Model Debiasing by Learnable Data Augmentation

Read original: arXiv:2408.04955 - Published 8/12/2024 by Pietro Morerio, Ruggero Ragonesi, Vittorio Murino
Total Score

0

Model Debiasing by Learnable Data Augmentation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes a method for debiasing machine learning models by learning data augmentation policies.
  • The key idea is to automatically learn data augmentation strategies that can reduce biases in the training data and improve model robustness.
  • The authors evaluate their approach on several datasets and find it can outperform existing debiasing techniques.

Plain English Explanation

The paper tackles the problem of model debiasing, where machine learning models can pick up on unintended biases in the training data. This can lead to models making unfair or inaccurate predictions, especially for underrepresented groups.

The key insight is that we can learn data augmentation policies - essentially, automatically finding ways to transform the training data to reduce biases. This could involve techniques like adversarial data augmentation or language-guided debiasing.

The authors show that by optimizing the data augmentation policies as part of the training process, they can improve the model's fairness and robustness compared to other debiasing methods. This is an interesting direction for making machine learning systems more equitable and reliable.

Technical Explanation

The paper formalizes the problem of model debiasing as learning a set of data augmentation policies that can reduce the model's reliance on spurious correlations in the training data. The authors propose an [end-to-end trainable framework that jointly optimizes the model parameters and the data augmentation policies.

The key components are:

  • Learnable Data Augmentation: The augmentation policies are represented as neural networks that can transform the input data. These policies are trained alongside the main model to minimize bias.
  • Bias-aware Loss: The loss function incorporates terms to penalize the model's reliance on biased features and encourage fairness across different groups.
  • Adversarial Training: An adversarial module is used to discover the most biased examples, which are then used to update the augmentation policies.

The authors evaluate their approach on several datasets, including CelebA and COCO, and find that it outperforms existing debiasing techniques in terms of fairness metrics and overall performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach for debiasing machine learning models. The key strengths are:

  • Automated Debiasing: The ability to learn data augmentation policies removes the need for manual feature engineering or heuristic-based debiasing methods.
  • End-to-end Optimization: Jointly optimizing the model and augmentation policies allows for more effective bias reduction compared to separate debiasing steps.
  • Broad Applicability: The framework is general and can be applied to a wide range of datasets and model architectures.

However, the paper also has some limitations:

  • Computational Complexity: The adversarial training and joint optimization can be computationally intensive, especially for large-scale datasets.
  • Lack of Interpretability: The learned augmentation policies may be difficult to interpret, making it hard to understand how the debiasing is actually occurring.
  • Dataset Dependence: The effectiveness of the approach may still depend on the specific characteristics of the training data and the nature of the biases present.

Further research could explore ways to address these limitations, such as privacy-preserving debiasing or explainable debiasing methods. Overall, this paper represents an important step towards more robust and fair machine learning systems.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel approach for model debiasing by automatically learning data augmentation policies. By jointly optimizing the model and the augmentation strategies, the method can effectively reduce biases in the training data and improve the fairness and robustness of the resulting models.

This work highlights the potential of machine learning-based debiasing techniques to address the growing concerns around bias and fairness in AI systems. As machine learning becomes more pervasive in high-stakes applications, developing effective debiasing methods will be crucial for ensuring these systems are equitable and reliable.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Model Debiasing by Learnable Data Augmentation
Total Score

0

Model Debiasing by Learnable Data Augmentation

Pietro Morerio, Ruggero Ragonesi, Vittorio Murino

Deep Neural Networks are well known for efficiently fitting training data, yet experiencing poor generalization capabilities whenever some kind of bias dominates over the actual task labels, resulting in models learning shortcuts. In essence, such models are often prone to learn spurious correlations between data and labels. In this work, we tackle the problem of learning from biased data in the very realistic unsupervised scenario, i.e., when the bias is unknown. This is a much harder task as compared to the supervised case, where auxiliary, bias-related annotations, can be exploited in the learning process. This paper proposes a novel 2-stage learning pipeline featuring a data augmentation strategy able to regularize the training. First, biased/unbiased samples are identified by training over-biased models. Second, such subdivision (typically noisy) is exploited within a data augmentation framework, properly combining the original samples while learning mixing parameters, which has a regularization effect. Experiments on synthetic and realistic biased datasets show state-of-the-art classification accuracy, outperforming competing methods, ultimately proving robust performance on both biased and unbiased examples. Notably, being our training method totally agnostic to the level of bias, it also positively affects performance for any, even apparently unbiased, dataset, thus improving the model generalization regardless of the level of bias (or its absence) in the data.

