Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models
2402.08114
0
0
Abstract
As large language models (LLMs) become more capable, fine-tuning techniques for aligning with human intent are increasingly important. A key consideration for aligning these models is how to most effectively use human resources, or model resources in the case where LLMs themselves are used as oracles. Reinforcement learning from Human or AI preferences (RLHF/RLAIF) is the most prominent example of such a technique, but is complex and often unstable. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently been proposed as a simpler and more stable alternative. In this work, we develop an active learning strategy for DPO to make better use of preference labels. We propose a practical acquisition function for prompt/completion pairs based on the predictive entropy of the language model and a measure of certainty of the implicit preference model optimized by DPO. We demonstrate how our approach improves both the rate of learning and final performance of fine-tuning on pairwise preference data.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a method called Active Preference Learning (APL) for training large language models (LLMs) to optimize for user preferences.
- APL aims to be a more sample-efficient approach to Reward Modeling, which is a key component of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF).
- The paper presents experimental results showing that APL can outperform standard preference optimization methods on several tasks.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are powerful tools that can generate human-like text. However, these models are often trained on broad, general data, which means they may not align with the specific preferences of individual users. Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models explores a method called Active Preference Learning (APL) to address this challenge.
The key idea behind APL is to actively elicit feedback from users to learn their preferences, rather than just relying on a fixed set of training data. This allows the model to adapt and optimize its outputs to better match what each individual user wants. The paper shows that APL can be more sample-efficient than traditional preference optimization methods, meaning it can achieve good performance with fewer user interactions.
For example, imagine you're training an AI assistant to help with writing tasks. With standard methods, the assistant might be trained on a broad corpus of text, which could lead to outputs that don't quite match your personal writing style. But with APL, the assistant would actively seek feedback from you to learn your preferences - perhaps you like a more formal tone, or you prefer certain transition words. By incorporating this feedback, the assistant can tailor its outputs to better suit your needs.
The paper presents experimental results demonstrating the benefits of this approach on several tasks. The authors show that APL can outperform alternative methods, particularly when the number of user interactions is limited. This suggests APL could be a valuable tool for making LLMs more personalized and aligned with individual user preferences.
Technical Explanation
The Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models paper proposes a method for training large language models (LLMs) to optimize for user preferences in a more sample-efficient manner. This builds on the concept of Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), which is a key approach for aligning LLMs with human values.
At the core of the APL method is the idea of actively eliciting feedback from users to learn their preferences, rather than relying solely on a fixed set of training data. This is in contrast to standard Direct Preference Optimization approaches, which aim to optimize the model's outputs based on a single, static preference function.
The paper presents two key components of the APL framework:
-
Preference Model: The authors train a preference model that learns to predict a user's preferences based on their feedback. This allows the system to actively query the user and update its understanding of their preferences.
-
Active Sampling: The system uses an active sampling strategy to intelligently select which examples to present to the user for feedback. This helps focus the learning process on the most informative samples, improving sample efficiency.
The authors evaluate the APL approach on several language modeling tasks, including text generation and summarization. Their results show that APL can outperform standard preference optimization methods, particularly when the number of user interactions is limited. This suggests APL may be a valuable technique for making LLMs more personalized and aligned with individual user preferences.
Critical Analysis
The Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models paper presents a promising approach for improving the user-alignment of large language models. By actively eliciting feedback and adapting the model's preferences accordingly, the APL method aims to be more sample-efficient than traditional preference optimization techniques.
One potential limitation of the work is the reliance on a separate preference model, which may introduce additional complexity and potential sources of error. The authors acknowledge this and suggest future work exploring Mallows-DPO as a potential alternative that could integrate the preference modeling more seamlessly.
Additionally, the paper focuses on relatively narrow language modeling tasks, and it's unclear how well the APL approach would scale to more open-ended or complex interactions. Further research exploring the bootstrapping of language models with APL could help address this limitation.
Overall, the Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models paper represents an important step towards more personalized and aligned large language models. While there are some potential avenues for improvement, the core ideas and experimental results are compelling and worthy of further exploration.
Conclusion
The Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models paper presents a novel approach to training large language models that are better aligned with individual user preferences. By actively eliciting feedback and adapting the model's outputs accordingly, the APL method aims to be more sample-efficient than traditional preference optimization techniques.
The experimental results demonstrate the potential benefits of this approach, showing that APL can outperform standard methods on several language modeling tasks. This suggests that APL could be a valuable tool for making LLMs more personalized and tailored to the needs of each user.
