Cross-silo Federated Learning with Record-level Personalized Differential Privacy

Overview

• The paper explores a novel approach to federated learning (FL) with personalized differential privacy at the record level.
• Existing solutions typically assume a uniform privacy budget for all records, which may not be adequate to meet the varying privacy requirements of individual records.
• The proposed framework, called rPDP-FL, employs a two-stage hybrid sampling scheme to accommodate varying privacy requirements.
• A critical problem is determining the ideal per-record sampling probability given the personalized privacy budget, which is tackled using a versatile solution called Simulation-CurveFitting.

Plain English Explanation

Federated learning is a way to train machine learning models without having to share sensitive data between devices or organizations. Differential privacy is a technique used to protect the privacy of individual data records during the training process.

The paper explores a new approach that combines federated learning with personalized differential privacy. This means that each individual data record can have its own unique privacy requirements, rather than a one-size-fits-all solution.

The researchers propose a framework called rPDP-FL that uses a two-stage sampling scheme to accommodate these varying privacy needs. A key challenge is figuring out the best way to determine the sampling probability for each record based on its privacy budget. The researchers introduce a solution called Simulation-CurveFitting to solve this problem.

The goal is to provide better privacy protections for individuals while still allowing effective federated learning to take place. This could be useful in applications where data privacy is particularly important, such as healthcare or finance.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a novel framework called rPDP-FL that combines federated learning with personalized differential privacy at the record level. Existing solutions typically assume a uniform privacy budget for all records, which may not be adequate to meet each record's unique privacy requirements.

The rPDP-FL framework employs a two-stage hybrid sampling scheme. The first stage involves uniform client-level sampling, while the second stage uses non-uniform record-level sampling to accommodate varying privacy needs. A critical challenge is determining the ideal per-record sampling probability q given the personalized privacy budget ε.

To address this, the authors introduce a solution called Simulation-CurveFitting. This versatile approach allows the researchers to uncover the nonlinear correlation between q and ε, and derive an elegant mathematical model to tackle the problem.

The evaluation demonstrates that the proposed solution can provide significant performance gains over baselines that do not consider personalized privacy preservation, as seen in [related work](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/mitigating-disparate-impact-differential-privacy-federated-learning, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/differentially-private-hierarchical-federated-learning, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/qmgeo-differentially-private-federated-learning-via-stochastic).

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to enhancing federated learning with personalized differential privacy. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

• The paper focuses on the cross-silo federated learning setting, which may not capture the full complexity of real-world federated learning scenarios involving many distributed clients.
• The Simulation-CurveFitting approach, while effective, relies on extensive simulations and may not be feasible for large-scale deployments with limited computational resources.
• The paper does not explore the potential trade-offs between privacy, model accuracy, and system performance in depth, which would be important for practical applications.

Additionally, further research could investigate the impact of personalized differential privacy on model fairness and the potential for disparate treatment across different subgroups of the population. Exploring these areas could help to better understand the broader implications and limitations of the proposed approach.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework called rPDP-FL that combines federated learning with personalized differential privacy at the record level. By employing a two-stage hybrid sampling scheme and the Simulation-CurveFitting solution, the researchers demonstrate significant performance gains over baselines that do not consider personalized privacy preservation.

The proposed approach has the potential to enable more effective and privacy-preserving federated learning, particularly in domains where data privacy is of utmost concern. Further research is needed to explore the broader implications and limitations of this approach, but the work represents an important step forward in the field of privacy-preserving machine learning.