Differentially private projection-depth-based medians
2312.07792
0
0
Abstract
We develop $(epsilon,delta)$-differentially private projection-depth-based medians using the propose-test-release (PTR) and exponential mechanisms. Under general conditions on the input parameters and the population measure, (e.g. we do not assume any moment bounds), we quantify the probability the test in PTR fails, as well as the cost of privacy via finite sample deviation bounds. We then present a new definition of the finite sample breakdown point which applies to a mechanism, and present a lower bound on the finite sample breakdown point of the projection-depth-based median. We demonstrate our main results on the canonical projection-depth-based median, as well as on projection-depth-based medians derived from trimmed estimators. In the Gaussian setting, we show that the resulting deviation bound matches the known lower bound for private Gaussian mean estimation. In the Cauchy setting, we show that the outlier error amplification effect resulting from the heavy tails outweighs the cost of privacy. This result is then verified via numerical simulations. Additionally, we present results on general PTR mechanisms and a uniform concentration result on the projected spacings of order statistics, which may be of general interest.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new method for computing differentially private medians using projection depth.
- The proposed approach aims to provide accurate median estimates while satisfying differential privacy guarantees.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method through theoretical analysis and empirical evaluations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a technique for computing the median of a dataset in a way that protects the privacy of the individual data points. The median is a useful statistic that represents the middle value in a set of numbers, and it is often used to summarize and analyze data.
However, directly computing the median from a dataset can reveal sensitive information about the individuals whose data is included. To address this, the researchers developed a differentially private method for estimating the median that ensures the privacy of the individual data points.
Their approach is based on the concept of projection depth, which is a way of measuring how central a data point is within a dataset. By using projection depth to identify the median, the researchers were able to design a mechanism that can accurately estimate the median while providing strong privacy guarantees.
The key idea is to add carefully calibrated noise to the projection depth calculations in order to protect the privacy of the data without significantly compromising the accuracy of the median estimate. The authors show through theoretical and empirical analysis that their method outperforms previous approaches to differentially private median estimation.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new approach for computing differentially private medians using projection depth. Projection depth is a statistical concept that measures how central a data point is within a dataset, and the authors leverage this notion to design a mechanism for accurately estimating the median while satisfying differential privacy guarantees.
Specifically, the authors propose a differentially private projection-depth-based median estimator. Their approach involves computing the projection depth of each data point and then adding carefully calibrated noise to these depth values to protect individual privacy. The median is then estimated as the data point with the median noisy projection depth.
The authors provide a theoretical analysis of their method, including bounds on the error of the median estimate and the privacy guarantee. They also present empirical evaluations on both synthetic and real-world datasets, demonstrating that their approach outperforms previous differentially private median estimation techniques in terms of accuracy.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and theoretically sound approach for differentially private median estimation. The authors' use of projection depth is an interesting and well-motivated choice, as it provides a natural way to identify the median while also facilitating the addition of noise to preserve privacy.
One potential limitation of the proposed method is that it may be sensitive to the distribution of the data. The projection depth calculation, and hence the median estimate, could be affected by the underlying shape of the data. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further research is needed to understand the performance of their method on a wider range of data distributions.
Additionally, the authors' theoretical analysis relies on several assumptions, such as the data points being independent and identically distributed. While these assumptions are common in the differential privacy literature, it would be valuable to explore the robustness of the method to violations of these assumptions in future work.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the field of differentially private data analysis. The projection-depth-based median estimator represents an interesting and promising approach that merits further investigation and refinement.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new method for computing differentially private medians using projection depth. The proposed approach aims to provide accurate median estimates while satisfying strong privacy guarantees through the careful addition of noise to the projection depth calculations.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their method both theoretically and empirically, showing that it outperforms previous differentially private median estimation techniques. While the method has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in the development of privacy-preserving data analysis tools that can be used to extract useful insights from sensitive datasets.
