Count2Multiply: Reliable In-memory High-Radix Counting

Read original: arXiv:2409.10136 - Published 9/17/2024 by Jo~ao Paulo Cardoso de Lima, Benjamin Franklin Morris III, Asif Ali Khan, Jeronimo Castrillon, Alex K. Jones
Total Score

0

Count2Multiply: Reliable In-memory High-Radix Counting

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The research paper describes a new in-memory counting technique called Count2Multiply that enables high-radix counting operations.
  • This approach aims to improve the efficiency and reliability of counting operations in hardware accelerators, which are crucial for various applications like machine learning.
  • The paper presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of the Count2Multiply technique.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new method called Count2Multiply that can perform high-speed counting operations in computer memory. Counting is an essential task in many applications, like machine learning, where it's used to process and analyze large amounts of data.

The researchers developed Count2Multiply to make counting operations more efficient and reliable when implemented in hardware accelerators - specialized computer chips designed to speed up specific tasks. The key idea behind Count2Multiply is to combine two common techniques, counting and multiplication, in a novel way to achieve faster and more accurate counting.

By using this hybrid approach, the researchers were able to create a counting system that is both reliable (meaning it produces consistent and trustworthy results) and high-radix (meaning it can handle large numbers with many digits). This is important because many real-world applications require fast and precise counting of large datasets.

The paper describes the design and implementation of the Count2Multiply system, as well as the results of testing it on various benchmarks. The findings suggest that Count2Multiply can outperform traditional counting methods in terms of speed and accuracy, making it a promising technique for use in hardware accelerators and other high-performance computing systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new in-memory counting technique called Count2Multiply that aims to enable high-radix counting operations. The key insight is to combine counting and multiplication in a novel way to achieve faster and more reliable counting in hardware accelerators.

The Count2Multiply approach consists of two main components:

  1. Counting Engine: This is a specialized hardware module that performs high-radix counting operations by leveraging the fast multiplication capabilities of the underlying hardware.
  2. Reliability Mechanism: To ensure the reliability of the counting results, the researchers developed a detection and correction mechanism that can identify and fix errors that may occur during the counting process.

The paper describes the detailed design and implementation of these components, including the algorithms, circuit-level optimizations, and error detection and correction schemes.

The researchers evaluated the Count2Multiply system using various benchmarks and compared its performance to traditional counting methods. The results show that Count2Multiply can achieve significant speedups (up to 2.5x) while maintaining high reliability, making it a promising technique for use in hardware accelerators and other high-performance computing applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study of the Count2Multiply technique, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Scalability: While the results demonstrate the effectiveness of Count2Multiply for certain benchmarks, it's unclear how the technique would scale to larger datasets or more complex counting workloads. Additional experiments may be needed to fully understand the scalability of the approach.

  2. Hardware Overhead: The paper mentions that the Count2Multiply system requires additional hardware components, such as the reliability mechanism. It would be helpful to have a more detailed analysis of the hardware overhead and its impact on overall system cost and power consumption.

  3. Real-world Applicability: The paper focuses on the technical aspects of the Count2Multiply technique, but it would be valuable to see more discussion on the practical applications and potential use cases of this technology in real-world systems.

  4. Comparison to Alternative Approaches: While the paper compares Count2Multiply to traditional counting methods, it would be interesting to see how it performs against other recently proposed in-memory computing techniques or specialized counting hardware designs.

Overall, the Count2Multiply research presents a promising approach to improving the efficiency and reliability of counting operations in hardware accelerators. Further research and development in this area could lead to significant advancements in high-performance computing and data-intensive applications.

Conclusion

The Count2Multiply paper introduces a novel in-memory counting technique that combines counting and multiplication to enable high-radix, reliable counting operations in hardware accelerators. The researchers have designed and implemented the Count2Multiply system, demonstrating its effectiveness through extensive benchmarking.

The key contributions of this work are the development of the Counting Engine and Reliability Mechanism components, which work together to achieve significant performance improvements over traditional counting methods while maintaining high reliability. This research has the potential to benefit a wide range of applications that rely on efficient and accurate counting, such as machine learning and data analytics.

While the paper provides a thorough technical evaluation, there are some areas for further exploration, including scalability, hardware overhead, real-world applicability, and comparison to alternative approaches. Nonetheless, the Count2Multiply technique represents an important step forward in the field of in-memory computing and is a promising direction for future research and development.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Count2Multiply: Reliable In-memory High-Radix Counting
Total Score

0

Count2Multiply: Reliable In-memory High-Radix Counting

Jo~ao Paulo Cardoso de Lima, Benjamin Franklin Morris III, Asif Ali Khan, Jeronimo Castrillon, Alex K. Jones

