Data Debiasing with Datamodels (D3M): Improving Subgroup Robustness via Data Selection
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a novel data debiasing technique called Data Debiasing with Datamodels (D3M) to improve the subgroup robustness of machine learning models.
- D3M aims to address issues of bias and unfairness in model performance across different subgroups.
- Proposes a data selection approach that leverages datamodels to identify and mitigate biases in the training data.
Plain English Explanation
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/debiasing-algorithm-through-model-adaptation">Data Debiasing with Datamodels (D3M)</a> is a technique designed to improve the fairness and robustness of machine learning models. Many AI systems can perform well on average but struggle with certain subgroups of the population, exhibiting biases and unfairness.
The researchers behind D3M recognized this problem and developed a new approach to address it. The key idea is to use "datamodels" - statistical models that describe the underlying data - to identify and mitigate biases in the training data. By carefully selecting which data to use for training, the researchers aim to create machine learning models that are more equitable and perform well across diverse subgroups.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/contrastive-learning-approach-to-mitigate-bias-speech">This is an important advancement</a>, as biases in AI systems can have real-world consequences, leading to unfair outcomes for certain individuals or communities. D3M provides a principled way to build fairer and more robust machine learning models, which could lead to more trustworthy and inclusive AI applications.
Technical Explanation
The main contribution of this work is the Data Debiasing with Datamodels (D3M) framework, which leverages datamodels to identify and mitigate biases in the training data for machine learning models.
The D3M approach involves the following steps:
-
Datamodel Learning: The researchers learn a set of datamodels that capture the statistical properties of the training data, including any potential biases or imbalances.
-
Data Selection: Based on the learned datamodels, D3M selects a subset of the training data that is more representative and balanced across different subgroups.
-
Model Training: The machine learning model is then trained on the selected, debiased dataset, resulting in improved performance and fairness across subgroups.
The key innovation in D3M is the use of datamodels to guide the data selection process. By understanding the underlying data distribution and any biases present, the researchers can make more informed decisions about which data to include or exclude during training.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/trusting-fair-data-leveraging-quality-fairness-driven">This approach builds on prior work in debiasing and fair machine learning</a>, but offers a novel perspective by focusing on the data itself rather than just the model architecture or optimization process.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work:
- The effectiveness of D3M may depend on the quality and appropriateness of the datamodels used, which could be challenging to develop for complex, high-dimensional datasets.
- The data selection process may introduce its own biases if not carefully designed, potentially leading to unintended consequences.
- The computational overhead of learning datamodels and performing data selection may be non-trivial, especially for large-scale datasets.
<a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/de-biasing-models-biased-decisions-comparison-methods">Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive comparison to other debiasing techniques</a>, making it difficult to assess the relative merits of the D3M approach.
Overall, the D3M framework is a promising approach to improving the fairness and robustness of machine learning models, but further research is needed to address the identified limitations and thoroughly evaluate its performance compared to alternative methods.
Conclusion
The <a href="https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/bias-amplification-enhances-minority-group-performance">Data Debiasing with Datamodels (D3M) technique</a> introduced in this paper represents an important step forward in addressing issues of bias and unfairness in machine learning. By leveraging datamodels to guide the data selection process, D3M offers a principled way to build more equitable and robust AI systems.
While the approach has some limitations that require further exploration, the potential benefits of improved subgroup performance and fairer outcomes make D3M a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to develop trustworthy and inclusive artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Data Debiasing with Datamodels (D3M): Improving Subgroup Robustness via Data Selection
Saachi Jain, Kimia Hamidieh, Kristian Georgiev, Andrew Ilyas, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Aleksander Madry
Machine learning models can fail on subgroups that are underrepresented during training. While techniques such as dataset balancing can improve performance on underperforming groups, they require access to training group annotations and can end up removing large portions of the dataset. In this paper, we introduce Data Debiasing with Datamodels (D3M), a debiasing approach which isolates and removes specific training examples that drive the model's failures on minority groups. Our approach enables us to efficiently train debiased classifiers while removing only a small number of examples, and does not require training group annotations or additional hyperparameter tuning.
Read more6/26/2024
🔍
0
Debiasing Algorithm through Model Adaptation
Tomasz Limisiewicz, David Marev{c}ek, Tom'av{s} Musil
Large language models are becoming the go-to solution for the ever-growing number of tasks. However, with growing capacity, models are prone to rely on spurious correlations stemming from biases and stereotypes present in the training data. This work proposes a novel method for detecting and mitigating gender bias in language models. We perform causal analysis to identify problematic model components and discover that mid-upper feed-forward layers are most prone to convey bias. Based on the analysis results, we intervene in the model by applying a linear projection to the weight matrices of these layers. Our titular method, DAMA, significantly decreases bias as measured by diverse metrics while maintaining the model's performance on downstream tasks. We release code for our method and models, which retrain LLaMA's state-of-the-art performance while being significantly less biased.
Read more5/30/2024
0
Model Debiasing by Learnable Data Augmentation
Pietro Morerio, Ruggero Ragonesi, Vittorio Murino
Deep Neural Networks are well known for efficiently fitting training data, yet experiencing poor generalization capabilities whenever some kind of bias dominates over the actual task labels, resulting in models learning shortcuts. In essence, such models are often prone to learn spurious correlations between data and labels. In this work, we tackle the problem of learning from biased data in the very realistic unsupervised scenario, i.e., when the bias is unknown. This is a much harder task as compared to the supervised case, where auxiliary, bias-related annotations, can be exploited in the learning process. This paper proposes a novel 2-stage learning pipeline featuring a data augmentation strategy able to regularize the training. First, biased/unbiased samples are identified by training over-biased models. Second, such subdivision (typically noisy) is exploited within a data augmentation framework, properly combining the original samples while learning mixing parameters, which has a regularization effect. Experiments on synthetic and realistic biased datasets show state-of-the-art classification accuracy, outperforming competing methods, ultimately proving robust performance on both biased and unbiased examples. Notably, being our training method totally agnostic to the level of bias, it also positively affects performance for any, even apparently unbiased, dataset, thus improving the model generalization regardless of the level of bias (or its absence) in the data.
Read more8/12/2024
0
A Contrastive Learning Approach to Mitigate Bias in Speech Models
Alkis Koudounas, Flavio Giobergia, Eliana Pastor, Elena Baralis
Speech models may be affected by performance imbalance in different population subgroups, raising concerns about fair treatment across these groups. Prior attempts to mitigate unfairness either focus on user-defined subgroups, potentially overlooking other affected subgroups, or do not explicitly improve the internal representation at the subgroup level. This paper proposes the first adoption of contrastive learning to mitigate speech model bias in underperforming subgroups. We employ a three-level learning technique that guides the model in focusing on different scopes for the contrastive loss, i.e., task, subgroup, and the errors within subgroups. The experiments on two spoken language understanding datasets and two languages demonstrate that our approach improves internal subgroup representations, thus reducing model bias and enhancing performance.
Read more6/24/2024