As language models continue to play an increasingly important role in our lives, it will be crucial to ensure they are aligned with human values and preferences. The Active Preference Learning for Large Language Models paper represents an important step towards this goal, and the ideas and techniques explored in this work could have significant implications for the future development of large language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🛠️
Active Preference Optimization for Sample Efficient RLHF
Nirjhar Das, Souradip Chakraborty, Aldo Pacchiano, Sayak Ray Chowdhury
0
0
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is pivotal in aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences. Although aligned generative models have shown remarkable abilities in various tasks, their reliance on high-quality human preference data creates a costly bottleneck in the practical application of RLHF. One primary reason is that current methods rely on uniformly picking prompt-generation pairs from a dataset of prompt-generations, to collect human feedback, resulting in sub-optimal alignment under a constrained budget, which highlights the criticality of adaptive strategies in efficient alignment. Recent works [Mehta et al., 2023, Muldrew et al., 2024] have tried to address this problem by designing various heuristics based on generation uncertainty. However, either the assumptions in [Mehta et al., 2023] are restrictive, or [Muldrew et al., 2024] do not provide any rigorous theoretical guarantee. To address these, we reformulate RLHF within contextual preference bandit framework, treating prompts as contexts, and develop an active-learning algorithm, $textit{Active Preference Optimization}$ ($texttt{APO}$), which enhances model alignment by querying preference data from the most important samples, achieving superior performance for small sample budget. We analyze the theoretical performance guarantees of $texttt{APO}$ under the BTL preference model showing that the suboptimality gap of the policy learned via $texttt{APO}$ scales as $O(1/sqrt{T})$ for a budget of $T$. We also show that collecting preference data by choosing prompts randomly leads to a policy that suffers a constant sub-optimality. We perform detailed experimental evaluations on practical preference datasets to validate $texttt{APO}$'s efficacy over the existing methods, establishing it as a sample-efficient and practical solution of alignment in a cost-effective and scalable manner.
6/6/2024
Hybrid Preference Optimization: Augmenting Direct Preference Optimization with Auxiliary Objectives
Anirudhan Badrinath, Prabhat Agarwal, Jiajing Xu
0
0
For aligning large language models (LLMs), prior work has leveraged reinforcement learning via human feedback (RLHF) or variations of direct preference optimization (DPO). While DPO offers a simpler framework based on maximum likelihood estimation, it compromises on the ability to tune language models to easily maximize non-differentiable and non-binary objectives according to the LLM designer's preferences (e.g., using simpler language or minimizing specific kinds of harmful content). These may neither align with user preferences nor even be able to be captured tractably by binary preference data. To leverage the simplicity and performance of DPO with the generalizability of RL, we propose a hybrid approach between DPO and RLHF. With a simple augmentation to the implicit reward decomposition of DPO, we allow for tuning LLMs to maximize a set of arbitrary auxiliary rewards using offline RL. The proposed method, Hybrid Preference Optimization (HPO), shows the ability to effectively generalize to both user preferences and auxiliary designer objectives, while preserving alignment performance across a range of challenging benchmarks and model sizes.
5/31/2024
Direct Preference Optimization With Unobserved Preference Heterogeneity
Keertana Chidambaram, Karthik Vinay Seetharaman, Vasilis Syrgkanis
0
0
RLHF has emerged as a pivotal step in aligning language models with human objectives and values. It typically involves learning a reward model from human preference data and then using reinforcement learning to update the generative model accordingly. Conversely, Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) directly optimizes the generative model with preference data, skipping reinforcement learning. However, both RLHF and DPO assume uniform preferences, overlooking the reality of diverse human annotators. This paper presents a new method to align generative models with varied human preferences. We propose an Expectation-Maximization adaptation to DPO, generating a mixture of models based on latent preference types of the annotators. We then introduce a min-max regret ensemble learning model to produce a single generative method to minimize worst-case regret among annotator subgroups with similar latent factors. Our algorithms leverage the simplicity of DPO while accommodating diverse preferences. Experimental results validate the effectiveness of our approach in producing equitable generative policies.
5/27/2024
Mallows-DPO: Fine-Tune Your LLM with Preference Dispersions
Haoxian Chen, Hanyang Zhao, Henry Lam, David Yao, Wenpin Tang
0
0
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently emerged as a popular approach to improve reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF), leading to better techniques to fine-tune large language models (LLM). A weakness of DPO, however, lies in its lack of capability to characterize the diversity of human preferences. Inspired by Mallows' theory of preference ranking, we develop in this paper a new approach, the Mallows-DPO. A distinct feature of this approach is a dispersion index, which reflects the dispersion of human preference to prompts. We show that existing DPO models can be reduced to special cases of this dispersion index, thus unified with Mallows-DPO. More importantly, we demonstrate (empirically) how to use this dispersion index to enhance the performance of DPO in a broad array of benchmark tasks, from synthetic bandit selection to controllable generations and dialogues, while maintaining great generalization capabilities.
5/27/2024