Contraction of Locally Differentially Private Mechanisms

Overview

• This paper investigates the contraction properties of locally differentially private mechanisms.
• The authors derive tight upper bounds on the divergence between the output distributions of an ε-LDP mechanism, in terms of the divergence between the corresponding input distributions.
• The results establish locally private versions of powerful tools for bounding minimax estimation risks, leading to better privacy analyses in various statistical problems.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a concept called "differential privacy," which is a way to protect the privacy of individual data points when analyzing a dataset. Specifically, it looks at a type of differential privacy called "local differential privacy," where the data is made private before it's even shared with the analyst.

The key idea is that the authors want to understand how much the output of a private analysis can differ from the original, unprotected data. They derive mathematical bounds that show how the amount of privacy protection (the "ε" parameter) limits this difference.

These bounds allow the authors to adapt some powerful statistical techniques, like the "van Trees inequality" and "Le Cam's method," to the private setting. This means they can still get strong guarantees about the accuracy of statistical inferences, even when the data is protected for privacy.

The significance of this work is that it provides a rigorous mathematical framework for reasoning about the privacy-utility tradeoffs in data analysis. This is important as organizations increasingly need to balance the benefits of data-driven insights with the need to protect individual privacy. The techniques developed in this paper can help enable this balance in a principled way.

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the contraction properties of locally differentially private mechanisms. Specifically, the authors derive tight upper bounds on the divergence between the output distributions of an ε-LDP mechanism K under input distributions P and Q, in terms of the divergence between P and Q.

The first main result presents a sharp upper bound on the χ²-divergence χ²(PK||QK) in terms of χ²(P||Q) and ε. The authors show this result holds for a wide family of divergences, including KL-divergence and squared Hellinger distance.

The second main result gives an upper bound on χ²(PK||QK) in terms of the total variation distance TV(P, Q) and ε.

The authors then leverage these bounds to establish locally private versions of powerful tools like the van Trees inequality, Le Cam's method, Assouad's method, and the mutual information method. These allow for better privacy analyses in applications such as entropy and discrete distribution estimation, non-parametric density estimation, and hypothesis testing.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous mathematical framework for understanding the privacy-utility tradeoffs in data analysis under local differential privacy. The derived bounds are shown to be tight, which is an important theoretical result.

However, the analysis is primarily theoretical, and the practical implications may depend on the specific application and dataset. The authors mention the need for further work to understand the tightness of the bounds in real-world scenarios.

Additionally, the techniques developed in this paper, while powerful, rely on strong assumptions, such as the availability of precise knowledge about the input distribution. In practice, this information may not be known, which could limit the applicability of the methods.

Further research is needed to explore the robustness of these techniques to violations of the underlying assumptions, as well as to investigate their scalability and computational efficiency for large-scale data problems.

Conclusion

This paper makes significant theoretical contributions to the field of locally differentially private data analysis. By deriving tight bounds on the contraction of output distributions, the authors enable the adaptation of powerful statistical tools to the private setting.

These results have important implications for balancing the competing goals of data utility and individual privacy, which is a crucial challenge in the era of big data. The techniques developed in this paper provide a rigorous foundation for reasoning about these tradeoffs and can help enable the responsible use of data for the benefit of society.

As the need for private and secure data analysis continues to grow, this work represents an important step forward in the ongoing effort to unlock the value of data while respecting fundamental rights to privacy.