Deep learning for precipitation nowcasting: A survey from the perspective of time series forecasting
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of deep learning approaches for precipitation nowcasting, which is the task of forecasting rainfall in the near future (e.g., 0-6 hours).
- The authors examine these techniques from the perspective of time series forecasting, analyzing the similarities and differences between precipitation nowcasting and other time series prediction problems.
- The paper covers the latest advancements in deep learning models, data sources, and evaluation metrics for precipitation nowcasting, offering insights for both researchers and practitioners in the field.
Plain English Explanation
Precipitation nowcasting is the challenge of predicting how much it will rain or snow in the next few hours. This is an important task for weather forecasting, as it helps people prepare for sudden changes in the weather. This paper explores how deep learning, a type of artificial intelligence, can be used to improve precipitation nowcasting.
The authors look at the similarities and differences between precipitation nowcasting and other types of time series forecasting, such as predicting stock prices or energy demand. They review the latest deep learning models and techniques that have been developed for this task, as well as the data sources and evaluation methods used to measure their performance.
By understanding how deep learning can be applied to precipitation nowcasting, researchers and weather forecasters can develop more accurate and reliable systems to predict the weather in the near future. This can help people plan their activities, prepare for severe weather, and make more informed decisions.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing an overview of the precipitation nowcasting problem and its importance for weather forecasting. The authors then examine the similarities and differences between precipitation nowcasting and other time series forecasting tasks, such as the need to model spatial and temporal dependencies in the data.
Next, the paper reviews the latest deep learning models that have been applied to precipitation nowcasting, including convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), and hybrid architectures that combine these approaches. The authors discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these models, as well as the data sources and preprocessing techniques that are commonly used.
The paper also covers the evaluation metrics and benchmarking procedures that are used to assess the performance of precipitation nowcasting models. This includes metrics such as mean absolute error, root mean squared error, and skill scores that compare the model's predictions to a baseline or reference forecast.
Finally, the authors discuss some of the challenges and limitations of deep learning for precipitation nowcasting, such as the need to model complex physical processes like advection and convection, and the difficulty of generalizing models to new geographic regions or weather patterns. They also highlight promising directions for future research, such as the use of multi-modal data sources and the integration of physical models with deep learning approaches.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-structured review of deep learning for precipitation nowcasting, covering a wide range of models, data sources, and evaluation metrics. The authors do a good job of highlighting the similarities and differences between precipitation nowcasting and other time series forecasting tasks, which helps to situate the research within a broader context.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve too deeply into the specific architectural details and training methodologies of the deep learning models discussed. While the high-level overview is useful, some readers may want more technical details to better understand the inner workings of these approaches.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the challenges and limitations of deep learning for precipitation nowcasting in more depth. For example, the authors mention the difficulty of modeling complex physical processes like advection and convection, but do not provide a thorough discussion of how current deep learning models struggle with these challenges and what potential solutions may be on the horizon.
Overall, the paper is a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners interested in the application of deep learning to precipitation nowcasting. The authors provide a comprehensive and well-organized survey of the field, which can serve as a starting point for further exploration and experimentation.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive survey of deep learning approaches for precipitation nowcasting, examining the task from the perspective of time series forecasting. The authors review the latest advancements in deep learning models, data sources, and evaluation metrics, offering insights for both researchers and practitioners in the field.
By understanding how deep learning can be applied to precipitation nowcasting, researchers and weather forecasters can develop more accurate and reliable systems to predict the weather in the near future. This can have significant implications for a wide range of industries and communities, helping people plan their activities, prepare for severe weather, and make more informed decisions.
While the paper highlights some of the challenges and limitations of deep learning for precipitation nowcasting, it also points to promising directions for future research, such as the integration of physical models and the use of multi-modal data sources. As the field continues to evolve, this survey provides a valuable reference for understanding the current state of the art and identifying opportunities for further innovation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Deep learning for precipitation nowcasting: A survey from the perspective of time series forecasting
Sojung An, Tae-Jin Oh, Eunha Sohn, Donghyun Kim
Deep learning-based time series forecasting has dominated the short-term precipitation forecasting field with the help of its ability to estimate motion flow in high-resolution datasets. The growing interest in precipitation nowcasting offers substantial opportunities for the advancement of current forecasting technologies. Nevertheless, there has been a scarcity of in-depth surveys of time series precipitation forecasting using deep learning. Thus, this paper systemically reviews recent progress in time series precipitation forecasting models. Specifically, we investigate the following key points within background components, covering: i) preprocessing, ii) objective functions, and iii) evaluation metrics. We then categorize forecasting models into textit{recursive} and textit{multiple} strategies based on their approaches to predict future frames, investigate the impacts of models using the strategies, and performance assessments. Finally, we evaluate current deep learning-based models for precipitation forecasting on a public benchmark, discuss their limitations and challenges, and present some promising research directions. Our contribution lies in providing insights for a better understanding of time series precipitation forecasting and in aiding the development of robust AI solutions for the future.
