In-context Learning Generalizes, But Not Always Robustly: The Case of Syntax
2311.07811
0
0
🌀
Abstract
In-context learning (ICL) is now a common method for teaching large language models (LLMs) new tasks: given labeled examples in the input context, the LLM learns to perform the task without weight updates. Do models guided via ICL infer the underlying structure of the task defined by the context, or do they rely on superficial heuristics that only generalize to identically distributed examples? We address this question using transformations tasks and an NLI task that assess sensitivity to syntax - a requirement for robust language understanding. We further investigate whether out-of-distribution generalization can be improved via chain-of-thought prompting, where the model is provided with a sequence of intermediate computation steps that illustrate how the task ought to be performed. In experiments with models from the GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2 families, we find large variance across LMs. The variance is explained more by the composition of the pre-training corpus and supervision methods than by model size; in particular, models pre-trained on code generalize better, and benefit more from chain-of-thought prompting.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines how large language models (LLMs) learn new tasks through in-context learning (ICL), where the model is given labeled examples in the input context to perform the task without weight updates.
- The researchers investigate whether models guided via ICL infer the underlying structure of the task or rely on superficial heuristics that only generalize to identically distributed examples.
- They use transformation tasks and a natural language inference (NLI) task to assess the models' sensitivity to syntax, a key requirement for robust language understanding.
- The paper also explores whether out-of-distribution generalization can be improved through chain-of-thought prompting, where the model is provided with a sequence of intermediate computation steps.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how large language models (LLMs) like GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2 learn new tasks through a technique called in-context learning (ICL). In ICL, the model is given some examples of the task in the input, and it tries to learn how to do the task without actually changing its internal weights or parameters.
The researchers wanted to understand if the models are truly learning the underlying structure of the task, or if they are just relying on surface-level patterns in the examples that might not generalize well. To test this, they used tasks that involve syntactic understanding, which is important for robust language skills.
They also looked at whether providing the models with a step-by-step "chain of thought" explanation of how to do the task could help the models generalize better to examples that are different from the training data.
The results showed a lot of variability between different LLMs - some did much better than others at these tasks. The researchers found that the models' performance had more to do with the content of their training data (e.g., whether it included a lot of code) and the training methods used, rather than just the overall size of the model.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates whether language models guided by in-context learning (ICL) truly learn the underlying structure of the task defined by the context, or if they instead rely on superficial heuristics that only generalize well to examples drawn from the same distribution as the training data.
To assess this, the authors use transformation tasks and a natural language inference (NLI) task that require sensitivity to syntax, which is a key component of robust language understanding. They also explore whether out-of-distribution generalization can be improved through chain-of-thought prompting, where the model is provided with a sequence of intermediate computation steps.
Experiments are conducted with models from the GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2 families. The results show large variance in performance across language models. This variance is explained more by the composition of the pre-training corpus and the supervision methods used, rather than just model size. In particular, models pre-trained on code generalize better and benefit more from chain-of-thought prompting.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a nuanced and thorough investigation of the capabilities and limitations of in-context learning in large language models. By using tasks that require syntactic understanding, the researchers are able to probe beyond simple pattern matching and assess the models' ability to learn the underlying structure of the given tasks.
One potential limitation of the study is the relatively small set of tasks and language models evaluated. While the authors do consider a diverse set of models, including GPT, PaLM, and Llama 2, expanding the experiment to a wider range of tasks and models could strengthen the generalizability of the findings.
Additionally, the paper does not deeply explore the specific mechanisms by which the models' pre-training data and supervision methods influence their in-context learning performance. Further research delving into these underlying factors could provide valuable insights for improving the robustness and generalization capabilities of language models.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of in-context learning and highlights the need for continued research to develop language models with more sophisticated and flexible learning abilities.
Conclusion
This paper sheds light on the extent to which large language models can truly learn the underlying structure of tasks through in-context learning, rather than relying on surface-level heuristics. By using syntactic tasks as a probe, the researchers find that performance varies greatly across different LLMs, with the composition of the pre-training data and supervision methods playing a more significant role than model size alone.
