Control+Shift: Generating Controllable Distribution Shifts

Read original: arXiv:2409.07940 - Published 9/14/2024 by Roy Friedman, Rhea Chowers
Total Score

0

Control+Shift: Generating Controllable Distribution Shifts

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a method called "Control+Shift" for generating controllable distribution shifts in data.
  • The goal is to enable researchers and practitioners to test the robustness of machine learning models to distribution shifts.
  • The approach allows for generating shifts in specific characteristics of the data distribution, such as mean, variance, or correlation structure.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a technique called "Control+Shift" that allows researchers to intentionally create changes or "shifts" in the distribution of their data. This is important because machine learning models can perform poorly when the real-world data they're tested on differs from the data they were trained on. By generating these shifts in a controlled way, the researchers can assess how robust their models are to different types of distribution changes that may occur in the real world.

For example, imagine you're training a model to classify images of animals. If your training data only contains images of animals on green grass, the model might learn to associate the green color with the presence of an animal. But in the real world, animals may appear in a variety of settings, not just on green grass. The "Control+Shift" method would allow you to intentionally change the color, texture, or other characteristics of the images, so you can see how well your model performs when the distribution of the data shifts away from what it was trained on.

By giving researchers more control over the distribution shifts in their data, the "Control+Shift" approach helps them better understand the limitations and weaknesses of their machine learning models, and work to improve the models' robustness to real-world changes.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a method called "Control+Shift" that allows for the generation of controllable distribution shifts in data. The key idea is to leverage invertible neural networks (INNs) to transform the original data distribution into a target distribution with specific desired characteristics.

The authors first train an INN to map the original data distribution to a Gaussian distribution. They then apply a shift operation to the Gaussian latent representation, changing the mean, variance, or correlation structure. Finally, they use the inverse of the INN to map the shifted Gaussian back to the target data distribution.

This approach gives the user fine-grained control over the type and degree of distribution shift, enabling systematic evaluation of model robustness. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of Control+Shift on several synthetic and real-world datasets, showing that it can generate diverse and realistic distribution shifts.

Critical Analysis

The Control+Shift method provides a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners to study the robustness of machine learning models. By allowing for the generation of targeted distribution shifts, it helps identify the vulnerabilities of models and guides efforts to improve their performance in the face of real-world data changes.

That said, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the approach. For example, the quality and realism of the generated distribution shifts may be constrained by the expressiveness of the INN architecture and the fidelity of the Gaussian approximation. Additionally, the method may struggle to capture more complex or multi-modal distribution shifts that cannot be easily characterized by changes in simple statistics like mean and variance.

Further research could explore extensions to the Control+Shift framework, such as incorporating more flexible latent representations or considering shifts in higher-order data characteristics. Validating the method's effectiveness on a wider range of real-world applications would also strengthen the claims about its practical utility.

Conclusion

The Control+Shift method presented in this paper offers a powerful and flexible approach for generating controllable distribution shifts in data. By enabling targeted modifications to the data distribution, it provides researchers with a valuable tool for systematically evaluating the robustness of machine learning models. This can lead to the development of more reliable and resilient AI systems that can better handle the unpredictable changes encountered in real-world deployment scenarios.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Control+Shift: Generating Controllable Distribution Shifts
Total Score

0

Control+Shift: Generating Controllable Distribution Shifts

Roy Friedman, Rhea Chowers

We propose a new method for generating realistic datasets with distribution shifts using any decoder-based generative model. Our approach systematically creates datasets with varying intensities of distribution shifts, facilitating a comprehensive analysis of model performance degradation. We then use these generated datasets to evaluate the performance of various commonly used networks and observe a consistent decline in performance with increasing shift intensity, even when the effect is almost perceptually unnoticeable to the human eye. We see this degradation even when using data augmentations. We also find that enlarging the training dataset beyond a certain point has no effect on the robustness and that stronger inductive biases increase robustness.

