Tractable MCMC for Private Learning with Pure and Gaussian Differential Privacy

Overview

• The paper proposes a new algorithm called Approximate SAample Perturbation (ASAP) that provides strong differential privacy guarantees while using approximate sampling methods.
• Posterior sampling, which provides strict differential privacy, can suffer from unbounded privacy breach when using approximate sampling methods like Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC).
• ASAP perturbs an MCMC sample with noise proportional to its distance from a reference distribution that satisfies pure differential privacy.
• The authors show that ASAP converges in Wasserstein-infinity distance and can be combined with a localization step to achieve optimal rates for the differentially private empirical risk minimization (DP-ERM) problem.

Plain English Explanation

Differentially private algorithms are designed to protect individual privacy when analyzing sensitive data. One approach is posterior sampling, which involves sampling from the posterior distribution of a statistical model. This provides strong privacy guarantees, as each sample is individually private.

However, in practice, we often need to use approximate sampling methods like Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) to draw samples from the posterior. This can reintroduce errors that reduce the privacy guarantees, making the overall system less private.

The ASAP algorithm proposed in this paper aims to bridge this gap. ASAP takes an MCMC sample and adds noise to it, where the amount of noise depends on how far the sample is from a "reference" distribution that is known to satisfy strict differential privacy. This ensures the final sample is also private, even when using approximate sampling.

The authors show that ASAP can be combined with a "localization" step to create an algorithm that is both private and efficient, achieving the best-known performance for the differentially private empirical risk minimization (DP-ERM) problem. DP-ERM is an important problem in machine learning, where we want to train a model while protecting the privacy of the training data.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of the paper is the ASAP algorithm, which perturbs an MCMC sample to achieve differential privacy guarantees. Specifically, ASAP adds noise to the MCMC sample proportional to its Wasserstein-infinity distance from a "reference" distribution that satisfies pure differential privacy or pure Gaussian differential privacy (i.e., δ=0).

The authors prove that ASAP converges in Wasserstein-infinity distance, meaning the perturbed samples are close to the true posterior distribution. They then show that by combining ASAP with a localization step, they can obtain the first nearly linear-time algorithm that achieves optimal rates for the DP-ERM problem with strongly convex and smooth losses.

This is significant because DP-ERM is a fundamental problem in differentially private machine learning, with applications in areas like next-token prediction in large language models and distributed optimization under inequality constraints. The ASAP algorithm provides a way to achieve strong privacy guarantees while maintaining computational efficiency.

Critical Analysis

The key strength of the ASAP algorithm is that it provides strong differential privacy guarantees while using approximate sampling methods like MCMC. This addresses a significant practical limitation of posterior sampling, which can suffer from unbounded privacy breach when using such methods.

However, the paper does not discuss the potential limitations or downsides of the ASAP approach. For example, the noise addition step may introduce significant distortion in the final samples, potentially impacting the accuracy of downstream tasks. Additionally, the reliance on a "reference" distribution that satisfies pure differential privacy may be challenging to obtain in practice.

Furthermore, the paper focuses on the theoretical analysis and does not provide extensive empirical evaluation of ASAP's performance compared to other differentially private algorithms. More experimental results, especially on real-world datasets and tasks, would help demonstrate the practical benefits and limitations of the proposed approach.

Overall, the ASAP algorithm represents an interesting and potentially valuable contribution to the field of differentially private machine learning. However, further research is needed to fully understand its practical implications and limitations.

Conclusion

The ASAP algorithm proposed in this paper addresses a key challenge in differentially private machine learning: how to maintain strong privacy guarantees when using approximate sampling methods like MCMC. By perturbing MCMC samples based on their distance from a reference distribution, ASAP can provide strict differential privacy while still achieving computational efficiency.

The authors show that ASAP can be combined with a localization step to obtain the first nearly linear-time algorithm that achieves optimal rates for the differentially private empirical risk minimization (DP-ERM) problem. This is a significant result, as DP-ERM is a fundamental problem with applications in areas like language modeling and distributed optimization.

While the theoretical analysis is promising, further research is needed to fully understand the practical implications and limitations of the ASAP approach. Nonetheless, this work represents an important contribution to the field of differentially private machine learning and could pave the way for more efficient and private algorithms in the future.