CREW: Facilitating Human-AI Teaming Research
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes CREW, a framework to facilitate research on human-AI teaming.
- CREW provides a shared research infrastructure, including datasets, evaluation protocols, and tools for studying human-AI collaboration.
- The goal is to advance the science of human-AI teaming and enable more effective and trustworthy human-AI collaboration.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a framework called CREW, which is designed to help researchers study how humans and AI systems can work together effectively. CREW: Facilitating Human-AI Teaming Research
The key idea behind CREW is to provide a common set of resources, such as datasets, evaluation methods, and software tools, that researchers can use to conduct studies on human-AI collaboration. This shared infrastructure is meant to accelerate progress in this important field by making it easier for researchers to build on each other's work.
The researchers argue that as AI systems become more advanced and ubiquitous, it will be crucial to understand how humans and AI can best work together. CREW aims to facilitate this by enabling more rigorous and comparable research on topics like how humans and AI can share tasks, communicate effectively, and build trust with each other.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the CREW: Design and Components framework, which includes several key elements:
- Datasets: CREW provides access to a variety of datasets relevant to human-AI teaming, such as logs of human-AI interactions and user evaluations of AI systems.
- Evaluation Protocols: The framework defines standard evaluation procedures for assessing the performance of human-AI teams on different tasks and scenarios.
- Software Tools: CREW includes software libraries and tools to help researchers instrument experiments, collect data, and analyze results.
- Shared Infrastructure: The framework leverages cloud-based resources to allow researchers to easily deploy and run human-AI teaming studies at scale.
By providing these common resources, the researchers aim to facilitate Human-AI Teaming Research and enable more rapid progress in understanding how to design effective and trustworthy human-AI partnerships.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges some limitations and future work for CREW. For example, the current datasets and evaluation protocols may not fully capture the complexities of real-world human-AI teaming scenarios. Additionally, the framework may need to evolve to keep pace with rapidly advancing AI capabilities.
While the CREW approach is promising, further research is needed to understand the broader societal implications of human-AI collaboration. Issues around transparency, accountability, and the equitable distribution of the benefits of these technologies will also be important to consider.
Conclusion
In summary, the CREW framework represents a valuable step forward in facilitating research on human-AI teaming. By providing a shared infrastructure for experiments and analysis, the researchers aim to accelerate progress in designing effective and trustworthy human-AI partnerships. As AI systems continue to grow in sophistication, this type of collaborative research will become increasingly crucial for ensuring that these technologies are developed and deployed in ways that benefit society as a whole.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
CREW: Facilitating Human-AI Teaming Research
Lingyu Zhang, Zhengran Ji, Boyuan Chen
With the increasing deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, the potential of humans working with AI agents has been growing at a great speed. Human-AI teaming is an important paradigm for studying various aspects when humans and AI agents work together. The unique aspect of Human-AI teaming research is the need to jointly study humans and AI agents, demanding multidisciplinary research efforts from machine learning to human-computer interaction, robotics, cognitive science, neuroscience, psychology, social science, and complex systems. However, existing platforms for Human-AI teaming research are limited, often supporting oversimplified scenarios and a single task, or specifically focusing on either human-teaming research or multi-agent AI algorithms. We introduce CREW, a platform to facilitate Human-AI teaming research and engage collaborations from multiple scientific disciplines, with a strong emphasis on human involvement. It includes pre-built tasks for cognitive studies and Human-AI teaming with expandable potentials from our modular design. Following conventional cognitive neuroscience research, CREW also supports multimodal human physiological signal recording for behavior analysis. Moreover, CREW benchmarks real-time human-guided reinforcement learning agents using state-of-the-art algorithms and well-tuned baselines. With CREW, we were able to conduct 50 human subject studies within a week to verify the effectiveness of our benchmark.
