Counterfactual inference for sequential experiments

Read original: arXiv:2202.06891 - Published 9/24/2024 by Raaz Dwivedi, Katherine Tian, Sabina Tomkins, Predrag Klasnja, Susan Murphy, Devavrat Shah
Total Score

0

🤯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper focuses on statistical inference for sequentially designed experiments where treatments are adapted over time.
  • The goal is to provide inference guarantees for the counterfactual mean at the smallest possible scale (for each unit and time point) with minimal assumptions on the adaptive treatment policy.
  • Without structural assumptions on the counterfactual means, this task is challenging due to more unknowns than observed data points.
  • The paper introduces a latent factor model to address this challenge, which generalizes prior models.
  • Estimation is done using a non-parametric nearest neighbors method, and the paper establishes error bounds and asymptotically valid confidence intervals.
  • The theory is illustrated through simulations and a case study involving a mobile health clinical trial.

Plain English Explanation

The paper is about analyzing the results of experiments where treatments are adjusted over time based on how participants respond. The researchers want to make reliable estimates of the expected outcomes under different treatment scenarios (counterfactual mean) for each individual participant and each time point. This is challenging because the number of possible treatment scenarios is larger than the available data.

To overcome this, the researchers introduce a latent factor model - a mathematical representation that captures underlying patterns in the data. This allows them to make more accurate estimates of the counterfactual means using a non-parametric (flexible) method called nearest neighbors.

The paper shows that as the number of participants and time points increases, the estimates become more reliable and can be used to construct confidence intervals - ranges that are likely to contain the true counterfactual means. This allows researchers to draw stronger conclusions from the experimental data.

The researchers demonstrate their approach through computer simulations and an analysis of data from a mobile health study, showcasing its practical applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper addresses the challenge of [object Object] for sequentially designed experiments where multiple units (e.g., participants) are assigned treatments over multiple time points, and the treatment policies adapt over time.

The researchers aim to provide [object Object] for the [object Object] - the expected outcome under different treatments for each unit and each time point - with minimal assumptions on the [object Object].

Without any structural assumptions on the counterfactual means, this task is [object Object] due to more unknowns than observed data points. To address this, the researchers introduce a [object Object] over the counterfactual means, which serves as a non-parametric generalization of prior models.

For [object Object], the researchers use a non-parametric method - a variant of [object Object] - and establish non-asymptotic high-probability error bounds for the counterfactual mean. Under regularity conditions, these bounds lead to [object Object] as the number of units and time points grows to infinity at suitable rates.

The researchers illustrate their theory through [object Object] and a [object Object] involving data from a mobile health clinical trial.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that the task of providing inference guarantees for the counterfactual mean at the smallest possible scale is challenging due to the more unknowns than observed data points problem. While the introduced latent factor model addresses this challenge, it relies on certain regularity conditions to ensure asymptotically valid confidence intervals.

The paper also does not provide extensive discussion on the potential limitations or caveats of the proposed approach. For example, the performance of the non-parametric nearest neighbors method may be sensitive to the choice of hyperparameters, and the impact of this on the error bounds and confidence intervals is not explored in depth.

Additionally, the paper could benefit from a more thorough examination of the practical implications and real-world applications of the developed theory, beyond the illustrative simulations and case study. Exploring how the proposed methods could be applied to a wider range of sequential experiments and their impact on decision-making would strengthen the paper's contribution.

Overall, the paper presents a novel and theoretically sound approach to addressing a challenging problem in the analysis of sequentially designed experiments. However, a more comprehensive discussion of the method's limitations and potential avenues for further research would enhance the critical evaluation of this work.

Conclusion

This paper tackles the problem of providing reliable statistical inferences for the counterfactual mean in sequentially designed experiments with adaptive treatment policies. By introducing a latent factor model and a non-parametric estimation approach, the researchers have developed a framework that can offer asymptotically valid confidence intervals for the counterfactual mean at the individual unit and time point level.

The theoretical contributions of this work, such as the non-asymptotic error bounds and the connection to prior models, demonstrate the rigor of the research. The illustration through simulations and a case study showcases the practical applicability of the proposed methods.

