Evaluation of autonomous systems under data distribution shifts
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper evaluates the performance of autonomous systems under data distribution shifts, which occur when the real-world data the system encounters differs from the data it was trained on.
- The authors propose a framework for systematically analyzing the robustness of autonomous systems to distribution shifts, and demonstrate their approach on several case studies.
- Key insights include the importance of testing autonomous systems under a variety of distribution shifts, and the need for new evaluation metrics and methods to assess their safety and reliability in the face of changing data.
Plain English Explanation
Autonomous systems, like self-driving cars or robots, are trained on datasets to learn how to operate in the real world. However, the actual data they encounter during deployment may be quite different from the training data. This phenomenon, known as a distribution shift, can cause the system to perform poorly or make dangerous mistakes.
The researchers in this paper developed a framework to systematically test how autonomous systems handle these distribution shifts. They looked at several case studies, like a self-driving car navigating a city with different weather or traffic conditions than it was trained on. By analyzing the system's performance under these shifted conditions, they were able to identify vulnerabilities and areas for improvement.
Their key finding is that it's crucial to test autonomous systems under a wide range of real-world scenarios, not just the specific conditions they were trained on. Traditional evaluation metrics may not be enough to assess the safety and reliability of these systems when the data changes. New methods are needed to better quantify the impact of distribution shifts and enhance the robustness of autonomous systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a framework for evaluating the performance of autonomous systems under data distribution shifts. The key components of their approach include:
-
Characterizing distribution shifts: The authors define different types of distribution shifts, such as changes in input features, label distributions, or causal relationships, that can affect system performance.
-
Targeted evaluation: They design specific test scenarios to trigger these distribution shifts and measure the system's response, going beyond standard i.i.d. evaluation.
-
Robustness metrics: The paper introduces new performance metrics that capture an autonomous system's ability to maintain reliable and safe operation under distribution shifts, such as worst-case performance and uncertainty quantification.
The authors demonstrate their framework on case studies involving autonomous driving, robotics, and natural language processing systems. Their results highlight the importance of comprehensive testing under distribution shifts, and the need for new evaluation methodologies to ensure the safety and reliability of autonomous systems in the real world.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution by drawing attention to the critical issue of distribution shifts and their impact on autonomous systems. The proposed framework offers a structured approach to systematically evaluate robustness, which is an important step forward.
However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research. For example, the framework focuses on targeted distribution shifts, but in practice, multiple shifts may occur simultaneously, leading to complex interactions that are difficult to anticipate. Additionally, the proposed robustness metrics may not capture all relevant aspects of system performance, and their practical implementation could be challenging.
Another potential concern is the reliance on specific test scenarios, which may not fully reflect the inherent complexity and unpredictability of real-world environments. Expanding the scope of distribution shifts and developing more adaptive evaluation methods could further enhance the framework's utility.
Overall, this paper makes a strong case for the urgent need to address distribution shifts in autonomous systems. While the proposed framework is a valuable step, continued research and innovation in this area will be essential to ensure the safe and reliable deployment of these transformative technologies.
Conclusion
This paper presents a systematic framework for evaluating the robustness of autonomous systems to data distribution shifts, a critical challenge that can undermine the safety and reliability of these technologies. By introducing new evaluation metrics and testing methodologies, the authors highlight the importance of comprehensive real-world validation beyond standard i.i.d. evaluation.
The insights from this research can inform the development of more robust and adaptable autonomous systems, capable of maintaining safe and reliable operation as they encounter diverse and changing environments. Continued progress in this area will be crucial as these technologies become increasingly integrated into our daily lives, from self-driving cars to intelligent robots and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Evaluation of autonomous systems under data distribution shifts
Daniel Sikar, Artur Garcez
We posit that data can only be safe to use up to a certain threshold of the data distribution shift, after which control must be relinquished by the autonomous system and operation halted or handed to a human operator. With the use of a computer vision toy example we demonstrate that network predictive accuracy is impacted by data distribution shifts and propose distance metrics between training and testing data to define safe operation limits within said shifts. We conclude that beyond an empirically obtained threshold of the data distribution shift, it is unreasonable to expect network predictive accuracy not to degrade
Read more7/1/2024
0
When to Accept Automated Predictions and When to Defer to Human Judgment?
Daniel Sikar, Artur Garcez, Tillman Weyde, Robin Bloomfield, Kaleem Peeroo
Ensuring the reliability and safety of automated decision-making is crucial. It is well-known that data distribution shifts in machine learning can produce unreliable outcomes. This paper proposes a new approach for measuring the reliability of predictions under distribution shifts. We analyze how the outputs of a trained neural network change using clustering to measure distances between outputs and class centroids. We propose this distance as a metric to evaluate the confidence of predictions under distribution shifts. We assign each prediction to a cluster with centroid representing the mean softmax output for all correct predictions of a given class. We then define a safety threshold for a class as the smallest distance from an incorrect prediction to the given class centroid. We evaluate the approach on the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets using a Convolutional Neural Network and a Vision Transformer, respectively. The results show that our approach is consistent across these data sets and network models, and indicate that the proposed metric can offer an efficient way of determining when automated predictions are acceptable and when they should be deferred to human operators given a distribution shift.
Read more8/14/2024
0
New!A Data-Informed Analysis of Scalable Supervision for Safety in Autonomous Vehicle Fleets
Cameron Hickert, Zhongxia Yan, Cathy Wu
Autonomous driving is a highly anticipated approach toward eliminating roadway fatalities. At the same time, the bar for safety is both high and costly to verify. This work considers the role of remotely-located human operators supervising a fleet of autonomous vehicles (AVs) for safety. Such a 'scalable supervision' concept was previously proposed to bridge the gap between still-maturing autonomy technology and the pressure to begin commercial offerings of autonomous driving. The present article proposes DISCES, a framework for Data-Informed Safety-Critical Event Simulation, to investigate the practicality of this concept from a dynamic network loading standpoint. With a focus on the safety-critical context of AVs merging into mixed-autonomy traffic, vehicular arrival processes at 1,097 highway merge points are modeled using microscopic traffic reconstruction with historical data from interstates across three California counties. Combined with a queuing theoretic model, these results characterize the dynamic supervision requirements and thereby scalability of the teleoperation approach. Across all scenarios we find reductions in operator requirements greater than 99% as compared to in-vehicle supervisors for the time period analyzed. The work also demonstrates two methods for reducing these empirical supervision requirements: (i) the use of cooperative connected AVs -- which are shown to produce an average 3.67 orders-of-magnitude system reliability improvement across the scenarios studied -- and (ii) aggregation across larger regions.
Read more9/17/2024
🔮
0
How Safe Am I Given What I See? Calibrated Prediction of Safety Chances for Image-Controlled Autonomy
Zhenjiang Mao, Carson Sobolewski, Ivan Ruchkin
End-to-end learning has emerged as a major paradigm for developing autonomous systems. Unfortunately, with its performance and convenience comes an even greater challenge of safety assurance. A key factor of this challenge is the absence of the notion of a low-dimensional and interpretable dynamical state, around which traditional assurance methods revolve. Focusing on the online safety prediction problem, this paper proposes a configurable family of learning pipelines based on generative world models, which do not require low-dimensional states. To implement these pipelines, we overcome the challenges of learning safety-informed latent representations and missing safety labels under prediction-induced distribution shift. These pipelines come with statistical calibration guarantees on their safety chance predictions based on conformal prediction. We perform an extensive evaluation of the proposed learning pipelines on two case studies of image-controlled systems: a racing car and a cartpole.
Read more6/21/2024