Debiasing Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process samplers using couplings

Read original: arXiv:2306.15422 - Published 9/9/2024 by Adrien Corenflos, Matthew Sutton, Nicolas Chopin
Total Score

0

Debiasing Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process samplers using couplings

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses a method for debiasing Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process (PDMP) samplers using couplings.
  • PDMP samplers are a type of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm used for sampling from probability distributions.
  • The proposed method aims to reduce the bias in PDMP samplers and improve their performance.

Plain English Explanation

Imagine you want to estimate the average height of people in a city. You could go around and measure everyone's height, but that would take a long time. Instead, you could take a few random samples of people and use that to estimate the average height.

This is similar to what PDMP samplers do. They take a few random samples from a probability distribution, and then use those samples to estimate properties of the distribution, like the average or the spread.

However, the samples taken by PDMP samplers can be slightly biased, meaning they don't perfectly represent the true distribution. The paper presents a way to debias the samples by using a technique called "couplings".

Couplings work by running two versions of the PDMP sampler in parallel, and then using the relationship between them to reduce the bias. This allows the PDMP sampler to produce more accurate estimates of the distribution's properties.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a method for debiasing Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process (PDMP) samplers using couplings. PDMP samplers are a type of Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm used for sampling from probability distributions.

The key idea is to run two copies of the PDMP sampler in parallel, and then use the relationship between the two copies to reduce the bias in the samples. This is achieved by carefully constructing the coupling between the two PDMP processes, ensuring that they converge to the same target distribution while minimizing the difference between them.

The paper provides a theoretical analysis of the proposed debiasing method, showing that it can significantly reduce the bias in PDMP samplers under certain conditions. The authors also demonstrate the effectiveness of the method through experiments on several benchmark problems.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel approach to debiasing PDMP samplers, which is an important contribution to the field of MCMC sampling. The use of couplings is a well-established technique in MCMC, but the authors have shown how it can be effectively applied to PDMP samplers.

One potential limitation of the method is that it may be computationally more expensive than standard PDMP sampling, as it requires running two copies of the sampler in parallel. The paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational overhead, which would be useful for understanding the practical implications of the method.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the theoretical properties of the debiasing method, but does not explore its performance on a wide range of real-world problems. Further empirical evaluation on a diverse set of tasks would be valuable to assess the method's practical applicability and limitations.

Conclusion

The paper presents a method for debiasing PDMP samplers using couplings, which can significantly improve the accuracy of MCMC sampling. The proposed approach has strong theoretical foundations and shows promising results in experiments. While there are some potential limitations, the paper represents an important step forward in the development of more reliable and effective MCMC algorithms.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Debiasing Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process samplers using couplings
Total Score

0

Debiasing Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process samplers using couplings

Adrien Corenflos, Matthew Sutton, Nicolas Chopin

Monte Carlo methods -- such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and piecewise deterministic Markov process (PDMP) samplers -- provide asymptotically exact estimators of expectations under a target distribution. There is growing interest in alternatives to this asymptotic regime, in particular in constructing estimators that are exact in the limit of an infinite amount of computing processors, rather than in the limit of an infinite number of Markov iterations. In particular, Jacob et al. (2020) introduced coupled MCMC estimators to remove the non-asymptotic bias, resulting in MCMC estimators that can be embarrassingly parallelised. In this work, we extend the estimators of Jacob et al. (2020) to the continuous-time context and derive couplings for the bouncy, the boomerang and the coordinate samplers. Some preliminary empirical results are included that demonstrate the reasonable scaling of our method with the dimension of the target.

Read more

9/9/2024

Stochastic Gradient Piecewise Deterministic Monte Carlo Samplers
Total Score

0

Stochastic Gradient Piecewise Deterministic Monte Carlo Samplers

Paul Fearnhead, Sebastiano Grazzi, Chris Nemeth, Gareth O. Roberts

Recent work has suggested using Monte Carlo methods based on piecewise deterministic Markov processes (PDMPs) to sample from target distributions of interest. PDMPs are non-reversible continuous-time processes endowed with momentum, and hence can mix better than standard reversible MCMC samplers. Furthermore, they can incorporate exact sub-sampling schemes which only require access to a single (randomly selected) data point at each iteration, yet without introducing bias to the algorithm's stationary distribution. However, the range of models for which PDMPs can be used, particularly with sub-sampling, is limited. We propose approximate simulation of PDMPs with sub-sampling for scalable sampling from posterior distributions. The approximation takes the form of an Euler approximation to the true PDMP dynamics, and involves using an estimate of the gradient of the log-posterior based on a data sub-sample. We thus call this class of algorithms stochastic-gradient PDMPs. Importantly, the trajectories of stochastic-gradient PDMPs are continuous and can leverage recent ideas for sampling from measures with continuous and atomic components. We show these methods are easy to implement, present results on their approximation error and demonstrate numerically that this class of algorithms has similar efficiency to, but is more robust than, stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics.

Read more

6/28/2024

Piecewise deterministic generative models
Total Score

0

Piecewise deterministic generative models

Andrea Bertazzi, Alain Oliviero-Durmus, Dario Shariatian, Umut Simsekli, Eric Moulines

We introduce a novel class of generative models based on piecewise deterministic Markov processes (PDMPs), a family of non-diffusive stochastic processes consisting of deterministic motion and random jumps at random times. Similarly to diffusions, such Markov processes admit time reversals that turn out to be PDMPs as well. We apply this observation to three PDMPs considered in the literature: the Zig-Zag process, Bouncy Particle Sampler, and Randomised Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. For these three particular instances, we show that the jump rates and kernels of the corresponding time reversals admit explicit expressions depending on some conditional densities of the PDMP under consideration before and after a jump. Based on these results, we propose efficient training procedures to learn these characteristics and consider methods to approximately simulate the reverse process. Finally, we provide bounds in the total variation distance between the data distribution and the resulting distribution of our model in the case where the base distribution is the standard $d$-dimensional Gaussian distribution. Promising numerical simulations support further investigations into this class of models.

Read more

7/30/2024

📉

Total Score

0

Tractable MCMC for Private Learning with Pure and Gaussian Differential Privacy

Yingyu Lin, Yi-An Ma, Yu-Xiang Wang, Rachel Redberg, Zhiqi Bu

Posterior sampling, i.e., exponential mechanism to sample from the posterior distribution, provides $varepsilon$-pure differential privacy (DP) guarantees and does not suffer from potentially unbounded privacy breach introduced by $(varepsilon,delta)$-approximate DP. In practice, however, one needs to apply approximate sampling methods such as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), thus re-introducing the unappealing $delta$-approximation error into the privacy guarantees. To bridge this gap, we propose the Approximate SAample Perturbation (abbr. ASAP) algorithm which perturbs an MCMC sample with noise proportional to its Wasserstein-infinity ($W_infty$) distance from a reference distribution that satisfies pure DP or pure Gaussian DP (i.e., $delta=0$). We then leverage a Metropolis-Hastings algorithm to generate the sample and prove that the algorithm converges in $W_infty$ distance. We show that by combining our new techniques with a localization step, we obtain the first nearly linear-time algorithm that achieves the optimal rates in the DP-ERM problem with strongly convex and smooth losses.

Read more

5/2/2024