DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 is a system that combines reinforcement learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search to harness the feedback from proof assistants for improved theorem proving.
- The paper presents the technical details of this system and evaluates its performance on challenging mathematical problems.
- The key contributions of the paper include a novel approach to leveraging proof assistant feedback and advancements in reinforcement learning and search algorithms for theorem proving.
Plain English Explanation
One of the biggest challenges in theorem proving is figuring out the right sequence of logical steps to solve a given problem. DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 aims to address this by combining two powerful techniques: reinforcement learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search.
Reinforcement learning is a type of machine learning where an agent learns by interacting with an environment and receiving feedback on its actions. In the context of theorem proving, the agent is the system that's trying to find the solution, and the feedback comes from a proof assistant - a computer program that can verify the validity of a proof.
Monte-Carlo Tree Search, on the other hand, is a way of exploring possible sequences of actions (in this case, logical steps) by simulating many random "play-outs" and using the results to guide the search towards more promising paths.
By harnessing the feedback from the proof assistant and using reinforcement learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search, DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 is able to learn how to solve complex mathematical problems more effectively. This could have significant implications for fields like mathematics, computer science, and beyond, by helping researchers and problem-solvers find solutions to challenging problems more efficiently.
Technical Explanation
The key components of DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 are:
-
Reinforcement Learning: The system uses reinforcement learning to learn how to navigate the search space of possible logical steps. The agent receives feedback from the proof assistant, which indicates whether a particular sequence of steps is valid or not. This feedback is used to update the agent's policy, guiding it towards more successful paths.
-
Monte-Carlo Tree Search: DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 employs Monte-Carlo Tree Search to efficiently explore the space of possible solutions. By simulating many random "play-outs" of the proof process and analyzing the results, the system can identify promising branches of the search tree and focus its efforts on those areas.
-
Proof Assistant Integration: The system seamlessly integrates with a proof assistant, which provides feedback on the validity of the agent's proposed logical steps. This feedback is used to update the agent's policy and guide the Monte-Carlo Tree Search process.
The paper presents extensive experimental results, demonstrating the effectiveness of DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 on a range of challenging mathematical problems. The system is shown to outperform traditional theorem proving approaches, highlighting the potential of this combined reinforcement learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search approach for advancing the field of automated theorem proving.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed evaluation of DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
Dependence on Proof Assistant: The system's performance is heavily dependent on the capabilities of the proof assistant it is integrated with. If the proof assistant has limitations or biases, this could impact the system's ability to learn effectively.
-
Scalability: The paper focuses on relatively small-scale mathematical problems, and it's unclear how the system would scale to larger, more complex theorems or proofs. Exploring the system's performance on more challenging problems would be an important next step.
-
Interpretability: As with many machine learning-based systems, the inner workings of DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 may not be fully interpretable. Understanding the reasoning behind the system's decisions could be valuable for building trust and further improving the approach.
-
Generalization: The paper does not explore the system's ability to generalize its learned knowledge to new, unseen problems. Investigating the system's transfer learning capabilities could be an interesting area of future research.
Overall, the DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 paper presents a promising approach to leveraging proof assistant feedback for improved theorem proving, and the results are impressive. However, further research is needed to address the potential limitations and explore the system's broader applicability.
Conclusion
The DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 system represents a significant step forward in the field of automated theorem proving. By combining reinforcement learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search, the system is able to effectively harness the feedback from proof assistants to guide its search for solutions to complex mathematical problems.
This innovative approach has the potential to greatly accelerate progress in fields that rely on theorem proving, such as mathematics, computer science, and beyond. As the system's capabilities are further developed and its limitations are addressed, it could become a powerful tool in the hands of researchers and problem-solvers, helping them tackle increasingly challenging problems more efficiently.
The critical analysis highlights areas for future research, such as improving the system's scalability, interpretability, and generalization capabilities. Addressing these areas could further enhance the effectiveness and versatility of DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5, ultimately leading to even greater advancements in the field of automated theorem proving.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5: Harnessing Proof Assistant Feedback for Reinforcement Learning and Monte-Carlo Tree Search
Huajian Xin, Z. Z. Ren, Junxiao Song, Zhihong Shao, Wanjia Zhao, Haocheng Wang, Bo Liu, Liyue Zhang, Xuan Lu, Qiushi Du, Wenjun Gao, Qihao Zhu, Dejian Yang, Zhibin Gou, Z. F. Wu, Fuli Luo, Chong Ruan
We introduce DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5, an open-source language model designed for theorem proving in Lean 4, which enhances DeepSeek-Prover-V1 by optimizing both training and inference processes. Pre-trained on DeepSeekMath-Base with specialization in formal mathematical languages, the model undergoes supervised fine-tuning using an enhanced formal theorem proving dataset derived from DeepSeek-Prover-V1. Further refinement is achieved through reinforcement learning from proof assistant feedback (RLPAF). Beyond the single-pass whole-proof generation approach of DeepSeek-Prover-V1, we propose RMaxTS, a variant of Monte-Carlo tree search that employs an intrinsic-reward-driven exploration strategy to generate diverse proof paths. DeepSeek-Prover-V1.5 demonstrates significant improvements over DeepSeek-Prover-V1, achieving new state-of-the-art results on the test set of the high school level miniF2F benchmark ($63.5%$) and the undergraduate level ProofNet benchmark ($25.3%$).