Read more8/2/2024
0
A Survey on Human-AI Teaming with Large Pre-Trained Models
Vanshika Vats, Marzia Binta Nizam, Minghao Liu, Ziyuan Wang, Richard Ho, Mohnish Sai Prasad, Vincent Titterton, Sai Venkat Malreddy, Riya Aggarwal, Yanwen Xu, Lei Ding, Jay Mehta, Nathan Grinnell, Li Liu, Sijia Zhong, Devanathan Nallur Gandamani, Xinyi Tang, Rohan Ghosalkar, Celeste Shen, Rachel Shen, Nafisa Hussain, Kesav Ravichandran, James Davis
In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI), the collaboration between human intelligence and AI systems, known as Human-AI (HAI) Teaming, has emerged as a cornerstone for advancing problem-solving and decision-making processes. The advent of Large Pre-trained Models (LPtM) has significantly transformed this landscape, offering unprecedented capabilities by leveraging vast amounts of data to understand and predict complex patterns. This paper surveys the pivotal integration of LPtMs with HAI, emphasizing how these models enhance collaborative intelligence beyond traditional approaches. It examines the potential of LPtMs in augmenting human capabilities, discussing this collaboration for AI model improvements, effective teaming, ethical considerations, and their broad applied implications in various sectors. Through this exploration, the study sheds light on the transformative impact of LPtM-enhanced HAI Teaming, providing insights for future research, policy development, and strategic implementations aimed at harnessing the full potential of this collaboration for research and societal benefit.
Read more6/28/2024
0
Designs for Enabling Collaboration in Human-Machine Teaming via Interactive and Explainable Systems
Rohan Paleja, Michael Munje, Kimberlee Chang, Reed Jensen, Matthew Gombolay
Collaborative robots and machine learning-based virtual agents are increasingly entering the human workspace with the aim of increasing productivity and enhancing safety. Despite this, we show in a ubiquitous experimental domain, Overcooked-AI, that state-of-the-art techniques for human-machine teaming (HMT), which rely on imitation or reinforcement learning, are brittle and result in a machine agent that aims to decouple the machine and human's actions to act independently rather than in a synergistic fashion. To remedy this deficiency, we develop HMT approaches that enable iterative, mixed-initiative team development allowing end-users to interactively reprogram interpretable AI teammates. Our 50-subject study provides several findings that we summarize into guidelines. While all approaches underperform a simple collaborative heuristic (a critical, negative result for learning-based methods), we find that white-box approaches supported by interactive modification can lead to significant team development, outperforming white-box approaches alone, and black-box approaches are easier to train and result in better HMT performance highlighting a tradeoff between explainability and interactivity versus ease-of-training. Together, these findings present three important directions: 1) Improving the ability to generate collaborative agents with white-box models, 2) Better learning methods to facilitate collaboration rather than individualized coordination, and 3) Mixed-initiative interfaces that enable users, who may vary in ability, to improve collaboration.
Read more6/10/2024
🤖
0
The Human Factor in AI Red Teaming: Perspectives from Social and Collaborative Computing
Alice Qian Zhang, Ryland Shaw, Jacy Reese Anthis, Ashlee Milton, Emily Tseng, Jina Suh, Lama Ahmad, Ram Shankar Siva Kumar, Julian Posada, Benjamin Shestakofsky, Sarah T. Roberts, Mary L. Gray
Rapid progress in general-purpose AI has sparked significant interest in red teaming, a practice of adversarial testing originating in military and cybersecurity applications. AI red teaming raises many questions about the human factor, such as how red teamers are selected, biases and blindspots in how tests are conducted, and harmful content's psychological effects on red teamers. A growing body of HCI and CSCW literature examines related practices-including data labeling, content moderation, and algorithmic auditing. However, few, if any have investigated red teaming itself. Future studies may explore topics ranging from fairness to mental health and other areas of potential harm. We aim to facilitate a community of researchers and practitioners who can begin to meet these challenges with creativity, innovation, and thoughtful reflection.
Read more9/12/2024