Convergence of Implicit Gradient Descent for Training Two-Layer Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Read original: arXiv:2407.02827 - Published 8/13/2024 by Xianliang Xu, Ting Du, Wang Kong, Ye Li, Zhongyi Huang
Total Score

0

🏋️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the convergence properties of implicit gradient descent for training two-layer physics-informed neural networks (PINNs).
  • PINNs are a type of neural network that incorporates physical constraints or prior knowledge into the model to improve its performance on tasks related to physical systems.
  • The authors analyze the convergence of implicit gradient descent, a optimization technique that can be more effective than traditional gradient descent for training PINNs.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks are a powerful tool for solving a wide range of problems, from image recognition to language processing. However, when it comes to physical systems, such as fluid dynamics or structural mechanics, standard neural networks may struggle to capture the underlying physical laws and constraints.

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are a type of neural network that aims to address this issue. PINNs incorporate physical knowledge directly into the model, helping it better learn the governing equations and boundary conditions of the physical system.

In this paper, the authors focus on the convergence properties of a optimization technique called implicit gradient descent when training two-layer PINNs. Implicit gradient descent is a variant of the standard gradient descent algorithm that can be more effective for certain types of neural networks, including PINNs.

The key idea is that by explicitly encoding the physical constraints into the neural network architecture and loss function, the optimization process can converge more quickly and reliably than traditional approaches. This is especially important for PINNs, which often have complex loss landscapes due to the physical constraints.

The authors provide a detailed theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of implicit gradient descent for two-layer PINNs, offering insights into the conditions under which this optimization technique can outperform standard gradient descent.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of implicit gradient descent for training two-layer physics-informed neural networks (PINNs).

The authors first introduce the general PINN framework, which incorporates physical constraints and prior knowledge into the neural network architecture and loss function. They then describe the implicit gradient descent algorithm, which updates the model parameters using the solution to an implicit equation rather than the standard gradient.

Through a series of mathematical proofs and lemmas, the authors establish convergence guarantees for implicit gradient descent when applied to two-layer PINNs. Specifically, they show that under certain conditions, including the smoothness of the activation function and the strength of the physical constraints, implicit gradient descent converges linearly to the optimal parameters.

The authors also provide insights into the role of the physical constraints in the convergence of implicit gradient descent. They demonstrate that stronger physical constraints can lead to faster convergence, as the optimization process is guided more effectively towards the desired solution.

Furthermore, the paper discusses the advantages of implicit gradient descent over traditional gradient-based optimization methods for training PINNs. The authors argue that implicit gradient descent can be more effective in navigating the complex loss landscapes often encountered in PINN training, leading to faster and more reliable convergence.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of implicit gradient descent for two-layer PINNs, which is a valuable contribution to the literature on this topic.

One potential limitation of the research is that it is focused solely on two-layer PINNs. While this simplifies the analysis, it may not fully capture the complexity of real-world PINN architectures, which often involve deeper networks and more intricate physical constraints.

Additionally, the paper assumes certain conditions, such as the smoothness of the activation function and the strength of the physical constraints, which may not always hold in practice. It would be interesting to see how the convergence guarantees might change under more relaxed or realistic assumptions.

Furthermore, the paper does not provide any empirical validation of the theoretical results. While the mathematical analysis is sound, it would be helpful to see how the implicit gradient descent algorithm performs in practice, especially in comparison to other optimization techniques for PINNs, such as incremental Gauss-Newton methods or feature-enforcing techniques.

Despite these limitations, the paper offers valuable insights into the convergence behavior of implicit gradient descent for PINNs, which could inform the development of more efficient and reliable training algorithms for this important class of neural networks.

Conclusion

This paper provides a detailed theoretical analysis of the convergence properties of implicit gradient descent for training two-layer physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). The authors demonstrate that under certain conditions, implicit gradient descent can converge linearly to the optimal parameters, with the physical constraints playing a key role in the convergence process.

The findings of this research contribute to the growing body of work on optimization techniques for PINNs, which are increasingly important for solving complex physical problems that require the integration of domain-specific knowledge into neural network models. While the analysis is limited to two-layer PINNs, the insights gained could inform the development of more advanced PINN architectures and training algorithms in the future.