The finding that models pre-trained on code generalize better and benefit more from chain-of-thought prompting suggests that the development of more robust and flexible language understanding capabilities may require a multifaceted approach, incorporating diverse training data and explicit instruction on reasoning processes. As the field of large language models continues to evolve, this paper serves as a valuable contribution to our understanding of their capabilities and limitations in learning new tasks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis
Jiaoda Li, Yifan Hou, Mrinmaya Sachan, Ryan Cotterell
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit an intriguing ability to learn a novel task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration, termed in-context learning (ICL). Understandably, a swath of research has been dedicated to uncovering the theories underpinning ICL. One popular hypothesis explains ICL by task selection. LLMs identify the task based on the demonstration and generalize it to the prompt. Another popular hypothesis is that ICL is a form of meta-learning, i.e., the models learn a learning algorithm at pre-training time and apply it to the demonstration. Finally, a third hypothesis argues that LLMs use the demonstration to select a composition of tasks learned during pre-training to perform ICL. In this paper, we empirically explore these three hypotheses that explain LLMs' ability to learn in context with a suite of experiments derived from common text classification tasks. We invalidate the first two hypotheses with counterexamples and provide evidence in support of the last hypothesis. Our results suggest an LLM could learn a novel task in context via composing tasks learned during pre-training.
6/11/2024
🌿
A Survey on In-context Learning
Qingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng, Jingyuan Ma, Rui Li, Heming Xia, Jingjing Xu, Zhiyong Wu, Baobao Chang, Xu Sun, Lei Li, Zhifang Sui
0
0
With the increasing capabilities of large language models (LLMs), in-context learning (ICL) has emerged as a new paradigm for natural language processing (NLP), where LLMs make predictions based on contexts augmented with a few examples. It has been a significant trend to explore ICL to evaluate and extrapolate the ability of LLMs. In this paper, we aim to survey and summarize the progress and challenges of ICL. We first present a formal definition of ICL and clarify its correlation to related studies. Then, we organize and discuss advanced techniques, including training strategies, prompt designing strategies, and related analysis. Additionally, we explore various ICL application scenarios, such as data engineering and knowledge updating. Finally, we address the challenges of ICL and suggest potential directions for further research. We hope that our work can encourage more research on uncovering how ICL works and improving ICL.
6/19/2024
Language Models can Exploit Cross-Task In-context Learning for Data-Scarce Novel Tasks
Anwoy Chatterjee, Eshaan Tanwar, Subhabrata Dutta, Tanmoy Chakraborty
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed NLP with their remarkable In-context Learning (ICL) capabilities. Automated assistants based on LLMs are gaining popularity; however, adapting them to novel tasks is still challenging. While colossal models excel in zero-shot performance, their computational demands limit widespread use, and smaller language models struggle without context. This paper investigates whether LLMs can generalize from labeled examples of predefined tasks to novel tasks. Drawing inspiration from biological neurons and the mechanistic interpretation of the Transformer architecture, we explore the potential for information sharing across tasks. We design a cross-task prompting setup with three LLMs and show that LLMs achieve significant performance improvements despite no examples from the target task in the context. Cross-task prompting leads to a remarkable performance boost of 107% for LLaMA-2 7B, 18.6% for LLaMA-2 13B, and 3.2% for GPT 3.5 on average over zero-shot prompting, and performs comparable to standard in-context learning. The effectiveness of generating pseudo-labels for in-task examples is demonstrated, and our analyses reveal a strong correlation between the effect of cross-task examples and model activation similarities in source and target input tokens. This paper offers a first-of-its-kind exploration of LLMs' ability to solve novel tasks based on contextual signals from different task examples.
6/13/2024
👨🏫
Implicit In-context Learning
Zhuowei Li, Zihao Xu, Ligong Han, Yunhe Gao, Song Wen, Di Liu, Hao Wang, Dimitris N. Metaxas
0
0
In-context Learning (ICL) empowers large language models (LLMs) to adapt to unseen tasks during inference by prefixing a few demonstration examples prior to test queries. Despite its versatility, ICL incurs substantial computational and memory overheads compared to zero-shot learning and is susceptible to the selection and order of demonstration examples. In this work, we introduce Implicit In-context Learning (I2CL), an innovative paradigm that addresses the challenges associated with traditional ICL by absorbing demonstration examples within the activation space. I2CL first generates a condensed vector representation, namely a context vector, from the demonstration examples. It then integrates the context vector during inference by injecting a linear combination of the context vector and query activations into the model's residual streams. Empirical evaluation on nine real-world tasks across three model architectures demonstrates that I2CL achieves few-shot performance with zero-shot cost and exhibits robustness against the variation of demonstration examples. Furthermore, I2CL facilitates a novel representation of task-ids, enhancing task similarity detection and enabling effective transfer learning. We provide a comprehensive analysis of I2CL, offering deeper insights into its mechanisms and broader implications for ICL. The source code is available at: https://github.com/LzVv123456/I2CL.
5/24/2024