Data Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models and Text-to-Image Models via Adaptive Sampling
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes an adaptive sampling method to efficiently evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) and text-to-image models.
- The method aims to provide accurate and data-efficient evaluations by prioritizing the most informative samples during the evaluation process.
- The approach is demonstrated on various benchmarks for LLMs and text-to-image models, showing improved performance compared to standard evaluation methods.
Plain English Explanation
Evaluating the performance of large language models (LLMs) and text-to-image models can be a challenging task, as these models are becoming increasingly complex and powerful. The traditional approach of using a fixed set of evaluation examples may not be the most efficient or effective way to assess these models.
This paper introduces an adaptive sampling method that aims to improve the data efficiency of model evaluations. The key idea is to focus on the most informative samples during the evaluation process, rather than using a fixed set of examples. By prioritizing the samples that provide the most valuable information about the model's performance, the researchers were able to achieve accurate evaluations while using fewer data points.
This approach is particularly useful for evaluating large language models and text-to-image models, as these models can be computationally expensive to run and may require a large number of examples to assess their performance accurately. By using the adaptive sampling method, the researchers were able to achieve similar results to standard evaluation methods while using significantly less data.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach on a variety of benchmarks for LLMs and text-to-image models, showcasing the potential of this method to streamline the evaluation process and provide more efficient and reliable assessments of these advanced AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes an adaptive sampling method for efficiently evaluating the performance of large language models (LLMs) and text-to-image models. The key idea is to prioritize the most informative samples during the evaluation process, rather than using a fixed set of examples.
The researchers first define a set of evaluation tasks, such as language understanding, generation, or image captioning. For each task, they construct a large pool of potential evaluation examples, which can be drawn from existing datasets or generated synthetically.
Next, the adaptive sampling method is applied to select a subset of the most informative examples from this pool. The method works by iteratively updating a model that predicts the "informativeness" of each sample, based on the model's performance on that sample and the diversity of the selected examples. Samples that are predicted to be more informative are then prioritized for inclusion in the final evaluation set.
The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on a variety of benchmarks for LLMs and text-to-image models, including [mllm-bench-evaluating-multimodal-llms-per-sample], [exploring-precision-recall-to-assess-quality-diversity], [tinybenchmarks-evaluating-llms-fewer-examples], and [automating-dataset-updates-towards-reliable-timely-evaluation]. They show that the adaptive sampling method can achieve similar or better performance compared to standard evaluation methods, while using significantly fewer data points.
The paper also discusses the potential limitations of the approach, such as the risk of overfitting to the specific tasks or datasets used in the evaluation. The researchers suggest that further research is needed to explore the generalization of the adaptive sampling method to a wider range of AI models and applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to the evaluation of large language models and text-to-image models, which are becoming increasingly important in the field of artificial intelligence. The adaptive sampling method proposed in the paper offers a way to achieve accurate and data-efficient evaluations, which is a significant challenge given the computational expense and complexity of these models.
One potential limitation of the approach is the reliance on predicting the "informativeness" of each sample, which may not always align with the actual importance or relevance of the sample for a specific application or use case. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for the adaptive sampling method to introduce biases or skew the evaluation results, as the selection of samples is not random but rather guided by the informativeness prediction model.
Another area for further research could be the exploration of the adaptive sampling method's applicability to other types of AI models, beyond just language and vision models. The paper focuses on these domains, but the principles behind the adaptive sampling approach may be useful for evaluating a wider range of AI systems.
Overall, the paper presents a well-designed and thoughtful approach to the evaluation of large language models and text-to-image models. While there are some areas for potential improvement or further research, the adaptive sampling method offers a promising direction for making model evaluations more efficient and reliable, which could have significant implications for the development and deployment of these advanced AI systems.
Conclusion
The paper introduces an adaptive sampling method for efficiently evaluating the performance of large language models (LLMs) and text-to-image models. By prioritizing the most informative samples during the evaluation process, the researchers were able to achieve accurate assessments while using significantly less data than traditional evaluation methods.
The adaptive sampling approach has the potential to streamline the evaluation of complex AI models, which is a critical step in the development and deployment of these advanced systems. The paper's findings suggest that this method could be particularly useful for [large-language-models-are-inconsistent-biased-evaluators], where the evaluation process can be computationally expensive and time-consuming.
