Corpus Considerations for Annotator Modeling and Scaling
2404.02340
0
0
Abstract
Recent trends in natural language processing research and annotation tasks affirm a paradigm shift from the traditional reliance on a single ground truth to a focus on individual perspectives, particularly in subjective tasks. In scenarios where annotation tasks are meant to encompass diversity, models that solely rely on the majority class labels may inadvertently disregard valuable minority perspectives. This oversight could result in the omission of crucial information and, in a broader context, risk disrupting the balance within larger ecosystems. As the landscape of annotator modeling unfolds with diverse representation techniques, it becomes imperative to investigate their effectiveness with the fine-grained features of the datasets in view. This study systematically explores various annotator modeling techniques and compares their performance across seven corpora. From our findings, we show that the commonly used user token model consistently outperforms more complex models. We introduce a composite embedding approach and show distinct differences in which model performs best as a function of the agreement with a given dataset. Our findings shed light on the relationship between corpus statistics and annotator modeling performance, which informs future work on corpus construction and perspectivist NLP.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper discusses considerations for building annotator models and scaling annotation efforts effectively.
- It examines how the characteristics of the dataset and annotator pool can impact the performance and scalability of annotator models.
- The research aims to provide guidance on corpus design and annotator selection to improve the quality and efficiency of annotation tasks.
Plain English Explanation
Building high-quality datasets for training machine learning models often requires extensive human annotation. However, managing and scaling these annotation efforts can be challenging. The researchers in this paper explore how the properties of the corpus and the annotators themselves can influence the effectiveness of models that aim to predict annotator behavior and quality.
Imagine you're trying to build a system that can automatically assess the reliability of different people doing labeling work for a dataset. The paper looks at factors like the diversity of the dataset, the expertise of the annotators, and how they interact - and how these factors impact the performance and scalability of the annotator modeling approach.
The key idea is that by carefully designing the dataset and thoughtfully selecting the right annotators, you can build more robust and generalizable models for predicting annotation quality. This can lead to more efficient and cost-effective data labeling pipelines that produce higher-quality training data for machine learning.
Technical Explanation
The paper first reviews prior work on annotator modeling, which aims to capture annotator characteristics like expertise, bias, and consistency. It then discusses how the corpus itself - the dataset being annotated - and the pool of annotators can influence the effectiveness of these models.
On the corpus side, factors like the diversity of the data samples and the complexity of the annotation task are examined. The researchers find that more diverse and challenging datasets can make it harder to build reliable annotator models, as there is greater variability in how different annotators approach the work.
In terms of the annotator pool, properties like the size, expertise distribution, and level of agreement among annotators are shown to impact the scalability and performance of annotation modeling. For example, having a more heterogeneous group of annotators with varying skill levels can make it more difficult to generalize annotation quality prediction.
The paper presents experiments demonstrating these corpus and annotator effects on annotator modeling for several real-world datasets. The results provide guidance on how to design corpora and annotator pools to enable more robust and scalable annotation quality assurance.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful analysis of important practical considerations for deploying annotator modeling systems in real-world scenarios. By highlighting the influence of corpus and annotator characteristics, it cautions against overly simplistic assumptions about the generalizability of these models.
That said, the experiments are limited to a few specific datasets, and the analysis could be expanded to consider a wider range of corpus and annotator properties. Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore potential solutions or mitigation strategies for the identified challenges, which would be a valuable next step.
Overall, the work serves as a valuable reminder that building effective human-in-the-loop systems for dataset curation requires careful attention to the nuances of the underlying data and annotator pool. Practitioners in this area would benefit from considering these insights when designing their annotation workflows.
Conclusion
This research underscores the importance of thoughtful corpus and annotator selection when deploying annotation quality modeling systems. By understanding how dataset diversity, task complexity, and annotator pool characteristics can impact the performance and scalability of these models, researchers and practitioners can design more robust and efficient annotation pipelines. This, in turn, can lead to higher-quality training data to power the next generation of machine learning models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representation
Maja Pavlovic, Massimo Poesio
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful support tools across various natural language tasks and a range of application domains. Recent studies focus on exploring their capabilities for data annotation. This paper provides a comparative overview of twelve studies investigating the potential of LLMs in labelling data. While the models demonstrate promising cost and time-saving benefits, there exist considerable limitations, such as representativeness, bias, sensitivity to prompt variations and English language preference. Leveraging insights from these studies, our empirical analysis further examines the alignment between human and GPT-generated opinion distributions across four subjective datasets. In contrast to the studies examining representation, our methodology directly obtains the opinion distribution from GPT. Our analysis thereby supports the minority of studies that are considering diverse perspectives when evaluating data annotation tasks and highlights the need for further research in this direction.
