DARA: Decomposition-Alignment-Reasoning Autonomous Language Agent for Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces DARA, a novel Decomposition-Alignment-Reasoning Autonomous Language Agent for Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs.
- DARA combines language understanding, knowledge retrieval, and reasoning to answer complex questions by breaking them down, aligning relevant information, and performing multi-step inference.
- The approach aims to bridge the gap between language-based reasoning and knowledge-based reasoning, enabling more flexible and explainable question answering.
Plain English Explanation
DARA is a system that can answer questions by breaking them down, finding relevant information, and then reasoning about the answer. It combines natural language understanding, knowledge retrieval, and multi-step reasoning to tackle complex questions.
The key idea is that DARA can decompose a question into simpler parts, align the relevant information from a knowledge graph, and then reason over this information to arrive at the final answer. This allows it to handle more complex queries than a typical question answering system.
For example, if asked "What is the capital of the country where the tallest mountain in Europe is located?", DARA would:
- Identify the relevant parts of the question (capital, country, tallest mountain in Europe)
- Find information about the tallest mountain in Europe and the country it is located in
- Use this to determine the capital of that country
By breaking down the question and reasoning over the relevant facts, DARA can provide a more explainable answer than a system that simply looks up a single fact.
Technical Explanation
The DARA architecture consists of three key components:
-
Decomposition: DARA first breaks down the input question into simpler sub-questions or modules that can be more easily answered.
-
Alignment: DARA then retrieves relevant information from a knowledge graph by aligning the sub-questions to the graph structure.
-
Reasoning: Finally, DARA performs multi-step reasoning over the retrieved information to generate the final answer.
The key innovation of DARA is its ability to decompose complex questions, align the relevant facts, and then reason over them in a structured way. This allows it to handle more complex queries than traditional question answering systems, which often rely on simple lookup or pattern matching.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge that DARA's performance is dependent on the quality and coverage of the underlying knowledge graph. If relevant facts are missing or incomplete, the system's reasoning will be limited. Additionally, the decomposition and alignment steps introduce potential sources of error that could lead to incorrect answers.
Another potential issue is the interpretability and explainability of DARA's reasoning process. While the authors claim that DARA provides more explainable answers, the details of the reasoning may still be opaque to users. Further work may be needed to improve the transparency of the system's decision-making.
Finally, the paper does not extensively compare DARA to other state-of-the-art question answering systems, making it difficult to assess its relative performance. Expanding the experimental evaluation could help better understand DARA's strengths and weaknesses compared to other approaches.
Conclusion
The DARA system represents an interesting step towards more flexible and explainable question answering over knowledge graphs. By combining language understanding, knowledge retrieval, and multi-step reasoning, it can handle more complex queries than traditional systems.
While the paper identifies several promising directions, further research is needed to address the system's potential limitations, such as its reliance on complete knowledge graphs and the need for improved transparency in its reasoning process. As the field of question answering continues to evolve, approaches like DARA that bridge the gap between language and knowledge-based reasoning may play an increasingly important role.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
DARA: Decomposition-Alignment-Reasoning Autonomous Language Agent for Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs
Haishuo Fang, Xiaodan Zhu, Iryna Gurevych
Answering Questions over Knowledge Graphs (KGQA) is key to well-functioning autonomous language agents in various real-life applications. To improve the neural-symbolic reasoning capabilities of language agents powered by Large Language Models (LLMs) in KGQA, we propose the DecompositionAlignment-Reasoning Agent (DARA) framework. DARA effectively parses questions into formal queries through a dual mechanism: high-level iterative task decomposition and low-level task grounding. Importantly, DARA can be efficiently trained with a small number of high-quality reasoning trajectories. Our experimental results demonstrate that DARA fine-tuned on LLMs (e.g. Llama-2-7B, Mistral) outperforms both in-context learning-based agents with GPT-4 and alternative fine-tuned agents, across different benchmarks in zero-shot evaluation, making such models more accessible for real-life applications. We also show that DARA attains performance comparable to state-of-the-art enumerating-and-ranking-based methods for KGQA.
