Contrastive Learning with Counterfactual Explanations for Radiology Report Generation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a contrastive learning approach for generating radiology reports that provide counterfactual explanations.
- The key idea is to train the model to generate reports that not only accurately describe the medical images, but also explain how the report would change if certain attributes of the image were different.
- This allows the model to provide insights into its reasoning and decision-making process, making the reports more transparent and interpretable.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers developed a new way to generate medical reports for radiology images, such as X-rays or CT scans. Typical medical report generation models simply describe what they see in the image. However, this new approach goes a step further by also explaining how the report would change if certain details in the image were different.
For example, if the model describes a finding of a lung nodule in the image, it would also explain how the report would differ if the nodule was smaller or in a different location. This provides valuable insight into the model's decision-making process and makes the reports more transparent and easy to understand.
The key innovation is the use of contrastive learning, which trains the model to not only generate accurate reports, but also to identify the important features in the image that led to the report. By learning these counterfactual relationships, the model can provide explanations for its outputs.
This approach could be very helpful for medical professionals, as it allows them to better understand the reasoning behind the model's reports and assess their reliability. It also has the potential to improve trust in AI-generated medical reports, which is crucial for widespread adoption in clinical settings.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a contrastive learning framework for radiology report generation that can provide counterfactual explanations. The model is trained to not only generate accurate reports describing the medical images, but also to identify the key features in the image that led to the report and explain how the report would change if those features were different.
The architecture consists of an encoder-decoder model with an additional contrastive loss function. The encoder takes the medical image as input and produces a latent representation. The decoder then generates the corresponding radiology report. The contrastive loss encourages the model to learn a latent representation that captures the important features in the image and their relationships to the report.
During inference, the model can generate counterfactual reports by perturbing the latent representation to simulate changes in the image attributes. This allows the model to explain how the report would differ if certain characteristics of the image were altered.
The researchers evaluate their approach on several radiology report datasets and find that it outperforms baseline models in terms of report accuracy and the quality of the counterfactual explanations provided. They also conduct qualitative analysis to demonstrate the interpretability of the generated reports.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach for making radiology report generation models more transparent and interpretable. The ability to provide counterfactual explanations is a valuable feature that can build trust in AI-generated medical reports and help clinicians better understand the model's decision-making.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research. For example, it's unclear how the model would perform on more complex or ambiguous medical images, where the counterfactual explanations may be more challenging to generate. Additionally, the paper does not explore the model's robustness to distribution shift or its ability to generalize to unseen medical conditions.
Further research could also investigate the clinical utility of the counterfactual explanations and how they are interpreted by medical professionals. Integrating this approach with existing clinical workflows and decision-making processes would be an important next step.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a contrastive learning framework for radiology report generation that can provide counterfactual explanations. By training the model to not only generate accurate reports, but also explain how those reports would change under different image conditions, the approach offers valuable transparency and interpretability.
The ability to generate counterfactual explanations has the potential to improve trust in AI-assisted medical diagnosis and decision-making, which is crucial for the widespread adoption of these technologies in clinical settings. While the paper presents promising results, further research is needed to fully understand the model's capabilities and limitations in real-world medical scenarios.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Contrastive Learning with Counterfactual Explanations for Radiology Report Generation
Mingjie Li, Haokun Lin, Liang Qiu, Xiaodan Liang, Ling Chen, Abdulmotaleb Elsaddik, Xiaojun Chang
Due to the common content of anatomy, radiology images with their corresponding reports exhibit high similarity. Such inherent data bias can predispose automatic report generation models to learn entangled and spurious representations resulting in misdiagnostic reports. To tackle these, we propose a novel textbf{Co}untertextbf{F}actual textbf{E}xplanations-based framework (CoFE) for radiology report generation. Counterfactual explanations serve as a potent tool for understanding how decisions made by algorithms can be changed by asking ``what if'' scenarios. By leveraging this concept, CoFE can learn non-spurious visual representations by contrasting the representations between factual and counterfactual images. Specifically, we derive counterfactual images by swapping a patch between positive and negative samples until a predicted diagnosis shift occurs. Here, positive and negative samples are the most semantically similar but have different diagnosis labels. Additionally, CoFE employs a learnable prompt to efficiently fine-tune the pre-trained large language model, encapsulating both factual and counterfactual content to provide a more generalizable prompt representation. Extensive experiments on two benchmarks demonstrate that leveraging the counterfactual explanations enables CoFE to generate semantically coherent and factually complete reports and outperform in terms of language generation and clinical efficacy metrics.
