A Data Generation Perspective to the Mechanism of In-Context Learning
0
📊
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- In-Context Learning (ICL) enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to learn from a few examples during inference, without requiring gradient updates.
- Despite successful empirical results, the underlying mechanisms of ICL are not well understood.
- This paper proposes a data generation perspective to reinterpret recent ICL research and establish a more systematic understanding.
Plain English Explanation
ICL Empowers LLMs for Downstream Generalization Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. In-Context Learning (ICL) gives these models the ability to learn new tasks from just a few examples, without requiring extensive retraining. This allows the models to adapt and generalize to different scenarios, rather than being limited to their original training.
Understanding the Mechanisms of ICL While ICL has shown impressive results, the reasons behind its success are still unclear. Existing research offers various perspectives on how ICL works, proposing technical solutions and intuitive explanations. However, these efforts have been somewhat ad-hoc, lacking a cohesive, systematic understanding.
Reinterpreting ICL through Data Generation This paper takes a data generation viewpoint to reexamine recent ICL research. By framing the problem in terms of skill learning and skill recognition, the authors provide a more rigorous conceptual foundation. They also identify common themes and strengths across different technical approaches, laying the groundwork for future research to build on the best ideas.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a data generation perspective to better understand the mechanisms behind In-Context Learning (ICL). The authors define two key concepts: skill learning and skill recognition.
Skill Learning: The ability to learn new data generation functions from the in-context examples provided during inference. Skill Recognition: The ability to recognize which data generation function should be applied to a given input, without actually learning a new function.
The paper then examines various technical solutions for ICL through the lens of these two concepts. It finds that many existing approaches, though presented differently, share common underlying principles related to data generation. By highlighting these connections, the authors establish a more systematic foundation for understanding and advancing ICL research.
Critical Analysis
The paper offers a valuable reframing of ICL research from a data generation perspective. This helps unify disparate technical approaches and provides a clearer conceptual foundation for the field.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of ICL. For example, it does not explore the robustness of ICL, or whether the learned skills can generalize beyond the specific in-context examples provided. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the computational and memory requirements of different ICL techniques, which could be an important practical consideration.
Further research is needed to fully understand the strengths, weaknesses, and broader implications of ICL. The data generation viewpoint proposed in this paper is a promising step towards a more systematic understanding, but there are likely other important factors to consider as well.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel data generation perspective to reinterpret and unify recent research on In-Context Learning (ICL) in large language models. By defining the concepts of skill learning and skill recognition, the authors provide a more rigorous conceptual foundation for understanding ICL's mechanisms and successes.
The paper's systematic analysis of technical solutions highlights common underlying principles, establishing a solid base for future research to build upon. While the data generation viewpoint is a valuable contribution, further work is needed to explore the limitations and broader implications of ICL.
Overall, this paper takes an important step towards a more comprehensive understanding of ICL, which could unlock new capabilities and applications for large language models in the years to come.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
0
A Data Generation Perspective to the Mechanism of In-Context Learning
Haitao Mao, Guangliang Liu, Yao Ma, Rongrong Wang, Kristen Johnson, Jiliang Tang
In-Context Learning (ICL) empowers Large Language Models (LLMs) with the capacity to learn in context, achieving downstream generalization without gradient updates but with a few in-context examples. Despite the encouraging empirical success, the underlying mechanism of ICL remains unclear, and existing research offers various viewpoints of understanding. These studies propose intuition-driven and ad-hoc technical solutions for interpreting ICL, illustrating an ambiguous road map. In this paper, we leverage a data generation perspective to reinterpret recent efforts and demonstrate the potential broader usage of popular technical solutions, approaching a systematic angle. For a conceptual definition, we rigorously adopt the terms of skill learning and skill recognition. The difference between them is skill learning can learn new data generation functions from in-context data. We also provide a comprehensive study on the merits and weaknesses of different solutions, and highlight the uniformity among them given the perspective of data generation, establishing a technical foundation for future research to incorporate the strengths of different lines of research.
Read more8/19/2024
🌿
0
A Survey on In-context Learning
Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Lei Li, Zhifang Sui
With the increasing capabilities of large language models (LLMs), in-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a new paradigm for natural language processing (NLP), where LLMs make predictions based on contexts augmented with a few examples. It has been a significant trend to explore ICL to evaluate and extrapolate the ability of LLMs. In this paper, we aim to survey and summarize the progress and challenges of ICL. We first present a formal definition of ICL and clarify its correlation to related studies. Then, we organize and discuss advanced techniques, including training strategies, prompt designing strategies, and related analysis. Additionally, we explore various ICL application scenarios, such as data engineering and knowledge updating. Finally, we address the challenges of ICL and suggest potential directions for further research. We hope that our work can encourage more research on uncovering how ICL works and improving ICL.
Read more6/19/2024
🌀
0
In-context Learning Generalizes, But Not Always Robustly: The Case of Syntax
Aaron Mueller, Albert Webson, Jackson Petty, Tal Linzen
In-context learning (ICL) is now a common method for teaching large language models (LLMs) new tasks: given labeled examples in the input context, the LLM learns to perform the task without weight updates. Do models guided via ICL infer the underlying structure of the task defined by the context, or do they rely on superficial heuristics that only generalize to identically distributed examples? We address this question using transformations tasks and an NLI task that assess sensitivity to syntax - a requirement for robust language understanding. We further investigate whether out-of-distribution generalization can be improved via chain-of-thought prompting, where the model is provided with a sequence of intermediate computation steps that illustrate how the task ought to be performed. In experiments with models from the GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2 families, we find large variance across LMs. The variance is explained more by the composition of the pre-training corpus and supervision methods than by model size; in particular, models pre-trained on code generalize better, and benefit more from chain-of-thought prompting.
Read more4/11/2024
👨🏫
0
Implicit In-context Learning
Zhuowei Li, Zihao Xu, Ligong Han, Yunhe Gao, Song Wen, Di Liu, Hao Wang, Dimitris N. Metaxas
In-context Learning (ICL) empowers large language models (LLMs) to adapt to unseen tasks during inference by prefixing a few demonstration examples prior to test queries. Despite its versatility, ICL incurs substantial computational and memory overheads compared to zero-shot learning and is susceptible to the selection and order of demonstration examples. In this work, we introduce Implicit In-context Learning (I2CL), an innovative paradigm that addresses the challenges associated with traditional ICL by absorbing demonstration examples within the activation space. I2CL first generates a condensed vector representation, namely a context vector, from the demonstration examples. It then integrates the context vector during inference by injecting a linear combination of the context vector and query activations into the model's residual streams. Empirical evaluation on nine real-world tasks across three model architectures demonstrates that I2CL achieves few-shot performance with zero-shot cost and exhibits robustness against the variation of demonstration examples. Furthermore, I2CL facilitates a novel representation of task-ids, enhancing task similarity detection and enabling effective transfer learning. We provide a comprehensive analysis of I2CL, offering deeper insights into its mechanisms and broader implications for ICL. The source code is available at: https://github.com/LzVv123456/I2CL.
Read more5/24/2024