Designs for Enabling Collaboration in Human-Machine Teaming via Interactive and Explainable Systems
2406.05003
0
0
Abstract
Collaborative robots and machine learning-based virtual agents are increasingly entering the human workspace with the aim of increasing productivity and enhancing safety. Despite this, we show in a ubiquitous experimental domain, Overcooked-AI, that state-of-the-art techniques for human-machine teaming (HMT), which rely on imitation or reinforcement learning, are brittle and result in a machine agent that aims to decouple the machine and human's actions to act independently rather than in a synergistic fashion. To remedy this deficiency, we develop HMT approaches that enable iterative, mixed-initiative team development allowing end-users to interactively reprogram interpretable AI teammates. Our 50-subject study provides several findings that we summarize into guidelines. While all approaches underperform a simple collaborative heuristic (a critical, negative result for learning-based methods), we find that white-box approaches supported by interactive modification can lead to significant team development, outperforming white-box approaches alone, and black-box approaches are easier to train and result in better HMT performance highlighting a tradeoff between explainability and interactivity versus ease-of-training. Together, these findings present three important directions: 1) Improving the ability to generate collaborative agents with white-box models, 2) Better learning methods to facilitate collaboration rather than individualized coordination, and 3) Mixed-initiative interfaces that enable users, who may vary in ability, to improve collaboration.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores designs for enabling collaboration between humans and machines in teaming scenarios through the use of interactive and explainable systems.
- The research focuses on developing interfaces and methods that can improve the effectiveness of human-machine collaboration by enhancing transparency, trust, and shared understanding.
- The paper reviews relevant literature and presents several novel design approaches aimed at fostering more seamless and productive human-autonomy teaming.
Plain English Explanation
The research in this paper is about helping humans and machines work together better as a team. It looks at ways to design the interfaces and interactions between people and autonomous systems to make the collaboration more effective. The key goals are to increase transparency, build trust, and create a shared understanding between the human and machine partners.
The paper reviews previous work in this area and then proposes some new design approaches to achieve these goals. The core idea is to make the autonomous systems more "explainable" - in other words, to help the human understand how the machine is making decisions and what it is doing. This can involve things like providing explanations for the system's actions, visualizing its internal reasoning, and allowing the human to directly influence or adjust the machine's behavior.
By making the autonomous systems more transparent and interactive, the researchers aim to foster a stronger partnership between the human and machine, where they can better understand each other, trust each other, and work together towards shared objectives. This is particularly important in high-stakes or safety-critical domains where effective human-autonomy teaming is crucial.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing the relevant prior research on explainable AI interfaces for human-autonomy teaming and the role of explanations in human-AI interaction. It then presents several novel design approaches for enabling more collaborative and transparent human-machine partnerships.
One key concept is the idea of "mixed-initiative" interaction, where the human and machine can take turns leading the decision-making and problem-solving process. This allows for more seamless adaptation and adjustment as the situation evolves. The paper also explores techniques for visualizing the autonomous system's internal reasoning and decision-making, as well as methods for allowing the human to directly influence and customize the system's behavior.
Additionally, the research investigates how these design principles can be applied in specific domains, such as industrial robotics, where effective human-machine collaboration is critical. The paper presents several case studies and user studies to evaluate the proposed approaches and assess their impact on factors like trust, transparency, and overall team performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a comprehensive and thoughtful exploration of the challenges and opportunities in designing interactive and explainable human-machine teaming systems. The proposed design approaches seem well-grounded in the existing literature and could potentially lead to significant improvements in the effectiveness of human-autonomy collaboration.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors note that truly achieving "shared understanding" between humans and machines is an extremely difficult challenge, and more work is needed to understand the cognitive and social factors that influence this process. Additionally, the paper recognizes that the evaluation of these systems in real-world, high-stakes scenarios is still an open question that requires further investigation.
One potential area for further exploration is the issue of "excessive transparency" - the risk that providing too much information about the inner workings of an autonomous system could actually decrease trust and understanding, rather than enhance it. The paper does not delve deeply into this potential tradeoff, and future research may need to explore more nuanced approaches to balancing transparency and complexity.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the growing body of research on human-AI interaction and collaboration. The design concepts and insights presented here could help inform the development of more effective and trustworthy human-machine teaming systems in a wide range of applications.
Conclusion
This research paper explores novel designs for enabling more effective collaboration between humans and autonomous systems through the use of interactive and explainable interfaces. The key focus is on enhancing transparency, trust, and shared understanding between the human and machine partners, which can lead to improved team performance and more seamless human-autonomy teaming.
The paper reviews relevant prior work, presents several innovative design approaches, and evaluates their impact through case studies and user studies. While the challenges of achieving true "shared understanding" between humans and machines are acknowledged, the proposed concepts show promise in fostering more productive and collaborative human-autonomy partnerships, particularly in high-stakes domains where effective teaming is crucial.