By understanding the convergence behavior of implicit gradient descent for PINNs, researchers and practitioners can design more effective and reliable methods for training these models, ultimately leading to improved performance on a wide range of physical and engineering applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏋️

Total Score

0

Convergence of Implicit Gradient Descent for Training Two-Layer Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Xianliang Xu, Ting Du, Wang Kong, Ye Li, Zhongyi Huang

Optimization algorithms are crucial in training physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), as unsuitable methods may lead to poor solutions. Compared to the common gradient descent (GD) algorithm, implicit gradient descent (IGD) outperforms it in handling certain multi-scale problems. In this paper, we provide convergence analysis for the IGD in training over-parameterized two-layer PINNs. We first demonstrate the positive definiteness of Gram matrices for some general smooth activation functions, such as sigmoidal function, softplus function, tanh function, and others. Then, over-parameterization allows us to prove that the randomly initialized IGD converges a globally optimal solution at a linear convergence rate. Moreover, due to the distinct training dynamics of IGD compared to GD, the learning rate can be selected independently of the sample size and the least eigenvalue of the Gram matrix. Additionally, the novel approach used in our convergence analysis imposes a milder requirement on the network width. Finally, empirical results validate our theoretical findings.

Read more

8/13/2024

🌿

Total Score

0

Convergence Analysis of Natural Gradient Descent for Over-parameterized Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Xianliang Xu, Ting Du, Wang Kong, Ye Li, Zhongyi Huang

First-order methods, such as gradient descent (GD) and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), have been proven effective in training neural networks. In the context of over-parameterization, there is a line of work demonstrating that randomly initialized (stochastic) gradient descent converges to a globally optimal solution at a linear convergence rate for the quadratic loss function. However, the learning rate of GD for training two-layer neural networks exhibits poor dependence on the sample size and the Gram matrix, leading to a slow training process. In this paper, we show that for the $L^2$ regression problems, the learning rate can be improved from $mathcal{O}(lambda_0/n^2)$ to $mathcal{O}(1/|bm{H}^{infty}|_2)$, which implies that GD actually enjoys a faster convergence rate. Furthermore, we generalize the method to GD in training two-layer Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), showing a similar improvement for the learning rate. Although the improved learning rate has a mild dependence on the Gram matrix, we still need to set it small enough in practice due to the unknown eigenvalues of the Gram matrix. More importantly, the convergence rate is tied to the least eigenvalue of the Gram matrix, which can lead to slow convergence. In this work, we provide the convergence analysis of natural gradient descent (NGD) in training two-layer PINNs, demonstrating that the learning rate can be $mathcal{O}(1)$, and at this rate, the convergence rate is independent of the Gram matrix.

Read more

8/7/2024

GradINN: Gradient Informed Neural Network
Total Score

0

GradINN: Gradient Informed Neural Network

Filippo Aglietti, Francesco Della Santa, Andrea Piano, Virginia Aglietti

We propose Gradient Informed Neural Networks (GradINNs), a methodology inspired by Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) that can be used to efficiently approximate a wide range of physical systems for which the underlying governing equations are completely unknown or cannot be defined, a condition that is often met in complex engineering problems. GradINNs leverage prior beliefs about a system's gradient to constrain the predicted function's gradient across all input dimensions. This is achieved using two neural networks: one modeling the target function and an auxiliary network expressing prior beliefs, e.g., smoothness. A customized loss function enables training the first network while enforcing gradient constraints derived from the auxiliary network. We demonstrate the advantages of GradINNs, particularly in low-data regimes, on diverse problems spanning non time-dependent systems (Friedman function, Stokes Flow) and time-dependent systems (Lotka-Volterra, Burger's equation). Experimental results showcase strong performance compared to standard neural networks and PINN-like approaches across all tested scenarios.

Read more

9/4/2024

Data-Guided Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations
Total Score

0

Data-Guided Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Solving Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations

Wei Zhou, Y. F. Xu

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) represent a significant advancement in scientific machine learning by integrating fundamental physical laws into their architecture through loss functions. PINNs have been successfully applied to solve various forward and inverse problems in partial differential equations (PDEs). However, a notable challenge can emerge during the early training stages when solving inverse problems. Specifically, data losses remain high while PDE residual losses are minimized rapidly, thereby exacerbating the imbalance between loss terms and impeding the overall efficiency of PINNs. To address this challenge, this study proposes a novel framework termed data-guided physics-informed neural networks (DG-PINNs). The DG-PINNs framework is structured into two distinct phases: a pre-training phase and a fine-tuning phase. In the pre-training phase, a loss function with only the data loss is minimized in a neural network. In the fine-tuning phase, a composite loss function, which consists of the data loss, PDE residual loss, and, if available, initial and boundary condition losses, is minimized in the same neural network. Notably, the pre-training phase ensures that the data loss is already at a low value before the fine-tuning phase commences. This approach enables the fine-tuning phase to converge to a minimal composite loss function with fewer iterations compared to existing PINNs. To validate the effectiveness, noise-robustness, and efficiency of DG-PINNs, extensive numerical investigations are conducted on inverse problems related to several classical PDEs, including the heat equation, wave equation, Euler--Bernoulli beam equation, and Navier--Stokes equation. The numerical results demonstrate that DG-PINNs can accurately solve these inverse problems and exhibit robustness against noise in training data.

Read more

7/16/2024