Read more7/22/2024
🛸
0
Rethinking Radiology Report Generation via Causal Inspired Counterfactual Augmentation
Xiao Song, Jiafan Liu, Yun Li, Yan Liu, Wenbin Lei, Ruxin Wang
Radiology Report Generation (RRG) draws attention as a vision-and-language interaction of biomedical fields. Previous works inherited the ideology of traditional language generation tasks, aiming to generate paragraphs with high readability as reports. Despite significant progress, the independence between diseases-a specific property of RRG-was neglected, yielding the models being confused by the co-occurrence of diseases brought on by the biased data distribution, thus generating inaccurate reports. In this paper, to rethink this issue, we first model the causal effects between the variables from a causal perspective, through which we prove that the co-occurrence relationships between diseases on the biased distribution function as confounders, confusing the accuracy through two backdoor paths, i.e. the Joint Vision Coupling and the Conditional Sequential Coupling. Then, we proposed a novel model-agnostic counterfactual augmentation method that contains two strategies, i.e. the Prototype-based Counterfactual Sample Synthesis (P-CSS) and the Magic-Cube-like Counterfactual Report Reconstruction (Cube), to intervene the backdoor paths, thus enhancing the accuracy and generalization of RRG models. Experimental results on the widely used MIMIC-CXR dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method. Additionally, a generalization performance is evaluated on IU X-Ray dataset, which verifies our work can effectively reduce the impact of co-occurrences caused by different distributions on the results.
Read more7/31/2024
⛏️
0
Counterfactual Editing for Search Result Explanation
Zhichao Xu, Hemank Lamba, Qingyao Ai, Joel Tetreault, Alex Jaimes
Search Result Explanation (SeRE) aims to improve search sessions' effectiveness and efficiency by helping users interpret documents' relevance. Existing works mostly focus on factual explanation, i.e. to find/generate supporting evidence about documents' relevance to search queries. However, research in cognitive sciences has shown that human explanations are contrastive i.e. people explain an observed event using some counterfactual events; such explanations reduce cognitive load and provide actionable insights. Though already proven effective in machine learning and NLP communities, there lacks a strict formulation on how counterfactual explanations should be defined and structured, in the context of web search. In this paper, we first discuss the possible formulation of counterfactual explanations in the IR context. Next, we formulate a suite of desiderata for counterfactual explanation in SeRE task and corresponding automatic metrics. With this desiderata, we propose a method named textbf{C}ountertextbf{F}actual textbf{E}diting for Search Research textbf{E}xplanation (textbf{CFE2}). CFE2 provides pairwise counterfactual explanations for document pairs within a search engine result page. Our experiments on five public search datasets demonstrate that CFE2 can significantly outperform baselines in both automatic metrics and human evaluations.
Read more7/2/2024
🖼️
0
New!Robust image representations with counterfactual contrastive learning
M'elanie Roschewitz, Fabio De Sousa Ribeiro, Tian Xia, Galvin Khara, Ben Glocker
Contrastive pretraining can substantially increase model generalisation and downstream performance. However, the quality of the learned representations is highly dependent on the data augmentation strategy applied to generate positive pairs. Positive contrastive pairs should preserve semantic meaning while discarding unwanted variations related to the data acquisition domain. Traditional contrastive pipelines attempt to simulate domain shifts through pre-defined generic image transformations. However, these do not always mimic realistic and relevant domain variations for medical imaging such as scanner differences. To tackle this issue, we herein introduce counterfactual contrastive learning, a novel framework leveraging recent advances in causal image synthesis to create contrastive positive pairs that faithfully capture relevant domain variations. Our method, evaluated across five datasets encompassing both chest radiography and mammography data, for two established contrastive objectives (SimCLR and DINO-v2), outperforms standard contrastive learning in terms of robustness to acquisition shift. Notably, counterfactual contrastive learning achieves superior downstream performance on both in-distribution and on external datasets, especially for images acquired with scanners under-represented in the training set. Further experiments show that the proposed framework extends beyond acquisition shifts, with models trained with counterfactual contrastive learning substantially improving subgroup performance across biological sex.
Read more9/17/2024