Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptation

Read original: arXiv:2406.20053 - Published 7/1/2024 by Danny Halawi, Alexander Wei, Eric Wallace, Tony T. Wang, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob Steinhardt
Total Score

0

Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

• This paper examines the challenges in safeguarding large language models (LLMs) from covert malicious finetuning, where an attacker surreptitiously modifies an LLM's behavior during the finetuning process.

• The authors explore the threat model of such covert finetuning attacks, highlighting the difficulties in detecting and mitigating these stealthy modifications that can undermine the safety and reliability of LLMs.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, answer questions, and complete a variety of tasks. However, these models can be vulnerable to a type of attack called "covert malicious finetuning."

In this attack, an attacker secretly modifies the behavior of an LLM during the finetuning process, which is the process of adapting the model to a specific task or domain. The attacker's changes are designed to be hidden, so the model's owner or users may not even be aware that the model has been tampered with.

These covert modifications can cause the LLM to behave in unexpected or dangerous ways, undermining its safety and reliability. For example, the model could be made to generate harmful or biased content, or to respond to certain hidden triggers in a way that serves the attacker's goals.

Detecting and preventing these covert finetuning attacks is extremely challenging, as the attacker's changes are specifically designed to be hidden and difficult to identify. This paper explores the complexities of this threat model and the difficulties in safeguarding LLMs against such attacks.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a threat model for covert malicious finetuning attacks on large language models (LLMs). In this scenario, an attacker secretly modifies the behavior of an LLM during the finetuning process, which is the process of adapting the model to a specific task or domain.

The authors explain that the attacker's goal is to introduce subtle, hidden changes to the LLM's behavior that can undermine its safety and reliability, such as causing it to generate harmful or biased content or respond to certain triggers in a way that serves the attacker's goals. These covert modifications are designed to be difficult to detect, as the attacker aims to conceal their tampering from the model's owner or users.

The paper delves into the technical details of how such attacks could be carried out, including the potential use of backdoor techniques or data poisoning approaches. The authors also discuss the challenges in developing effective countermeasures, as the hidden nature of the attacks makes them difficult to identify and mitigate.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important concerns about the security and reliability of large language models, particularly in the context of the finetuning process. The authors' exploration of the covert malicious finetuning threat model highlights the need for robust safeguards and detection mechanisms to protect LLMs from such stealthy attacks.

However, the paper does not provide detailed solutions or specific recommendations for addressing this challenge. The authors acknowledge the difficulty in developing effective countermeasures, as the hidden nature of the attacks makes them inherently challenging to detect and mitigate.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential societal implications of successful covert finetuning attacks, such as the spread of disinformation, the erosion of public trust in AI systems, or the exploitation of vulnerable populations. Exploring these broader consequences could help drive the development of more comprehensive strategies for safeguarding LLMs.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the critical challenge of securing large language models against covert malicious finetuning attacks, where an attacker surreptitiously modifies an LLM's behavior during the finetuning process. The authors' exploration of the threat model underscores the need for the AI research community to prioritize the development of robust detection and mitigation techniques to ensure the safety and reliability of these powerful language models.

As the use of LLMs becomes more pervasive in various applications, addressing this security vulnerability is essential to maintaining public trust in AI and safeguarding against the potential misuse of these technologies. Further research and collaborative efforts between researchers, developers, and policymakers will be crucial in tackling this complex and pressing challenge.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptation
Total Score

0

Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptation

Danny Halawi, Alexander Wei, Eric Wallace, Tony T. Wang, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob Steinhardt

Black-box finetuning is an emerging interface for adapting state-of-the-art language models to user needs. However, such access may also let malicious actors undermine model safety. To demonstrate the challenge of defending finetuning interfaces, we introduce covert malicious finetuning, a method to compromise model safety via finetuning while evading detection. Our method constructs a malicious dataset where every individual datapoint appears innocuous, but finetuning on the dataset teaches the model to respond to encoded harmful requests with encoded harmful responses. Applied to GPT-4, our method produces a finetuned model that acts on harmful instructions 99% of the time and avoids detection by defense mechanisms such as dataset inspection, safety evaluations, and input/output classifiers. Our findings question whether black-box finetuning access can be secured against sophisticated adversaries.

