Cost-Effective Proxy Reward Model Construction with On-Policy and Active Learning

Overview

• This paper proposes a cost-effective method for constructing proxy reward models using on-policy and active learning techniques.

• The goal is to create accurate proxy reward models that can be used to train reinforcement learning agents, without the need for expensive human feedback or reward labeling.

• The key ideas include using active learning to selectively query a human for reward labels, and leveraging on-policy data to efficiently learn the proxy reward model.

Plain English Explanation

The paper tackles the challenge of training reinforcement learning (RL) agents to solve complex tasks when the true reward function is unknown or difficult to specify. Instead of relying on humans to manually provide reward labels, which can be time-consuming and expensive, the authors develop a more efficient approach.

Their method uses active learning to selectively query a human for reward labels on the most informative state-action pairs. This allows the system to learn an accurate proxy reward model with fewer labeled samples. Additionally, the approach utilizes on-policy data - observations collected while the agent is actually pursuing the task - to further improve the efficiency of the proxy reward model construction.

By combining active learning and on-policy data, the authors demonstrate a cost-effective way to build proxy reward models that can then be used to train RL agents to perform the desired task. This is a valuable contribution, as it can significantly reduce the resources required to deploy RL systems in the real world.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a framework for constructive proxy reward model learning, which aims to build an accurate proxy reward model without requiring extensive human feedback or reward labeling.

The key technical components are:

1. Active Learning: The system selectively queries a human for reward labels on the most informative state-action pairs, using an active learning strategy to minimize the number of required labels.

2. On-Policy Data: In addition to the actively labeled samples, the system leverages on-policy data - observations collected while the agent is actually pursuing the task - to further improve the efficiency of the proxy reward model construction.

3. Proxy Reward Model Learning: The authors use a Bayesian optimization approach to learn the proxy reward model, which allows for efficient exploration of the reward function space.

The paper evaluates the proposed framework on several benchmark environments, demonstrating that it can learn accurate proxy reward models with significantly fewer human-provided labels compared to standard supervised learning approaches. This highlights the value of the active learning and on-policy data components in reducing the cost of reward model construction.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to constructing proxy reward models in a cost-effective manner. The key strengths of the work include:

• Efficient Reward Model Learning: By combining active learning and on-policy data, the authors show they can learn accurate proxy reward models with fewer human-provided labels, which is a significant practical advantage.
• Formal Optimization Framework: The Bayesian optimization approach provides a principled way to explore the reward function space and learn the proxy model.
• Thorough Experimental Evaluation: The authors evaluate their method across multiple benchmark environments, demonstrating its effectiveness.

However, the paper also has some limitations:

• Reliance on a Simulator: The experiments are conducted in simulated environments, and the performance in real-world settings may differ.
• Potential Human Bias: The proxy reward model is ultimately dependent on the human-provided labels, which could be subject to biases or inconsistencies.
• Scalability Concerns: The active learning approach may not scale well to extremely large state-action spaces, as querying the human for labels can become prohibitively expensive.

Overall, the paper presents a promising direction for reducing the cost of reward model construction in reinforcement learning. Future research could explore ways to address the identified limitations, such as investigating methods to mitigate human bias or enhance the scalability of the active learning approach.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a cost-effective framework for constructing proxy reward models using active learning and on-policy data. By selectively querying a human for reward labels on the most informative samples and leveraging on-policy observations, the authors demonstrate they can learn accurate proxy reward models with significantly fewer human-provided labels compared to standard supervised learning approaches.

This work contributes to the broader challenge of reducing the cost and effort required to deploy reinforcement learning systems in the real world, where the true reward function is often unknown or difficult to specify. The proposed techniques can enable more efficient development of RL agents for a wide range of applications, from robotics to game-playing and beyond.