Fairness Hub Technical Briefs: Definition and Detection of Distribution Shift
0
🔎
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Distribution shift is a common problem in machine learning where the training data differs from the real-world data used for the model.
- This can lead to reduced model performance due to factors like non-representative sampling, environmental changes, or new scenarios.
- This paper focuses on defining and detecting distribution shifts in educational settings, specifically for standard prediction tasks.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models are trained on data, but sometimes the data used for training is different from the real-world data the model is applied to. This is called a distribution shift. Imagine you have a model that predicts student test scores - it might be trained on data from one school district, but then used in a different district with different demographics and teaching methods. The model won't work as well because the new data doesn't match the training data.
Distribution shifts can happen for lots of reasons, like sampling issues, changes in the environment, or the model being used in new scenarios it wasn't designed for. This paper looks at how to define and detect these distribution shifts in educational settings, where the task is to build a model that takes in student data and predicts their test scores or other outcomes.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on standard prediction problems, where the goal is to train a model Y = f(X) that takes in a set of input features X=(x1, x2, ..., xm) and produces an output Y. The key challenge is when the distribution of the real-world input data X differs from the training data, leading to reduced model performance.
The paper explores methods for detecting these distribution shifts, which are crucial for understanding when a model may no longer be reliable. By identifying distribution shifts, the model can be updated or replaced to maintain accurate predictions in the face of changing real-world conditions.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a solid framework for defining and detecting distribution shifts in educational machine learning tasks. However, it primarily focuses on standard prediction problems and may not address more complex settings like time-series forecasting or large language models.
Additionally, while the paper discusses methods for shift detection, it does not delve into strategies for adapting models to distribution shifts. Further research could explore techniques for making models more robust and resilient to changing data distributions.
Conclusion
This paper offers valuable insights into the challenge of distribution shift in machine learning, with a focus on educational prediction tasks. By understanding how to define and detect these shifts, researchers and practitioners can work to build more reliable and adaptable models that maintain high performance even as real-world data changes over time. Continued exploration of this area could lead to significant improvements in the practical deployment of machine learning in sensitive domains like education.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
0
Fairness Hub Technical Briefs: Definition and Detection of Distribution Shift
Nicolas Acevedo, Carmen Cortez, Chris Brooks, Rene Kizilcec, Renzhe Yu
Distribution shift is a common situation in machine learning tasks, where the data used for training a model is different from the data the model is applied to in the real world. This issue arises across multiple technical settings: from standard prediction tasks, to time-series forecasting, and to more recent applications of large language models (LLMs). This mismatch can lead to performance reductions, and can be related to a multiplicity of factors: sampling issues and non-representative data, changes in the environment or policies, or the emergence of previously unseen scenarios. This brief focuses on the definition and detection of distribution shifts in educational settings. We focus on standard prediction problems, where the task is to learn a model that takes in a series of input (predictors) $X=(x_1,x_2,...,x_m)$ and produces an output $Y=f(X)$.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Supervised Algorithmic Fairness in Distribution Shifts: A Survey
Minglai Shao, Dong Li, Chen Zhao, Xintao Wu, Yujie Lin, Qin Tian
Supervised fairness-aware machine learning under distribution shifts is an emerging field that addresses the challenge of maintaining equitable and unbiased predictions when faced with changes in data distributions from source to target domains. In real-world applications, machine learning models are often trained on a specific dataset but deployed in environments where the data distribution may shift over time due to various factors. This shift can lead to unfair predictions, disproportionately affecting certain groups characterized by sensitive attributes, such as race and gender. In this survey, we provide a summary of various types of distribution shifts and comprehensively investigate existing methods based on these shifts, highlighting six commonly used approaches in the literature. Additionally, this survey lists publicly available datasets and evaluation metrics for empirical studies. We further explore the interconnection with related research fields, discuss the significant challenges, and identify potential directions for future studies.
Read more5/7/2024
0
Beyond Discrepancy: A Closer Look at the Theory of Distribution Shift
Robi Bhattacharjee, Nick Rittler, Kamalika Chaudhuri
Many machine learning models appear to deploy effortlessly under distribution shift, and perform well on a target distribution that is considerably different from the training distribution. Yet, learning theory of distribution shift bounds performance on the target distribution as a function of the discrepancy between the source and target, rarely guaranteeing high target accuracy. Motivated by this gap, this work takes a closer look at the theory of distribution shift for a classifier from a source to a target distribution. Instead of relying on the discrepancy, we adopt an Invariant-Risk-Minimization (IRM)-like assumption connecting the distributions, and characterize conditions under which data from a source distribution is sufficient for accurate classification of the target. When these conditions are not met, we show when only unlabeled data from the target is sufficient, and when labeled target data is needed. In all cases, we provide rigorous theoretical guarantees in the large sample regime.
Read more5/30/2024
0
Data Distribution Shifts in (Industrial) Federated Learning as a Privacy Issue
David Brunner, Alessio Montuoro
We consider industrial federated learning, a collaboration between a small number of powerful, potentially competing industrial players, mediated by a third party aspiring to improve the service it provides to its customers. We argue that this configuration harbours covert privacy risks that do not arise in e.g. cross-device settings. Companies are very protective of their intellectual property and production processes. Information about changes to their production and the timing of which is to be kept private. We study a scenario in which one of the collaborators infers changes to their competitors' production by detecting potentially subtle temporal data distribution shifts. In this framing, a data distribution shift is always problematic, even if it has no negative effect on training convergence. Thus, our goal is to find means that allow the detection of distributional shifts better than customary evaluation metrics. Based on the assumption that even minor shifts translate into the collaboratively learned machine learning model, the attacker tracks the shared models' internal state with a selection of metrics from literature in order to pick up on relevant changes. In an empirical study on benchmark datasets, we show an honest-but-curious attacker to be capable of detecting subtle distributional shifts on other clients, in some cases long before they become obvious in evaluation.
Read more9/24/2024