While the paper could benefit from a more extensive discussion of limitations and future research directions, it represents a significant step forward in the field of [object Object] for sequentially designed experiments. The insights and techniques developed in this work have the potential to improve the reliability of decision-making in a wide range of applications, from healthcare to policy interventions.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤯

Total Score

0

Counterfactual inference for sequential experiments

Raaz Dwivedi, Katherine Tian, Sabina Tomkins, Predrag Klasnja, Susan Murphy, Devavrat Shah

We consider after-study statistical inference for sequentially designed experiments wherein multiple units are assigned treatments for multiple time points using treatment policies that adapt over time. Our goal is to provide inference guarantees for the counterfactual mean at the smallest possible scale -- mean outcome under different treatments for each unit and each time -- with minimal assumptions on the adaptive treatment policy. Without any structural assumptions on the counterfactual means, this challenging task is infeasible due to more unknowns than observed data points. To make progress, we introduce a latent factor model over the counterfactual means that serves as a non-parametric generalization of the non-linear mixed effects model and the bilinear latent factor model considered in prior works. For estimation, we use a non-parametric method, namely a variant of nearest neighbors, and establish a non-asymptotic high probability error bound for the counterfactual mean for each unit and each time. Under regularity conditions, this bound leads to asymptotically valid confidence intervals for the counterfactual mean as the number of units and time points grows to $infty$ together at suitable rates. We illustrate our theory via several simulations and a case study involving data from a mobile health clinical trial HeartSteps.

Read more

9/24/2024

🗣️

Total Score

0

Counterfactual Generative Models for Time-Varying Treatments

Shenghao Wu, Wenbin Zhou, Minshuo Chen, Shixiang Zhu

Estimating the counterfactual outcome of treatment is essential for decision-making in public health and clinical science, among others. Often, treatments are administered in a sequential, time-varying manner, leading to an exponentially increased number of possible counterfactual outcomes. Furthermore, in modern applications, the outcomes are high-dimensional and conventional average treatment effect estimation fails to capture disparities in individuals. To tackle these challenges, we propose a novel conditional generative framework capable of producing counterfactual samples under time-varying treatment, without the need for explicit density estimation. Our method carefully addresses the distribution mismatch between the observed and counterfactual distributions via a loss function based on inverse probability re-weighting, and supports integration with state-of-the-art conditional generative models such as the guided diffusion and conditional variational autoencoder. We present a thorough evaluation of our method using both synthetic and real-world data. Our results demonstrate that our method is capable of generating high-quality counterfactual samples and outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines.

Read more

7/16/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Conformal Counterfactual Inference under Hidden Confounding

Zonghao Chen, Ruocheng Guo, Jean-Franc{c}ois Ton, Yang Liu

Personalized decision making requires the knowledge of potential outcomes under different treatments, and confidence intervals about the potential outcomes further enrich this decision-making process and improve its reliability in high-stakes scenarios. Predicting potential outcomes along with its uncertainty in a counterfactual world poses the foundamental challenge in causal inference. Existing methods that construct confidence intervals for counterfactuals either rely on the assumption of strong ignorability, or need access to un-identifiable lower and upper bounds that characterize the difference between observational and interventional distributions. To overcome these limitations, we first propose a novel approach wTCP-DR based on transductive weighted conformal prediction, which provides confidence intervals for counterfactual outcomes with marginal converage guarantees, even under hidden confounding. With less restrictive assumptions, our approach requires access to a fraction of interventional data (from randomized controlled trials) to account for the covariate shift from observational distributoin to interventional distribution. Theoretical results explicitly demonstrate the conditions under which our algorithm is strictly advantageous to the naive method that only uses interventional data. After ensuring valid intervals on counterfactuals, it is straightforward to construct intervals for individual treatment effects (ITEs). We demonstrate our method across synthetic and real-world data, including recommendation systems, to verify the superiority of our methods compared against state-of-the-art baselines in terms of both coverage and efficiency

Read more

5/22/2024

📈

Total Score

0

Causal modelling without counterfactuals and individualised effects

Benedikt Holtgen, Robert C. Williamson

The most common approach to causal modelling is the potential outcomes framework due to Neyman and Rubin. In this framework, outcomes of counterfactual treatments are assumed to be well-defined. This metaphysical assumption is often thought to be problematic yet indispensable. The conventional approach relies not only on counterfactuals but also on abstract notions of distributions and assumptions of independence that are not directly testable. In this paper, we construe causal inference as treatment-wise predictions for finite populations where all assumptions are testable; this means that one can not only test predictions themselves (without any fundamental problem) but also investigate sources of error when they fail. The new framework highlights the model-dependence of causal claims as well as the difference between statistical and scientific inference.

Read more

8/15/2024