Read more6/12/2024
🧠
0
DARA: Domain- and Relation-aware Adapters Make Parameter-efficient Tuning for Visual Grounding
Ting Liu, Xuyang Liu, Siteng Huang, Honggang Chen, Quanjun Yin, Long Qin, Donglin Wang, Yue Hu
Visual grounding (VG) is a challenging task to localize an object in an image based on a textual description. Recent surge in the scale of VG models has substantially improved performance, but also introduced a significant burden on computational costs during fine-tuning. In this paper, we explore applying parameter-efficient transfer learning (PETL) to efficiently transfer the pre-trained vision-language knowledge to VG. Specifically, we propose textbf{DARA}, a novel PETL method comprising underline{textbf{D}}omain-aware underline{textbf{A}}dapters (DA Adapters) and underline{textbf{R}}elation-aware underline{textbf{A}}dapters (RA Adapters) for VG. DA Adapters first transfer intra-modality representations to be more fine-grained for the VG domain. Then RA Adapters share weights to bridge the relation between two modalities, improving spatial reasoning. Empirical results on widely-used benchmarks demonstrate that DARA achieves the best accuracy while saving numerous updated parameters compared to the full fine-tuning and other PETL methods. Notably, with only textbf{2.13%} tunable backbone parameters, DARA improves average accuracy by textbf{0.81%} across the three benchmarks compared to the baseline model. Our code is available at url{https://github.com/liuting20/DARA}.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Debate on Graph: a Flexible and Reliable Reasoning Framework for Large Language Models
Jie Ma, Zhitao Gao, Qi Chai, Wangchun Sun, Pinghui Wang, Hongbin Pei, Jing Tao, Lingyun Song, Jun Liu, Chen Zhang, Lizhen Cui
Large Language Models (LLMs) may suffer from hallucinations in real-world applications due to the lack of relevant knowledge. In contrast, knowledge graphs encompass extensive, multi-relational structures that store a vast array of symbolic facts. Consequently, integrating LLMs with knowledge graphs has been extensively explored, with Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA) serving as a critical touchstone for the integration. This task requires LLMs to answer natural language questions by retrieving relevant triples from knowledge graphs. However, existing methods face two significant challenges: textit{excessively long reasoning paths distracting from the answer generation}, and textit{false-positive relations hindering the path refinement}. In this paper, we propose an iterative interactive KGQA framework that leverages the interactive learning capabilities of LLMs to perform reasoning and Debating over Graphs (DoG). Specifically, DoG employs a subgraph-focusing mechanism, allowing LLMs to perform answer trying after each reasoning step, thereby mitigating the impact of lengthy reasoning paths. On the other hand, DoG utilizes a multi-role debate team to gradually simplify complex questions, reducing the influence of false-positive relations. This debate mechanism ensures the reliability of the reasoning process. Experimental results on five public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our architecture. Notably, DoG outperforms the state-of-the-art method ToG by 23.7% and 9.1% in accuracy on WebQuestions and GrailQA, respectively. Furthermore, the integration experiments with various LLMs on the mentioned datasets highlight the flexibility of DoG. Code is available at url{https://github.com/reml-group/DoG}.
Read more9/6/2024
0
GNN-RAG: Graph Neural Retrieval for Large Language Model Reasoning
Costas Mavromatis, George Karypis
Knowledge Graphs (KGs) represent human-crafted factual knowledge in the form of triplets (head, relation, tail), which collectively form a graph. Question Answering over KGs (KGQA) is the task of answering natural questions grounding the reasoning to the information provided by the KG. Large Language Models (LLMs) are the state-of-the-art models for QA tasks due to their remarkable ability to understand natural language. On the other hand, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used for KGQA as they can handle the complex graph information stored in the KG. In this work, we introduce GNN-RAG, a novel method for combining language understanding abilities of LLMs with the reasoning abilities of GNNs in a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) style. First, a GNN reasons over a dense KG subgraph to retrieve answer candidates for a given question. Second, the shortest paths in the KG that connect question entities and answer candidates are extracted to represent KG reasoning paths. The extracted paths are verbalized and given as input for LLM reasoning with RAG. In our GNN-RAG framework, the GNN acts as a dense subgraph reasoner to extract useful graph information, while the LLM leverages its natural language processing ability for ultimate KGQA. Furthermore, we develop a retrieval augmentation (RA) technique to further boost KGQA performance with GNN-RAG. Experimental results show that GNN-RAG achieves state-of-the-art performance in two widely used KGQA benchmarks (WebQSP and CWQ), outperforming or matching GPT-4 performance with a 7B tuned LLM. In addition, GNN-RAG excels on multi-hop and multi-entity questions outperforming competing approaches by 8.9--15.5% points at answer F1.
Read more5/31/2024