans in complex urban mobility scenarios. The researchers conducted observations and interviews to understand the challenges and pain points involved in coordination between AVs and other road users like pedestrians, cyclists, and human-driven vehicles.

Based on these insights, they developed a conceptual framework and set of design principles to guide the development of communication and interaction mechanisms for shared AVs. This included considerations around situational awareness, legibility of AV intent, smooth flow of traffic, and building trust between AVs and humans.

The researchers then implemented several prototype interfaces and evaluated them through user studies. The prototypes explored different modalities like visual, audio, and haptic feedback to convey information about the AV's behavior and intentions. The findings highlighted the importance of clear, intuitive, and context-aware communication to enable smooth and safe interactions.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thoughtful and comprehensive exploration of the challenges involved in designing interactions between shared AVs and humans in complex urban environments. The researchers have done a commendable job of grounding their work in real-world observations and user needs.

One potential limitation of the study is the relatively small scale of the user evaluations. While the prototypes were tested with various stakeholders, expanding the scope to larger and more diverse populations could yield additional insights.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the technical implementation details or the specific algorithms and sensors required to realize the proposed interaction concepts. Further research may be needed to translate the design principles into robust and scalable AV systems.

Overall, this work represents an important step towards creating safer and more user-friendly autonomous mobility solutions that can seamlessly integrate with existing urban transportation infrastructure and practices. The design guidelines and insights presented in the paper can serve as a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners working in this rapidly evolving field.

Conclusion

This research paper offers a detailed examination of the design considerations for interactions between shared autonomous vehicles (AVs) and humans in complex urban mobility scenarios. By combining user research, conceptual frameworks, and prototype evaluations, the authors have identified key principles to guide the development of communication and coordination mechanisms that can improve the safety, efficiency, and user experience of autonomous transportation in cities.

The findings from this work can inform the ongoing efforts to integrate AVs into urban environments and foster a smooth and harmonious coexistence between these autonomous systems and traditional road users. As the adoption of shared AVs continues to grow, the insights and design guidelines presented in this paper will be crucial in realizing the full potential of this technology to transform urban mobility in a way that benefits all citizens.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Designing Interactions With Shared AVs in Complex Urban Mobility Scenarios
Total Score

0

Designing Interactions With Shared AVs in Complex Urban Mobility Scenarios

Marius Hoggenmueller, Martin Tomitsch, Stewart Worrall

In this article, we report on the design and evaluation of an external human-machine interface (eHMI) for a real autonomous vehicle (AV), developed to operate as a shared transport pod in a pedestrianized urban space. We present insights about our human-centered design process, which included testing initial concepts through a tangible toolkit and evaluating 360-degree recordings of a staged pick-up scenario in virtual reality. Our results indicate that in complex mobility scenarios, participants filter for critical eHMI messages; further, we found that implicit cues (i.e., pick-up manoeuvre and proximity to the rider) influence participants' experience and trust, while at the same time more explicit interaction modes are desired. This highlights the importance of considering interactions with shared AVs as a service more holistically, in order to develop knowledge about AV-pedestrian interactions in complex mobility scenarios that complements more targeted eHMI evaluations.

Read more

6/19/2024

A Tangible Multi-Display Toolkit to Support the Collaborative Design Exploration of AV-Pedestrian Interfaces
Total Score

0

A Tangible Multi-Display Toolkit to Support the Collaborative Design Exploration of AV-Pedestrian Interfaces

Marius Hoggenmuller, Martin Tomitsch, Callum Parker, Trung Thanh Nguyen, Dawei Zhou, Stewart Worrall, Eduardo Nebot

The advent of cyber-physical systems, such as robots and autonomous vehicles (AVs), brings new opportunities and challenges for the domain of interaction design. Though there is consensus about the value of human-centred development, there is a lack of documented tailored methods and tools for involving multiple stakeholders in design exploration processes. In this paper we present a novel approach using a tangible multi-display toolkit. Orchestrating computer-generated imagery across multiple displays, the toolkit enables multiple viewing angles and perspectives to be captured simultaneously (e.g. top-view, first-person pedestrian view). Participants are able to directly interact with the simulated environment through tangible objects. At the same time, the objects physically simulate the interface's behaviour (e.g. through an integrated LED display). We evaluated the toolkit in design sessions with experts to collect feedback and input on the design of an AV-pedestrian interface. The paper reports on how the combination of tangible objects and multiple displays supports collaborative design explorations.

Read more

6/14/2024

Context-Based Interface Prototyping: Understanding the Effect of Prototype Representation on User Feedback
Total Score

0

Context-Based Interface Prototyping: Understanding the Effect of Prototype Representation on User Feedback

Marius Hoggenmueller, Martin Tomitsch, Luke Hespanhol, Tram Thi Minh Tran, Stewart Worrall, Eduardo Nebot

The rise of autonomous systems in cities, such as automated vehicles (AVs), requires new approaches for prototyping and evaluating how people interact with those systems through context-based user interfaces, such as external human-machine interfaces (eHMIs). In this paper, we present a comparative study of three prototype representations (real-world VR, computer-generated VR, real-world video) of an eHMI in a mixed-methods study with 42 participants. Quantitative results show that while the real-world VR representation results in higher sense of presence, no significant differences in user experience and trust towards the AV itself were found. However, interview data shows that participants focused on different experiential and perceptual aspects in each of the prototype representations. These differences are linked to spatial awareness and perceived realism of the AV behaviour and its context, affecting in turn how participants assess trust and the eHMI. The paper offers guidelines for prototyping and evaluating context-based interfaces through simulations.

Read more

6/14/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Not all explicit cues help communicate: Pedestrians' perceptions, fixations, and decisions toward automated vehicles with varied appearance

Wei Lyu, Yaqin Cao, Yi Ding, Jingyu Li, Kai Tian, Hui Zhang

Given pedestrians' vulnerability in road traffic, it remains unclear how novel AV appearances will impact pedestrians crossing behaviour. To address this gap, this study pioneers an investigation into the influence of AVs' exterior design, correlated with their kinematics, on pedestrians' road-crossing perception and decision-making. A video-based eye-tracking experimental study was conducted with 61 participants who responded to video stimuli depicting a manipulated vehicle approaching a predefined road-crossing location on an unsignalized, two-way road. The vehicle's kinematic pattern was manipulated into yielding and non-yielding, and its external appearances were varied across five types: with a human driver (as a conventional vehicle), with no driver (as an AV), with text-based identity indications, with roof radar sensors, with dynamic eHMIs adjusted to vehicle kinematics. Participants' perceived clarity, crossing initiation distance (CID), crossing decision time (CDT), and gaze behaviour, during interactions were recorded and reported. The results indicated that AVs' kinematic profiles play a dominant role in pedestrians' road-crossing decisions, supported by their subjective evaluations, CID, CDT, and gaze patterns during interactions. Moreover, the use of clear eHMI, such as dynamic pedestrian icons, reduced pedestrians' visual load, enhanced their perceptual clarity, expedited road-crossing decisions, and thereby improved overall crossing efficiency. However, it was found that both textual identity indications and roof radar sensors have no significant effect on pedestrians' decisions but negatively impact pedestrians' visual attention, as evidenced by heightened fixation counts and prolonged fixation durations, particularly under yielding conditions. Excessive visual and cognitive resource occupation suggests that not all explicit cues facilitate human-vehicle communication.

Read more

7/10/2024