As artificial intelligence and autonomous systems become increasingly prevalent in our lives, research like this will be essential for ensuring that these technologies are designed to work harmoniously and transparently with human users. The insights and design principles outlined in this paper could help pave the way for a future where humans and machines can collaborate in more natural, intuitive, and mutually beneficial ways.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Explainable Interface for Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Survey
Xiangqi Kong, Yang Xing, Antonios Tsourdos, Ziyue Wang, Weisi Guo, Adolfo Perrusquia, Andreas Wikander
0
0
Nowadays, large-scale foundation models are being increasingly integrated into numerous safety-critical applications, including human-autonomy teaming (HAT) within transportation, medical, and defence domains. Consequently, the inherent 'black-box' nature of these sophisticated deep neural networks heightens the significance of fostering mutual understanding and trust between humans and autonomous systems. To tackle the transparency challenges in HAT, this paper conducts a thoughtful study on the underexplored domain of Explainable Interface (EI) in HAT systems from a human-centric perspective, thereby enriching the existing body of research in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). We explore the design, development, and evaluation of EI within XAI-enhanced HAT systems. To do so, we first clarify the distinctions between these concepts: EI, explanations and model explainability, aiming to provide researchers and practitioners with a structured understanding. Second, we contribute to a novel framework for EI, addressing the unique challenges in HAT. Last, our summarized evaluation framework for ongoing EI offers a holistic perspective, encompassing model performance, human-centered factors, and group task objectives. Based on extensive surveys across XAI, HAT, psychology, and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), this review offers multiple novel insights into incorporating XAI into HAT systems and outlines future directions.
5/7/2024
New!A Survey on Human-AI Teaming with Large Pre-Trained Models
Vanshika Vats, Marzia Binta Nizam, Minghao Liu, Ziyuan Wang, Richard Ho, Mohnish Sai Prasad, Vincent Titterton, Sai Venkat Malreddy, Riya Aggarwal, Yanwen Xu, Lei Ding, Jay Mehta, Nathan Grinnell, Li Liu, Sijia Zhong, Devanathan Nallur Gandamani, Xinyi Tang, Rohan Ghosalkar, Celeste Shen, Rachel Shen, Nafisa Hussain, Kesav Ravichandran, James Davis
0
0
In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI), the collaboration between human intelligence and AI systems, known as Human-AI (HAI) Teaming, has emerged as a cornerstone for advancing problem-solving and decision-making processes. The advent of Large Pre-trained Models (LPtM) has significantly transformed this landscape, offering unprecedented capabilities by leveraging vast amounts of data to understand and predict complex patterns. This paper surveys the pivotal integration of LPtMs with HAI, emphasizing how these models enhance collaborative intelligence beyond traditional approaches. It examines the potential of LPtMs in augmenting human capabilities, discussing this collaboration for AI model improvements, effective teaming, ethical considerations, and their broad applied implications in various sectors. Through this exploration, the study sheds light on the transformative impact of LPtM-enhanced HAI Teaming, providing insights for future research, policy development, and strategic implementations aimed at harnessing the full potential of this collaboration for research and societal benefit.
6/28/2024
Explainable Human-AI Interaction: A Planning Perspective
Sarath Sreedharan, Anagha Kulkarni, Subbarao Kambhampati
0
0
From its inception, AI has had a rather ambivalent relationship with humans -- swinging between their augmentation and replacement. Now, as AI technologies enter our everyday lives at an ever increasing pace, there is a greater need for AI systems to work synergistically with humans. One critical requirement for such synergistic human-AI interaction is that the AI systems be explainable to the humans in the loop. To do this effectively, AI agents need to go beyond planning with their own models of the world, and take into account the mental model of the human in the loop. Drawing from several years of research in our lab, we will discuss how the AI agent can use these mental models to either conform to human expectations, or change those expectations through explanatory communication. While the main focus of the book is on cooperative scenarios, we will point out how the same mental models can be used for obfuscation and deception. Although the book is primarily driven by our own research in these areas, in every chapter, we will provide ample connections to relevant research from other groups.
5/28/2024
Explainable AI improves task performance in human-AI collaboration
Julian Senoner, Simon Schallmoser, Bernhard Kratzwald, Stefan Feuerriegel, Torbj{o}rn Netland
0
0
Artificial intelligence (AI) provides considerable opportunities to assist human work. However, one crucial challenge of human-AI collaboration is that many AI algorithms operate in a black-box manner where the way how the AI makes predictions remains opaque. This makes it difficult for humans to validate a prediction made by AI against their own domain knowledge. For this reason, we hypothesize that augmenting humans with explainable AI as a decision aid improves task performance in human-AI collaboration. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the effect of augmenting domain experts with explainable AI in the form of visual heatmaps. We then compare participants that were either supported by (a) black-box AI or (b) explainable AI, where the latter supports them to follow AI predictions when the AI is accurate or overrule the AI when the AI predictions are wrong. We conducted two preregistered experiments with representative, real-world visual inspection tasks from manufacturing and medicine. The first experiment was conducted with factory workers from an electronics factory, who performed $N=9,600$ assessments of whether electronic products have defects. The second experiment was conducted with radiologists, who performed $N=5,650$ assessments of chest X-ray images to identify lung lesions. The results of our experiments with domain experts performing real-world tasks show that task performance improves when participants are supported by explainable AI instead of black-box AI. For example, in the manufacturing setting, we find that augmenting participants with explainable AI (as opposed to black-box AI) leads to a five-fold decrease in the median error rate of human decisions, which gives a significant improvement in task performance.
6/13/2024