The Crowd in MOOCs: A Study of Learning Patterns at Scale

Read original: arXiv:2408.03025 - Published 8/7/2024 by Xin Zhou, Aixin Sun, Jie Zhang, Donghui Lin
Total Score

0

The Crowd in MOOCs: A Study of Learning Patterns at Scale

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates learning patterns in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) at a large scale.
  • The researchers analyze a dataset of 321,981 learners across 9 edX MOOCs to understand how students engage and learn in these online environments.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to understand how students learn and interact in online courses that can have thousands or even millions of participants. To do this, they looked at data from 9 different online courses on the edX platform, which included over 320,000 students in total.

Some of the key findings from the study:

  • Most students only briefly engage with the course content and don't complete assignments or exams. Link to related paper on student performance predictions
  • There are distinct patterns of student engagement, with some being more active throughout the course and others dropping out early on. Link to related paper on student behavior classification
  • The researchers were able to identify different "types" of learners based on their engagement and performance in the courses. Link to related paper on grading MOOCs
  • Overall, the study provides insights into the learning dynamics of these large-scale online courses and the diverse ways that students interact with the material. Link to related paper on using big data for academic performance analysis

Technical Explanation

The researchers analyzed clickstream data from 9 edX MOOCs involving 321,981 learners to investigate patterns of engagement and learning. They used clustering techniques to identify distinct groups of students based on their activity and performance within the courses.

The analysis revealed several key findings:

  • Limited Engagement: The majority of students (70%) only briefly engaged with the course content and did not complete any assignments or exams.
  • Engagement Patterns: The researchers identified five distinct patterns of student engagement, ranging from those who were highly active throughout the course to those who disengaged early on.
  • Learner Types: By combining engagement metrics and performance data, the researchers were able to define six "types" of learners, such as "Sampling Learners" who briefly explored content, and "Completing Learners" who actively participated and performed well.
  • Significance: These insights into the diverse ways students learn in large-scale online courses can inform the design of more effective MOOC experiences and interventions to support different types of learners. Link to related paper on integrating behavior analysis and machine learning for prediction

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations to their study, including the reliance on clickstream data which may not fully capture all aspects of student learning and engagement. Additionally, the study was conducted on edX courses, so the findings may not generalize to MOOCs on other platforms or in different subject areas.

While the identification of distinct learner types is a valuable contribution, the researchers do not provide a deep exploration of the underlying reasons for these differences in engagement and performance. Further qualitative research could shed light on the motivations, goals, and contextual factors that shape students' learning behaviors in MOOCs.

Additionally, the study does not address potential issues of equity and inclusion in these large-scale online courses. The researchers could have examined whether certain learner types were overrepresented by demographic characteristics or prior educational background, which could inform efforts to make MOOCs more accessible and supportive for diverse populations.

Conclusion

This study provides important insights into the complex and varied ways that students engage with and learn in Massive Open Online Courses. By identifying distinct patterns of learner engagement and performance, the researchers highlight the need for MOOC designers and educators to consider the diverse needs and behaviors of their student populations.

The findings from this work can inform the development of more personalized and adaptive learning experiences in MOOCs, as well as interventions to support students who may be at risk of disengaging or underperforming. As online education continues to grow in scale and importance, research like this will be crucial for ensuring these learning environments are effective and equitable for all students.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

The Crowd in MOOCs: A Study of Learning Patterns at Scale
Total Score

0

The Crowd in MOOCs: A Study of Learning Patterns at Scale

Xin Zhou, Aixin Sun, Jie Zhang, Donghui Lin

The increasing availability of learning activity data in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) enables us to conduct a large-scale analysis of learners' learning behavior. In this paper, we analyze a dataset of 351 million learning activities from 0.8 million unique learners enrolled in over 1.6 thousand courses within two years. Specifically, we mine and identify the learning patterns of the crowd from both temporal and course enrollment perspectives leveraging mutual information theory and sequential pattern mining methods. From the temporal perspective, we find that the time intervals between consecutive learning activities of learners exhibit a mix of power-law and periodic cosine function distribution. By qualifying the relationship between course pairs, we observe that the most frequently co-enrolled courses usually fall in the same category or the same university. We demonstrate these findings can facilitate manifold applications including recommendation tasks on courses. A simple recommendation model utilizing the course enrollment patterns is competitive to the baselines with 200$times$ faster training time.

Read more

8/7/2024

🏷️

Total Score

0

Ordinal Behavior Classification of Student Online Course Interactions

Thomas Trask

The study in interaction patterns between students in on-campus and MOOC-style online courses has been broadly studied for the last 11 years. Yet there remains a gap in the literature comparing the habits of students completing the same course offered in both on-campus and MOOC-style online formats. This study will look at browser-based usage patterns for students in the Georgia Tech CS1301 edx course for both the online course offered to on-campus students and the MOOCstyle course offered to anyone to determine what, if any, patterns exist between the two cohorts.

Read more

5/9/2024

A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance Predictions in Online Courses using Heterogeneous Knowledge Graphs
Total Score

0

A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance Predictions in Online Courses using Heterogeneous Knowledge Graphs

Thomas Trask, Dr. Nicholas Lytle, Michael Boyle, Dr. David Joyner, Dr. Ahmed Mubarak

As online courses become the norm in the higher-education landscape, investigations into student performance between students who take online vs on-campus versions of classes become necessary. While attention has been given to looking at differences in learning outcomes through comparisons of students' end performance, less attention has been given in comparing students' engagement patterns between different modalities. In this study, we analyze a heterogeneous knowledge graph consisting of students, course videos, formative assessments and their interactions to predict student performance via a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN). Using students' performance on the assessments, we attempt to determine a useful model for identifying at-risk students. We then compare the models generated between 5 on-campus and 2 fully-online MOOC-style instances of the same course. The model developed achieved a 70-90% accuracy of predicting whether a student would pass a particular problem set based on content consumed, course instance, and modality.

Read more

7/18/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Grading Massive Open Online Courses Using Large Language Models

Shahriar Golchin, Nikhil Garuda, Christopher Impey, Matthew Wenger

Massive open online courses (MOOCs) offer free education globally to anyone with a computer and internet access. Despite this democratization of learning, the massive enrollment in these courses makes it impractical for one instructor to assess every student's writing assignment. As a result, peer grading, often guided by a straightforward rubric, is the method of choice. While convenient, peer grading often falls short in terms of reliability and validity. In this study, we explore the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) to replace peer grading in MOOCs. Specifically, we use two LLMs, GPT-4 and GPT-3.5, across three MOOCs: Introductory Astronomy, Astrobiology, and the History and Philosophy of Astronomy. To instruct LLMs, we use three different prompts based on the zero-shot chain-of-thought (ZCoT) prompting technique: (1) ZCoT with instructor-provided correct answers, (2) ZCoT with both instructor-provided correct answers and rubrics, and (3) ZCoT with instructor-provided correct answers and LLM-generated rubrics. Tested on 18 settings, our results show that ZCoT, when augmented with instructor-provided correct answers and rubrics, produces grades that are more aligned with those assigned by instructors compared to peer grading. Finally, our findings indicate a promising potential for automated grading systems in MOOCs, especially in subjects with well-defined rubrics, to improve the learning experience for millions of online learners worldwide.

Read more

6/18/2024