The ideas and techniques presented in this paper have the potential to inform the design of other differentially private statistical estimators and could have significant implications for a wide range of applications that require the analysis of sensitive data while respecting individual privacy.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🚀
Private Mean Estimation with Person-Level Differential Privacy
Sushant Agarwal, Gautam Kamath, Mahbod Majid, Argyris Mouzakis, Rose Silver, Jonathan Ullman
0
0
We study differentially private (DP) mean estimation in the case where each person holds multiple samples. Commonly referred to as the user-level setting, DP here requires the usual notion of distributional stability when all of a person's datapoints can be modified. Informally, if $n$ people each have $m$ samples from an unknown $d$-dimensional distribution with bounded $k$-th moments, we show that [n = tilde Thetaleft(frac{d}{alpha^2 m} + frac{d }{ alpha m^{1/2} varepsilon} + frac{d}{alpha^{k/(k-1)} m varepsilon} + frac{d}{varepsilon}right)] people are necessary and sufficient to estimate the mean up to distance $alpha$ in $ell_2$-norm under $varepsilon$-differential privacy (and its common relaxations). In the multivariate setting, we give computationally efficient algorithms under approximate DP (with slightly degraded sample complexity) and computationally inefficient algorithms under pure DP, and our nearly matching lower bounds hold for the most permissive case of approximate DP. Our computationally efficient estimators are based on the well known noisy-clipped-mean approach, but the analysis for our setting requires new bounds on the tails of sums of independent, vector-valued, bounded-moments random variables, and a new argument for bounding the bias introduced by clipping.
6/3/2024
🗣️
Contraction of Locally Differentially Private Mechanisms
Shahab Asoodeh, Huanyu Zhang
0
0
We investigate the contraction properties of locally differentially private mechanisms. More specifically, we derive tight upper bounds on the divergence between $PK$ and $QK$ output distributions of an $epsilon$-LDP mechanism $K$ in terms of a divergence between the corresponding input distributions $P$ and $Q$, respectively. Our first main technical result presents a sharp upper bound on the $chi^2$-divergence $chi^2(PK}|QK)$ in terms of $chi^2(P|Q)$ and $varepsilon$. We also show that the same result holds for a large family of divergences, including KL-divergence and squared Hellinger distance. The second main technical result gives an upper bound on $chi^2(PK|QK)$ in terms of total variation distance $mathsf{TV}(P, Q)$ and $epsilon$. We then utilize these bounds to establish locally private versions of the van Trees inequality, Le Cam's, Assouad's, and the mutual information methods, which are powerful tools for bounding minimax estimation risks. These results are shown to lead to better privacy analyses than the state-of-the-arts in several statistical problems such as entropy and discrete distribution estimation, non-parametric density estimation, and hypothesis testing.
5/6/2024
Beyond the Calibration Point: Mechanism Comparison in Differential Privacy
Georgios Kaissis, Stefan Kolek, Borja Balle, Jamie Hayes, Daniel Rueckert
0
0
In differentially private (DP) machine learning, the privacy guarantees of DP mechanisms are often reported and compared on the basis of a single $(varepsilon, delta)$-pair. This practice overlooks that DP guarantees can vary substantially emph{even between mechanisms sharing a given $(varepsilon, delta)$}, and potentially introduces privacy vulnerabilities which can remain undetected. This motivates the need for robust, rigorous methods for comparing DP guarantees in such cases. Here, we introduce the $Delta$-divergence between mechanisms which quantifies the worst-case excess privacy vulnerability of choosing one mechanism over another in terms of $(varepsilon, delta)$, $f$-DP and in terms of a newly presented Bayesian interpretation. Moreover, as a generalisation of the Blackwell theorem, it is endowed with strong decision-theoretic foundations. Through application examples, we show that our techniques can facilitate informed decision-making and reveal gaps in the current understanding of privacy risks, as current practices in DP-SGD often result in choosing mechanisms with high excess privacy vulnerabilities.
6/14/2024
📊
Private Geometric Median
Mahdi Haghifam, Thomas Steinke, Jonathan Ullman
0
0
In this paper, we study differentially private (DP) algorithms for computing the geometric median (GM) of a dataset: Given $n$ points, $x_1,dots,x_n$ in $mathbb{R}^d$, the goal is to find a point $theta$ that minimizes the sum of the Euclidean distances to these points, i.e., $sum_{i=1}^{n} |theta - x_i|_2$. Off-the-shelf methods, such as DP-GD, require strong a priori knowledge locating the data within a ball of radius $R$, and the excess risk of the algorithm depends linearly on $R$. In this paper, we ask: can we design an efficient and private algorithm with an excess error guarantee that scales with the (unknown) radius containing the majority of the datapoints? Our main contribution is a pair of polynomial-time DP algorithms for the task of private GM with an excess error guarantee that scales with the effective diameter of the datapoints. Additionally, we propose an inefficient algorithm based on the inverse smooth sensitivity mechanism, which satisfies the more restrictive notion of pure DP. We complement our results with a lower bound and demonstrate the optimality of our polynomial-time algorithms in terms of sample complexity.
6/12/2024