Overall, this research represents an important contribution to the field of AI model evaluation, and the adaptive sampling method could have far-reaching implications for how we assess the performance and capabilities of large language models, text-to-image models, and other advanced AI systems in the future.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Data Efficient Evaluation of Large Language Models and Text-to-Image Models via Adaptive Sampling
Cong Xu, Gayathri Saranathan, Mahammad Parwez Alam, Arpit Shah, James Lim, Soon Yee Wong, Foltin Martin, Suparna Bhattacharya
Evaluating LLMs and text-to-image models is a computationally intensive task often overlooked. Efficient evaluation is crucial for understanding the diverse capabilities of these models and enabling comparisons across a growing number of new models and benchmarks. To address this, we introduce SubLIME, a data-efficient evaluation framework that employs adaptive sampling techniques, such as clustering and quality-based methods, to create representative subsets of benchmarks. Our approach ensures statistically aligned model rankings compared to full datasets, evidenced by high Pearson correlation coefficients. Empirical analysis across six NLP benchmarks reveals that: (1) quality-based sampling consistently achieves strong correlations (0.85 to 0.95) with full datasets at a 10% sampling rate such as Quality SE and Quality CPD (2) clustering methods excel in specific benchmarks such as MMLU (3) no single method universally outperforms others across all metrics. Extending this framework, we leverage the HEIM leaderboard to cover 25 text-to-image models on 17 different benchmarks. SubLIME dynamically selects the optimal technique for each benchmark, significantly reducing evaluation costs while preserving ranking integrity and score distribution. Notably, a minimal sampling rate of 1% proves effective for benchmarks like MMLU. Additionally, we demonstrate that employing difficulty-based sampling to target more challenging benchmark segments enhances model differentiation with broader score distributions. We also combine semantic search, tool use, and GPT-4 review to identify redundancy across benchmarks within specific LLM categories, such as coding benchmarks. This allows us to further reduce the number of samples needed to maintain targeted rank preservation. Overall, SubLIME offers a versatile and cost-effective solution for the robust evaluation of LLMs and text-to-image models.
Read more6/26/2024
0
MLLM-Bench: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs with Per-sample Criteria
Wentao Ge, Shunian Chen, Guiming Hardy Chen, Junying Chen, Zhihong Chen, Nuo Chen, Wenya Xie, Shuo Yan, Chenghao Zhu, Ziyue Lin, Song Dingjie, Xidong Wang, Anningzhe Gao, Zhang Zhiyi, Jianquan Li, Xiang Wan, Benyou Wang
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have broadened the scope of AI applications. Existing automatic evaluation methodologies for MLLMs are mainly limited in evaluating queries without considering user experiences, inadequately addressing the nuances of creative and associative multimodal tasks. However, the open-ended and subjective nature of such tasks poses a significant challenge to the evaluation methodology, where it is difficult to define the ground-truth answers for them. To this end, in our paper, we propose a new evaluation paradigm for MLLMs, which is evaluating MLLMs with per-sample criteria using potent MLLM as the judge. To validate the feasibility and effectiveness of this paradigm, we design a benchmark, dubbed MLLM-Bench, by curating the evaluation samples across six comprehensive cognitive levels. We benchmark 21 popular MLLMs in a pairwise-comparison fashion, showing diverse performance across models. Moreover, the validity of our benchmark manifests itself in reaching 88.02% agreement with human evaluation. We contend that the proposed paradigm explores the potential of MLLMs as effective evaluation tools with the help of per-sample criteria. See online leaderboard at url{https://mllm-bench.llmzoo.com}.
Read more9/17/2024
0
LIME-M: Less Is More for Evaluation of MLLMs
Kang Zhu, Qianbo Zang, Shian Jia, Siwei Wu, Feiteng Fang, Yizhi Li, Shuyue Guo, Tianyu Zheng, Bo Li, Haoning Wu, Xingwei Qu, Jian Yang, Zachary Liu, Xiang Yue, J. H. Liu, Chenghua Lin, Min Yang, Shiwen Ni, Wenhao Huang, Ge Zhang
With the remarkable success achieved by Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), numerous benchmarks have been designed to assess MLLMs' ability to guide their development in image perception tasks (e.g., image captioning and visual question answering). However, the existence of numerous benchmarks results in a substantial computational burden when evaluating model performance across all of them. Moreover, these benchmarks contain many overly simple problems or challenging samples, which do not effectively differentiate the capabilities among various MLLMs. To address these challenges, we propose a pipeline to process the existing benchmarks, which consists of two modules: (1) Semi-Automated Screening Process and (2) Eliminating Answer Leakage. The Semi-Automated Screening Process filters out samples that cannot distinguish the model's capabilities by synthesizing various MLLMs and manually evaluating them. The Eliminate Answer Leakage module filters samples whose answers can be inferred without images. Finally, we curate the LIME-M: Less Is More for Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs, a lightweight Multimodal benchmark that can more effectively evaluate the performance of different models. Our experiments demonstrate that: LIME-M can better distinguish the performance of different MLLMs with fewer samples (24% of the original) and reduced time (23% of the original); LIME-M eliminates answer leakage, focusing mainly on the information within images; The current automatic metric (i.e., CIDEr) is insufficient for evaluating MLLMs' capabilities in captioning. Moreover, removing the caption task score when calculating the overall score provides a more accurate reflection of model performance differences. All our codes and data are released at https://github.com/kangreen0210/LIME-M.
Read more9/12/2024
📉
0
Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs
Florian Le Bronnec, Alexandre Verine, Benjamin Negrevergne, Yann Chevaleyre, Alexandre Allauzen
We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textsc{Llama-2} and textsc{Mistral}, focusing on importing Precision and Recall metrics from image generation to text generation. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora. By conducting a comprehensive evaluation of state-of-the-art language models, the study reveals new insights into their performance on open-ended generation tasks, which are not adequately captured by traditional benchmarks. The findings highlight a trade-off between the quality and diversity of generated samples, particularly when models are fine-tuned on instruction dataset or with human feedback. This work extends the toolkit for distribution-based NLP evaluation, offering insights into the practical capabilities and challenges that current LLMs face in generating diverse and high-quality text. We release our code and data.
Read more6/5/2024