5/3/2024
💬
AnnoLLM: Making Large Language Models to Be Better Crowdsourced Annotators
Xingwei He, Zhenghao Lin, Yeyun Gong, A-Long Jin, Hang Zhang, Chen Lin, Jian Jiao, Siu Ming Yiu, Nan Duan, Weizhu Chen
0
0
Many natural language processing (NLP) tasks rely on labeled data to train machine learning models with high performance. However, data annotation is time-consuming and expensive, especially when the task involves a large amount of data or requires specialized domains. Recently, GPT-3.5 series models have demonstrated remarkable few-shot and zero-shot ability across various NLP tasks. In this paper, we first claim that large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-3.5, can serve as an excellent crowdsourced annotator when provided with sufficient guidance and demonstrated examples. Accordingly, we propose AnnoLLM, an annotation system powered by LLMs, which adopts a two-step approach, explain-then-annotate. Concretely, we first prompt LLMs to provide explanations for why the specific ground truth answer/label was assigned for a given example. Then, we construct the few-shot chain-of-thought prompt with the self-generated explanation and employ it to annotate the unlabeled data with LLMs. Our experiment results on three tasks, including user input and keyword relevance assessment, BoolQ, and WiC, demonstrate that AnnoLLM surpasses or performs on par with crowdsourced annotators. Furthermore, we build the first conversation-based information retrieval dataset employing AnnoLLM. This dataset is designed to facilitate the development of retrieval models capable of retrieving pertinent documents for conversational text. Human evaluation has validated the dataset's high quality.
4/8/2024
🏅
Capturing Perspectives of Crowdsourced Annotators in Subjective Learning Tasks
Negar Mokhberian, Myrl G. Marmarelis, Frederic R. Hopp, Valerio Basile, Fred Morstatter, Kristina Lerman
0
0
Supervised classification heavily depends on datasets annotated by humans. However, in subjective tasks such as toxicity classification, these annotations often exhibit low agreement among raters. Annotations have commonly been aggregated by employing methods like majority voting to determine a single ground truth label. In subjective tasks, aggregating labels will result in biased labeling and, consequently, biased models that can overlook minority opinions. Previous studies have shed light on the pitfalls of label aggregation and have introduced a handful of practical approaches to tackle this issue. Recently proposed multi-annotator models, which predict labels individually per annotator, are vulnerable to under-determination for annotators with few samples. This problem is exacerbated in crowdsourced datasets. In this work, we propose textbf{Annotator Aware Representations for Texts (AART)} for subjective classification tasks. Our approach involves learning representations of annotators, allowing for exploration of annotation behaviors. We show the improvement of our method on metrics that assess the performance on capturing individual annotators' perspectives. Additionally, we demonstrate fairness metrics to evaluate our model's equability of performance for marginalized annotators compared to others.
5/17/2024
Investigating Annotator Bias in Large Language Models for Hate Speech Detection
Amit Das, Zheng Zhang, Fatemeh Jamshidi, Vinija Jain, Aman Chadha, Nilanjana Raychawdhary, Mary Sandage, Lauramarie Pope, Gerry Dozier, Cheryl Seals
0
0
Data annotation, the practice of assigning descriptive labels to raw data, is pivotal in optimizing the performance of machine learning models. However, it is a resource-intensive process susceptible to biases introduced by annotators. The emergence of sophisticated Large Language Models (LLMs), like ChatGPT presents a unique opportunity to modernize and streamline this complex procedure. While existing research extensively evaluates the efficacy of LLMs, as annotators, this paper delves into the biases present in LLMs, specifically GPT 3.5 and GPT 4o when annotating hate speech data. Our research contributes to understanding biases in four key categories: gender, race, religion, and disability. Specifically targeting highly vulnerable groups within these categories, we analyze annotator biases. Furthermore, we conduct a comprehensive examination of potential factors contributing to these biases by scrutinizing the annotated data. We introduce our custom hate speech detection dataset, HateSpeechCorpus, to conduct this research. Additionally, we perform the same experiments on the ETHOS (Mollas et al., 2022) dataset also for comparative analysis. This paper serves as a crucial resource, guiding researchers and practitioners in harnessing the potential of LLMs for dataannotation, thereby fostering advancements in this critical field. The HateSpeechCorpus dataset is available here: https://github.com/AmitDasRup123/HateSpeechCorpus
6/19/2024