Read more6/17/2024
🖼️
0
Forecasting the Future with Future Technologies: Advancements in Large Meteorological Models
Hailong Shu, Yue Wang, Weiwei Song, Huichuang Guo, Zhen Song
The field of meteorological forecasting has undergone a significant transformation with the integration of large models, especially those employing deep learning techniques. This paper reviews the advancements and applications of these models in weather prediction, emphasizing their role in transforming traditional forecasting methods. Models like FourCastNet, Pangu-Weather, GraphCast, ClimaX, and FengWu have made notable contributions by providing accurate, high-resolution forecasts, surpassing the capabilities of traditional Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models. These models utilize advanced neural network architectures, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), and Transformers, to process diverse meteorological data, enhancing predictive accuracy across various time scales and spatial resolutions. The paper addresses challenges in this domain, including data acquisition and computational demands, and explores future opportunities for model optimization and hardware advancements. It underscores the integration of artificial intelligence with conventional meteorological techniques, promising improved weather prediction accuracy and a significant contribution to addressing climate-related challenges. This synergy positions large models as pivotal in the evolving landscape of meteorological forecasting.
Read more4/11/2024
0
Precipitation Nowcasting Using Physics Informed Discriminator Generative Models
Junzhe Yin, Cristian Meo, Ankush Roy, Zeineh Bou Cher, Yanbo Wang, Ruben Imhoff, Remko Uijlenhoet, Justin Dauwels
Nowcasting leverages real-time atmospheric conditions to forecast weather over short periods. State-of-the-art models, including PySTEPS, encounter difficulties in accurately forecasting extreme weather events because of their unpredictable distribution patterns. In this study, we design a physics-informed neural network to perform precipitation nowcasting using the precipitation and meteorological data from the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI). This model draws inspiration from the novel Physics-Informed Discriminator GAN (PID-GAN) formulation, directly integrating physics-based supervision within the adversarial learning framework. The proposed model adopts a GAN structure, featuring a Vector Quantization Generative Adversarial Network (VQ-GAN) and a Transformer as the generator, with a temporal discriminator serving as the discriminator. Our findings demonstrate that the PID-GAN model outperforms numerical and SOTA deep generative models in terms of precipitation nowcasting downstream metrics.
Read more6/17/2024
0
Time Distributed Deep Learning models for Purely Exogenous Forecasting. Application to Water Table Depth Prediction using Weather Image Time Series
Matteo Salis, Abdourrahmane M. Atto, Stefano Ferraris, Rosa Meo
Groundwater resources are one of the most relevant elements in the water cycle, therefore developing models to accurately predict them is a pivotal task in the sustainable resources management framework. Deep Learning (DL) models have been revealed very effective in hydrology, especially by feeding spatially distributed data (e.g. raster data). In many regions, hydrological measurements are difficult to obtain regularly or periodically in time, and in some cases, last available data are not up to date. Reversely, weather data, which significantly impacts water resources, are usually more available and with higher quality. More specifically, we have proposed two different DL models to predict the water table depth in the Grana-Maira catchment (Piemonte, IT) using only exogenous weather image time series. To deal with the image time series, both models are made of a first Time Distributed Convolutional Neural Network (TDC) which encodes the image available at each time step into a vectorial representation. The first model, TDC-LSTM uses then a Sequential Module based on an LSTM layer to learn temporal relations and output the predictions. The second model, TDC-UnPWaveNet uses instead a new version of the WaveNet architecture, adapted here to output a sequence shorter and completely shifted in the future with respect to the input one. To this aim, and to deal with the different sequence lengths in the UnPWaveNet, we have designed a new Channel Distributed layer, that acts like a Time Distributed one but on the channel dimension, i.e. applying the same set of operations to each channel of the input. TDC-LSTM and TDC-UnPWaveNet have shown both remarkable results. However, the two models have focused on different learnable information: TDC-LSTM has focused more on lowering the bias, while the TDC-UnPWaveNet has focused more on the temporal dynamics maximising correlation and KGE.
Read more9/23/2024