Read more

9/14/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

DC4L: Distribution Shift Recovery via Data-Driven Control for Deep Learning Models

Vivian Lin, Kuk Jin Jang, Souradeep Dutta, Michele Caprio, Oleg Sokolsky, Insup Lee

Deep neural networks have repeatedly been shown to be non-robust to the uncertainties of the real world, even to naturally occurring ones. A vast majority of current approaches have focused on data-augmentation methods to expand the range of perturbations that the classifier is exposed to while training. A relatively unexplored avenue that is equally promising involves sanitizing an image as a preprocessing step, depending on the nature of perturbation. In this paper, we propose to use control for learned models to recover from distribution shifts online. Specifically, our method applies a sequence of semantic-preserving transformations to bring the shifted data closer in distribution to the training set, as measured by the Wasserstein distance. Our approach is to 1) formulate the problem of distribution shift recovery as a Markov decision process, which we solve using reinforcement learning, 2) identify a minimum condition on the data for our method to be applied, which we check online using a binary classifier, and 3) employ dimensionality reduction through orthonormal projection to aid in our estimates of the Wasserstein distance. We provide theoretical evidence that orthonormal projection preserves characteristics of the data at the distributional level. We apply our distribution shift recovery approach to the ImageNet-C benchmark for distribution shifts, demonstrating an improvement in average accuracy of up to 14.21% across a variety of state-of-the-art ImageNet classifiers. We further show that our method generalizes to composites of shifts from the ImageNet-C benchmark, achieving improvements in average accuracy of up to 9.81%. Finally, we test our method on CIFAR-100-C and report improvements of up to 8.25%.

Read more

5/17/2024

💬

Total Score

0

On the Need of a Modeling Language for Distribution Shifts: Illustrations on Tabular Datasets

Jiashuo Liu, Tianyu Wang, Peng Cui, Hongseok Namkoong

Different distribution shifts require different interventions, and algorithms must be grounded in the specific shifts they address. However, methodological development for robust algorithms typically relies on structural assumptions that lack empirical validation. Advocating for an empirically grounded data-driven approach to research, we build an empirical testbed comprising natural shifts across 5 tabular datasets and 60,000 method configurations encompassing imbalanced learning and distributionally robust optimization (DRO) methods. We find $Y|X$-shifts are most prevalent on our testbed, in stark contrast to the heavy focus on $X$ (covariate)-shifts in the ML literature. The performance of robust algorithms varies significantly over shift types, and is no better than that of vanilla methods. To understand why, we conduct an in-depth empirical analysis of DRO methods and find that although often neglected by researchers, implementation details -- such as the choice of underlying model class (e.g., XGBoost) and hyperparameter selection -- have a bigger impact on performance than the ambiguity set or its radius. To further bridge that gap between methodological research and practice, we design case studies that illustrate how such a data-driven, inductive understanding of distribution shifts can enhance both data-centric and algorithmic interventions.

Read more

7/15/2024

🔮

Total Score

0

Prediction Accuracy & Reliability: Classification and Object Localization under Distribution Shift

Fabian Diet, Moussa Kassem Sbeyti, Michelle Karg

Natural distribution shift causes a deterioration in the perception performance of convolutional neural networks (CNNs). This comprehensive analysis for real-world traffic data addresses: 1) investigating the effect of natural distribution shift and weather augmentations on both detection quality and confidence estimation, 2) evaluating model performance for both classification and object localization, and 3) benchmarking two common uncertainty quantification methods - Ensembles and different variants of Monte-Carlo (MC) Dropout - under natural and close-to-natural distribution shift. For this purpose, a novel dataset has been curated from publicly available autonomous driving datasets. The in-distribution (ID) data is based on cutouts of a single object, for which both class and bounding box annotations are available. The six distribution-shift datasets cover adverse weather scenarios, simulated rain and fog, corner cases, and out-of-distribution data. A granular analysis of CNNs under distribution shift allows to quantize the impact of different types of shifts on both, task performance and confidence estimation: ConvNeXt-Tiny is more robust than EfficientNet-B0; heavy rain degrades classification stronger than localization, contrary to heavy fog; integrating MC-Dropout into selected layers only has the potential to enhance task performance and confidence estimation, whereby the identification of these layers depends on the type of distribution shift and the considered task.

Read more

9/6/2024