Ordinal Behavior Classification of Student Online Course Interactions

Read original: arXiv:2405.05142 - Published 5/9/2024 by Thomas Trask
Total Score

0

🏷️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The study examines the interaction patterns of students in on-campus and MOOC-style online courses.
  • Researchers aim to compare the browsing behaviors of students taking the same course in both formats.
  • The study focuses on the Georgia Tech CS1301 edx course, analyzing usage data from the on-campus and MOOC-style online versions.

Plain English Explanation

This research project looks at how students interact and behave differently when taking the same course in two different formats: an on-campus class and an online MOOC (Massive Open Online Course)-style course. The researchers are particularly interested in comparing the browsing and usage patterns of students in these two course settings.

To do this, they examined data from the Georgia Tech CS1301 edx course, which is offered both to on-campus students and as an open online course that anyone can take. By analyzing how students interact with the course materials and engage with the content in these two different environments, the researchers hope to uncover any similarities or differences in student behavior and learning habits.

Technical Explanation

The study focuses on analyzing the browser-based usage patterns of students enrolled in the Georgia Tech CS1301 edx course, which is offered in both an on-campus format and a MOOC-style online format. The researchers aim to identify any patterns that may exist between the two student cohorts taking the same course content in these different settings.

By examining the browsing and engagement data of students in both the on-campus and online versions of the course, the researchers hope to gain insights into how the learning experience and student behaviors may differ between these two course delivery modes. This could help inform the design and implementation of effective online learning environments and improve the quality of computer science education delivered through both traditional and distance learning formats.

Critical Analysis

The research presented in this study is valuable in contributing to the ongoing exploration of student engagement and behavior in immersive learning environments, particularly as education continues to evolve and incorporate more online and technology-mediated components.

However, the study does not provide details on the specific metrics or methods used to analyze the student usage data, which could limit the ability to fully evaluate the rigor and validity of the findings. Additionally, the study is focused on a single course at a single institution, which may limit the generalizability of the results to other educational contexts.

Further research could expand the analysis to include a wider range of courses, institutions, and student populations to better understand the broader applicability of the findings. Incorporating qualitative data, such as student interviews or surveys, could also provide deeper insights into the factors influencing the observed differences in student behaviors between the on-campus and online course formats.

Conclusion

This study represents an important step in understanding the interaction patterns and browsing behaviors of students enrolled in both on-campus and MOOC-style online courses. By focusing on the Georgia Tech CS1301 edx course, the researchers aim to uncover any notable differences in how students engage with the same course content in these two distinct learning environments.

The findings from this research could have significant implications for the design and implementation of effective online learning systems and the ongoing efforts to improve the quality and accessibility of computer science education. However, further research is needed to validate the findings and explore their broader applicability across a wider range of educational contexts.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🏷️

Total Score

0

Ordinal Behavior Classification of Student Online Course Interactions

Thomas Trask

The study in interaction patterns between students in on-campus and MOOC-style online courses has been broadly studied for the last 11 years. Yet there remains a gap in the literature comparing the habits of students completing the same course offered in both on-campus and MOOC-style online formats. This study will look at browser-based usage patterns for students in the Georgia Tech CS1301 edx course for both the online course offered to on-campus students and the MOOCstyle course offered to anyone to determine what, if any, patterns exist between the two cohorts.

Read more

5/9/2024

The Crowd in MOOCs: A Study of Learning Patterns at Scale
Total Score

0

The Crowd in MOOCs: A Study of Learning Patterns at Scale

Xin Zhou, Aixin Sun, Jie Zhang, Donghui Lin

The increasing availability of learning activity data in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) enables us to conduct a large-scale analysis of learners' learning behavior. In this paper, we analyze a dataset of 351 million learning activities from 0.8 million unique learners enrolled in over 1.6 thousand courses within two years. Specifically, we mine and identify the learning patterns of the crowd from both temporal and course enrollment perspectives leveraging mutual information theory and sequential pattern mining methods. From the temporal perspective, we find that the time intervals between consecutive learning activities of learners exhibit a mix of power-law and periodic cosine function distribution. By qualifying the relationship between course pairs, we observe that the most frequently co-enrolled courses usually fall in the same category or the same university. We demonstrate these findings can facilitate manifold applications including recommendation tasks on courses. A simple recommendation model utilizing the course enrollment patterns is competitive to the baselines with 200$times$ faster training time.

Read more

8/7/2024

A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance Predictions in Online Courses using Heterogeneous Knowledge Graphs
Total Score

0

A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance Predictions in Online Courses using Heterogeneous Knowledge Graphs

Thomas Trask, Dr. Nicholas Lytle, Michael Boyle, Dr. David Joyner, Dr. Ahmed Mubarak

As online courses become the norm in the higher-education landscape, investigations into student performance between students who take online vs on-campus versions of classes become necessary. While attention has been given to looking at differences in learning outcomes through comparisons of students' end performance, less attention has been given in comparing students' engagement patterns between different modalities. In this study, we analyze a heterogeneous knowledge graph consisting of students, course videos, formative assessments and their interactions to predict student performance via a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN). Using students' performance on the assessments, we attempt to determine a useful model for identifying at-risk students. We then compare the models generated between 5 on-campus and 2 fully-online MOOC-style instances of the same course. The model developed achieved a 70-90% accuracy of predicting whether a student would pass a particular problem set based on content consumed, course instance, and modality.

Read more

7/18/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

Gender Differences in Class Participation in Online versus In-Person Core CS Courses

Madison Brigham, Joel Porquet-Lupine

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly altered how post-secondary students receive their education. Namely, the transition from an in-person to an online class format changed how students interact with their instructors and their classmates. In this paper, we use student participation scores from two core computer science classes across ten in-person and three online quarters at a public research university to analyze whether the shift to primarily asynchronous online learning has impacted the gender gap in student participation scores and students' attitudes towards themselves and their peers. We observe a shift on the online class forum: in in-person classes, males score higher on average and dominate the top scores while in online classes, male and female students participate at approximately the same rate classwide. To understand what might be driving changes in participation behavior, we analyze survey responses from over a quarter of the students enrolled in the online classes. While we find that students of both genders tend to compare themselves to their peers less when classes are online, we also find that this trend is much more accentuated for females than males. This data suggests that observed female participation habits in typical in-person classes are not inherent gender differences, but rather, a product of the environment. Therefore, it is critical the community investigates the root causes of these behavioral differences, and experiments with ways to mitigate them, before we soon return to an in-person format.

Read more

6/19/2024