A Data-Informed Analysis of Scalable Supervision for Safety in Autonomous Vehicle Fleets
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a data-informed analysis of scalable supervision for improving safety in autonomous vehicle fleets.
- The researchers explore methods to efficiently collect and utilize human feedback to train safer autonomous driving systems.
- The paper covers related work, technical details of their approach, experimental results, and a critical analysis of the proposed techniques.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper are looking at ways to make self-driving car systems safer and more reliable. One key challenge with autonomous vehicles is ensuring they can handle all possible driving situations safely, which is difficult to achieve through standard machine learning alone.
The researchers propose using human supervision - getting feedback from people on how the self-driving cars are performing - as a way to improve the safety of these systems at scale. By collecting data from many human supervisors and incorporating it into the training of the autonomous driving models, the goal is to create vehicles that are more robust and can handle a wider range of real-world driving scenarios.
The technical approach involves developing systems to efficiently collect and process this human feedback data, and then using it to fine-tune the autonomous driving models. The researchers test their methods through experiments on simulated and real-world driving data, and find that the human-supervised models demonstrate improved safety compared to autonomous systems trained solely on machine learning data.
Technical Explanation
Related Work Section II
The paper first discusses prior research on improving the safety of autonomous vehicles. This includes work on developing better machine learning models, testing systems in simulation, and techniques for robust perception and control. However, the authors note these approaches have limitations in handling all possible driving situations, motivating the need for scalable human supervision.
Approach Section III
The core of the researchers' approach involves collecting feedback from human supervisors on the performance of autonomous vehicles, and then using this data to fine-tune the driving models. This includes systems for efficiently soliciting and aggregating the human evaluations, as well as techniques to effectively incorporate the feedback signals into the model training process.
Experiments Section IV
The paper describes a series of experiments evaluating the proposed human supervision approach. This includes testing on simulated driving scenarios as well as real-world data collected from autonomous vehicle fleets. The results demonstrate that the human-supervised models exhibit improved safety metrics compared to baseline autonomous systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful analysis of the limitations of current autonomous driving techniques and the potential benefits of incorporating scalable human feedback. However, the authors acknowledge that their approach also has some drawbacks, such as the cost and effort required to collect and process the human supervision data.
Additionally, there are open questions around the best ways to solicit meaningful feedback from human supervisors, handle biases or inconsistencies in the data, and seamlessly integrate the human signals into the autonomous system training. Further research would be needed to fully address these challenges.
Conclusion
This paper makes a compelling case for leveraging human supervision as a key component in developing safer and more reliable autonomous vehicle systems. By combining the strengths of machine learning with targeted human feedback, the researchers demonstrate a pathway to creating self-driving cars that can handle a broader range of real-world driving scenarios. While there are still hurdles to overcome, this work represents an important step forward in the quest for autonomous vehicle safety.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Data-Informed Analysis of Scalable Supervision for Safety in Autonomous Vehicle Fleets
Cameron Hickert, Zhongxia Yan, Cathy Wu
Autonomous driving is a highly anticipated approach toward eliminating roadway fatalities. At the same time, the bar for safety is both high and costly to verify. This work considers the role of remotely-located human operators supervising a fleet of autonomous vehicles (AVs) for safety. Such a 'scalable supervision' concept was previously proposed to bridge the gap between still-maturing autonomy technology and the pressure to begin commercial offerings of autonomous driving. The present article proposes DISCES, a framework for Data-Informed Safety-Critical Event Simulation, to investigate the practicality of this concept from a dynamic network loading standpoint. With a focus on the safety-critical context of AVs merging into mixed-autonomy traffic, vehicular arrival processes at 1,097 highway merge points are modeled using microscopic traffic reconstruction with historical data from interstates across three California counties. Combined with a queuing theoretic model, these results characterize the dynamic supervision requirements and thereby scalability of the teleoperation approach. Across all scenarios we find reductions in operator requirements greater than 99% as compared to in-vehicle supervisors for the time period analyzed. The work also demonstrates two methods for reducing these empirical supervision requirements: (i) the use of cooperative connected AVs -- which are shown to produce an average 3.67 orders-of-magnitude system reliability improvement across the scenarios studied -- and (ii) aggregation across larger regions.
Read more9/17/2024
0
Towards Safe and Robust Autonomous Vehicle Platooning: A Self-Organizing Cooperative Control Framework
Chengkai Xu, Zihao Deng, Jiaqi Liu, Chao Huang, Peng Hang
In the emerging hybrid traffic flow environment, which includes both human-driven vehicles (HDVs) and autonomous vehicles (AVs), ensuring safe and robust decision-making and control is crucial for the effective operation of autonomous vehicle platooning. Current systems for cooperative adaptive cruise control and lane changing are inadequate in responding to real-world emergency situations, limiting the potential of autonomous vehicle platooning technology. To address the aforementioned challenges, we propose a Twin-World Safety-Enhanced Data-Model-Knowledge Hybrid-Driven autonomous vehicle platooning Cooperative Control Framework. Within this framework, a deep reinforcement learning formation decision model integrating traffic priors is designed, and a twin-world deduction model based on safety priority judgment is proposed. Subsequently, an optimal control-based multi-scenario decision-control right adaptive switching mechanism is designed to achieve adaptive switching between data-driven and model-driven methods. Through simulation experiments and hardware-in-loop tests, our algorithm has demonstrated excellent performance in terms of safety, robustness, and flexibility. A detailed account of the validation results for the model can be found in url{https://perfectxu88.github.io/towardssafeandrobust.github.io/}.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Evaluation of autonomous systems under data distribution shifts
Daniel Sikar, Artur Garcez
We posit that data can only be safe to use up to a certain threshold of the data distribution shift, after which control must be relinquished by the autonomous system and operation halted or handed to a human operator. With the use of a computer vision toy example we demonstrate that network predictive accuracy is impacted by data distribution shifts and propose distance metrics between training and testing data to define safe operation limits within said shifts. We conclude that beyond an empirically obtained threshold of the data distribution shift, it is unreasonable to expect network predictive accuracy not to degrade
Read more7/1/2024
🏅
0
Diagnosing and Predicting Autonomous Vehicle Operational Safety Using Multiple Simulation Modalities and a Virtual Environment
Joe Beck, Shean Huff, Subhadeep Chakraborty
Even as technology and performance gains are made in the sphere of automated driving, safety concerns remain. Vehicle simulation has long been seen as a tool to overcome the cost associated with a massive amount of on-road testing for development and discovery of safety critical edge-cases. However, purely software-based vehicle models may leave a large realism gap between their real-world counterparts in terms of dynamic response, and highly realistic vehicle-in-the-loop (VIL) simulations that encapsulate a virtual world around a physical vehicle may still be quite expensive to produce and similarly time intensive as on-road testing. In this work, we demonstrate an AV simulation test bed that combines the realism of vehicle-in-the-loop (VIL) simulation with the ease of implementation of model-in-the-loop (MIL) simulation. The setup demonstrated in this work allows for response diagnosis for the VIL simulations. By observing causal links between virtual weather and lighting conditions that surround the virtual depiction of our vehicle, the vision-based perception model and controller of Openpilot, and the dynamic response of our physical vehicle under test, we can draw conclusions regarding how the perceived environment contributed to vehicle response. Conversely, we also demonstrate response prediction for the MIL setup, where the need for a physical vehicle is not required to draw richer conclusions around the impact of environmental conditions on AV performance than could be obtained with VIL simulation alone. These combine for a simulation setup with accurate real-world implications for edge-case discovery that is both cost effective and time efficient to implement.
Read more5/14/2024