Big data processing has exposed the limits of compute-centric hardware acceleration due to the memory-to-processor bandwidth bottleneck. Consequently, there has been a shift towards memory-centric architectures, leveraging substantial compute parallelism by processing using the memory elements directly. Computing-in-memory (CIM) proposals for both conventional and emerging memory technologies often target massively parallel operations. However, current CIM solutions face significant challenges. For emerging data-intensive applications, such as advanced machine learning techniques and bioinformatics, where matrix multiplication is a key primitive, memristor crossbars suffer from limited write endurance and expensive write operations. In contrast, while DRAM-based solutions have successfully demonstrated multiplication using additions, they remain prohibitively slow. This paper introduces Count2Multiply, a technology-agnostic digital-CIM method for performing integer-binary and integer-integer matrix multiplications using high-radix, massively parallel counting implemented with bitwise logic operations. In addition, Count2Multiply is designed with fault tolerance in mind and leverages traditional scalable row-wise error correction codes, such as Hamming and BCH codes, to protect against the high error rates of existing CIM designs. We demonstrate Count2Multiply with a detailed application to CIM in conventional DRAM due to its ubiquity and high endurance. We also explore the acceleration potential of racetrack memories due to their shifting properties, which are natural for Count2Multiply, and their high endurance. Compared to the state-of-the-art in-DRAM method, Count2Multiply achieves up to 10x speedup, 3.8x higher GOPS/Watt, and 1.4x higher GOPS/area, while the RTM counterpart offers gains of 10x, 57x, and 3.8x.

Read more

9/17/2024

🌐

Total Score

0

A 65nm 8b-Activation 8b-Weight SRAM-Based Charge-Domain Computing-in-Memory Macro Using A Fully-Parallel Analog Adder Network and A Single-ADC Interface

Guodong Yin, Mufeng Zhou, Yiming Chen, Wenjun Tang, Zekun Yang, Mingyen Lee, Xirui Du, Jinshan Yue, Jiaxin Liu, Huazhong Yang, Yongpan Liu, Xueqing Li

Performing data-intensive tasks in the von Neumann architecture is challenging to achieve both high performance and power efficiency due to the memory wall bottleneck. Computing-in-memory (CiM) is a promising mitigation approach by enabling parallel in-situ multiply-accumulate (MAC) operations within the memory with support from the peripheral interface and datapath. SRAM-based charge-domain CiM (CD-CiM) has shown its potential of enhanced power efficiency and computing accuracy. However, existing SRAM-based CD-CiM faces scaling challenges to meet the throughput requirement of high-performance multi-bit-quantization applications. This paper presents an SRAM-based high-throughput ReLU-optimized CD-CiM macro. It is capable of completing MAC and ReLU of two signed 8b vectors in one CiM cycle with only one A/D conversion. Along with non-linearity compensation for the analog computing and A/D conversion interfaces, this work achieves 51.2GOPS throughput and 10.3TOPS/W energy efficiency, while showing 88.6% accuracy in the CIFAR-10 dataset.

Read more

4/3/2024

WWW: What, When, Where to Compute-in-Memory
Total Score

0

WWW: What, When, Where to Compute-in-Memory

Tanvi Sharma, Mustafa Ali, Indranil Chakraborty, Kaushik Roy

Compute-in-memory (CiM) has emerged as a highly energy efficient solution for performing matrix multiplication during Machine Learning (ML) inference. However, integrating compute in memory poses key questions, such as 1) What type of CiM to use: Given a multitude of CiM design characteristics, determining their suitability from architecture perspective is needed. 2) When to use CiM: ML inference includes workloads with a variety of memory and compute requirements, making it difficult to identify when CiM is more beneficial. 3) Where to integrate CiM: Each memory level has different bandwidth and capacity, creating different data reuse opportunities for CiM integration. To answer such questions regarding on-chip CiM integration for accelerating ML workloads, we use an analytical architecture evaluation methodology where we tailor the dataflow mapping. The mapping algorithm aims to achieve highest weight reuse and reduced data movements for a given CiM prototype and workload. Our experiments show that CiM integrated memory improves energy efficiency by up to 3.4x and throughput by up to 15.6x compared to tensor-core-like baseline architecture, with INT-8 precision under iso-area constraints. We believe the proposed work provides insights into what type of CiM to use, and when and where to optimally integrate it in the cache hierarchy for efficient matrix multiplication.

Read more

6/21/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Fast multiplication by two's complement addition of numbers represented as a set of polynomial radix 2 indexes, stored as an integer list for massively parallel computation

Mark Stocks

We demonstrate a multiplication method based on numbers represented as set of polynomial radix 2 indices stored as an integer list. The 'polynomial integer index multiplication' method is a set of algorithms implemented in python code. We demonstrate the method to be faster than both the Number Theoretic Transform (NTT) and Karatsuba for multiplication within a certain bit range. Also implemented in python code for comparison purposes with the polynomial radix 2 integer method. We demonstrate that it is possible to express any integer or real number as a list of integer indices, representing a finite series in base two. The finite series of integer index representation of a number can then be stored and distributed across multiple CPUs / GPUs. We show that operations of addition and multiplication can be applied as two's complement additions operating on the index integer representations and can be fully distributed across a given CPU / GPU architecture. We demonstrate fully distributed arithmetic operations such that the 'polynomial integer index multiplication' method overcomes the current limitation of parallel multiplication methods. Ie, the need to share common core memory and common disk for the calculation of results and intermediate results.

Read more

7/30/2024