Read more

8/12/2024

Looking at Model Debiasing through the Lens of Anomaly Detection
Total Score

0

Looking at Model Debiasing through the Lens of Anomaly Detection

Vito Paolo Pastore, Massimiliano Ciranni, Davide Marinelli, Francesca Odone, Vittorio Murino

It is widely recognized that deep neural networks are sensitive to bias in the data. This means that during training these models are likely to learn spurious correlations between data and labels, resulting in limited generalization abilities and low performance. In this context, model debiasing approaches can be devised aiming at reducing the model's dependency on such unwanted correlations, either leveraging the knowledge of bias information or not. In this work, we focus on the latter and more realistic scenario, showing the importance of accurately predicting the bias-conflicting and bias-aligned samples to obtain compelling performance in bias mitigation. On this ground, we propose to conceive the problem of model bias from an out-of-distribution perspective, introducing a new bias identification method based on anomaly detection. We claim that when data is mostly biased, bias-conflicting samples can be regarded as outliers with respect to the bias-aligned distribution in the feature space of a biased model, thus allowing for precisely detecting them with an anomaly detection method. Coupling the proposed bias identification approach with bias-conflicting data upsampling and augmentation in a two-step strategy, we reach state-of-the-art performance on synthetic and real benchmark datasets. Ultimately, our proposed approach shows that the data bias issue does not necessarily require complex debiasing methods, given that an accurate bias identification procedure is defined.

Read more

7/26/2024

Privacy-Preserving Debiasing using Data Augmentation and Machine Unlearning
Total Score

0

Privacy-Preserving Debiasing using Data Augmentation and Machine Unlearning

Zhixin Pan, Emma Andrews, Laura Chang, Prabhat Mishra

Data augmentation is widely used to mitigate data bias in the training dataset. However, data augmentation exposes machine learning models to privacy attacks, such as membership inference attacks. In this paper, we propose an effective combination of data augmentation and machine unlearning, which can reduce data bias while providing a provable defense against known attacks. Specifically, we maintain the fairness of the trained model with diffusion-based data augmentation, and then utilize multi-shard unlearning to remove identifying information of original data from the ML model for protection against privacy attacks. Experimental evaluation across diverse datasets demonstrates that our approach can achieve significant improvements in bias reduction as well as robustness against state-of-the-art privacy attacks.

Read more

4/23/2024

Boosting Model Resilience via Implicit Adversarial Data Augmentation
Total Score

0

Boosting Model Resilience via Implicit Adversarial Data Augmentation

Xiaoling Zhou, Wei Ye, Zhemg Lee, Rui Xie, Shikun Zhang

Data augmentation plays a pivotal role in enhancing and diversifying training data. Nonetheless, consistently improving model performance in varied learning scenarios, especially those with inherent data biases, remains challenging. To address this, we propose to augment the deep features of samples by incorporating their adversarial and anti-adversarial perturbation distributions, enabling adaptive adjustment in the learning difficulty tailored to each sample's specific characteristics. We then theoretically reveal that our augmentation process approximates the optimization of a surrogate loss function as the number of augmented copies increases indefinitely. This insight leads us to develop a meta-learning-based framework for optimizing classifiers with this novel loss, introducing the effects of augmentation while bypassing the explicit augmentation process. We conduct extensive experiments across four common biased learning scenarios: long-tail learning, generalized long-tail learning, noisy label learning, and subpopulation shift learning. The empirical results demonstrate that our method consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, highlighting its broad adaptability.

Read more

6/4/2024