Read more

7/1/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Mimicking User Data: On Mitigating Fine-Tuning Risks in Closed Large Language Models

Francisco Eiras, Aleksandar Petrov, Phillip H. S. Torr, M. Pawan Kumar, Adel Bibi

Fine-tuning large language models on small, high-quality datasets can enhance their performance on specific downstream tasks. Recent research shows that fine-tuning on benign, instruction-following data can inadvertently undo the safety alignment process and increase a model's propensity to comply with harmful queries. Although critical, understanding and mitigating safety risks in well-defined tasks remains distinct from the instruction-following context due to structural differences in the data. Our work addresses the gap in our understanding of these risks across diverse types of data in closed models - where providers control how user data is utilized in the fine-tuning process. We demonstrate how malicious actors can subtly manipulate the structure of almost any task-specific dataset to foster significantly more dangerous model behaviors, while maintaining an appearance of innocuity and reasonable downstream task performance. To address this issue, we propose a novel mitigation strategy that mixes in safety data which mimics the task format and prompting style of the user data, showing this is more effective than existing baselines at re-establishing safety alignment while maintaining similar task performance.

Read more

7/2/2024

💬

Total Score

0

New!Harmful Fine-tuning Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models: A Survey

Tiansheng Huang, Sihao Hu, Fatih Ilhan, Selim Furkan Tekin, Ling Liu

Recent research demonstrates that the nascent fine-tuning-as-a-service business model exposes serious safety concerns -- fine-tuning over a few harmful data uploaded by the users can compromise the safety alignment of the model. The attack, known as harmful fine-tuning, has raised a broad research interest among the community. However, as the attack is still new, textbf{we observe from our miserable submission experience that there are general misunderstandings within the research community.} We in this paper aim to clear some common concerns for the attack setting, and formally establish the research problem. Specifically, we first present the threat model of the problem, and introduce the harmful fine-tuning attack and its variants. Then we systematically survey the existing literature on attacks/defenses/mechanical analysis of the problem. Finally, we outline future research directions that might contribute to the development of the field. Additionally, we present a list of questions of interest, which might be useful to refer to when reviewers in the peer review process question the realism of the experiment/attack/defense setting. A curated list of relevant papers is maintained and made accessible at: url{https://github.com/git-disl/awesome_LLM-harmful-fine-tuning-papers.}

Read more

9/30/2024

Multitask Mayhem: Unveiling and Mitigating Safety Gaps in LLMs Fine-tuning
Total Score

0

Multitask Mayhem: Unveiling and Mitigating Safety Gaps in LLMs Fine-tuning

Essa Jan, Nouar AlDahoul, Moiz Ali, Faizan Ahmad, Fareed Zaffar, Yasir Zaki

Recent breakthroughs in Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to their adoption across a wide range of tasks, ranging from code generation to machine translation and sentiment analysis, etc. Red teaming/Safety alignment efforts show that fine-tuning models on benign (non-harmful) data could compromise safety. However, it remains unclear to what extent this phenomenon is influenced by different variables, including fine-tuning task, model calibrations, etc. This paper explores the task-wise safety degradation due to fine-tuning on downstream tasks such as summarization, code generation, translation, and classification across various calibration. Our results reveal that: 1) Fine-tuning LLMs for code generation and translation leads to the highest degradation in safety guardrails. 2) LLMs generally have weaker guardrails for translation and classification, with 73-92% of harmful prompts answered, across baseline and other calibrations, falling into one of two concern categories. 3) Current solutions, including guards and safety tuning datasets, lack cross-task robustness. To address these issues, we developed a new multitask safety dataset effectively reducing attack success rates across a range of tasks without compromising the model's overall helpfulness. Our work underscores the need for generalized alignment measures to ensure safer and more robust models.

Read more

9/25/2024