Read more8/16/2024
📊
0
DeepSeek-Prover: Advancing Theorem Proving in LLMs through Large-Scale Synthetic Data
Huajian Xin, Daya Guo, Zhihong Shao, Zhizhou Ren, Qihao Zhu, Bo Liu, Chong Ruan, Wenda Li, Xiaodan Liang
Proof assistants like Lean have revolutionized mathematical proof verification, ensuring high accuracy and reliability. Although large language models (LLMs) show promise in mathematical reasoning, their advancement in formal theorem proving is hindered by a lack of training data. To address this issue, we introduce an approach to generate extensive Lean 4 proof data derived from high-school and undergraduate-level mathematical competition problems. This approach involves translating natural language problems into formal statements, filtering out low-quality statements, and generating proofs to create synthetic data. After fine-tuning the DeepSeekMath 7B model on this synthetic dataset, which comprises 8 million formal statements with proofs, our model achieved whole-proof generation accuracies of 46.3% with 64 samples and 52% cumulatively on the Lean 4 miniF2F test, surpassing the baseline GPT-4 at 23.0% with 64 samples and a tree search reinforcement learning method at 41.0%. Additionally, our model successfully proved 5 out of 148 problems in the Lean 4 Formalized International Mathematical Olympiad (FIMO) benchmark, while GPT-4 failed to prove any. These results demonstrate the potential of leveraging large-scale synthetic data to enhance theorem-proving capabilities in LLMs. Both the synthetic dataset and the model will be made available to facilitate further research in this promising field.
Read more5/24/2024
💬
2
DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models
Zhihong Shao, Peiyi Wang, Qihao Zhu, Runxin Xu, Junxiao Song, Xiao Bi, Haowei Zhang, Mingchuan Zhang, Y. K. Li, Y. Wu, Daya Guo
Mathematical reasoning poses a significant challenge for language models due to its complex and structured nature. In this paper, we introduce DeepSeekMath 7B, which continues pre-training DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B with 120B math-related tokens sourced from Common Crawl, together with natural language and code data. DeepSeekMath 7B has achieved an impressive score of 51.7% on the competition-level MATH benchmark without relying on external toolkits and voting techniques, approaching the performance level of Gemini-Ultra and GPT-4. Self-consistency over 64 samples from DeepSeekMath 7B achieves 60.9% on MATH. The mathematical reasoning capability of DeepSeekMath is attributed to two key factors: First, we harness the significant potential of publicly available web data through a meticulously engineered data selection pipeline. Second, we introduce Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), a variant of Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), that enhances mathematical reasoning abilities while concurrently optimizing the memory usage of PPO.
Read more4/30/2024
💬
0
DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model
DeepSeek-AI, Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bin Wang, Bingxuan Wang, Bo Liu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Dengr, Chong Ruan, Damai Dai, Daya Guo, Dejian Yang, Deli Chen, Dongjie Ji, Erhang Li, Fangyun Lin, Fuli Luo, Guangbo Hao, Guanting Chen, Guowei Li, H. Zhang, Hanwei Xu, Hao Yang, Haowei Zhang, Honghui Ding, Huajian Xin, Huazuo Gao, Hui Li, Hui Qu, J. L. Cai, Jian Liang, Jianzhong Guo, Jiaqi Ni, Jiashi Li, Jin Chen, Jingyang Yuan, Junjie Qiu, Junxiao Song, Kai Dong, Kaige Gao, Kang Guan, Lean Wang, Lecong Zhang, Lei Xu, Leyi Xia, Liang Zhao, Liyue Zhang, Meng Li, Miaojun Wang, Mingchuan Zhang, Minghua Zhang, Minghui Tang, Mingming Li, Ning Tian, Panpan Huang, Peiyi Wang, Peng Zhang, Qihao Zhu, Qinyu Chen, Qiushi Du, R. J. Chen, R. L. Jin, Ruiqi Ge, Ruizhe Pan, Runxin Xu, Ruyi Chen, S. S. Li, Shanghao Lu, Shangyan Zhou, Shanhuang Chen, Shaoqing Wu, Shengfeng Ye, Shirong Ma, Shiyu Wang, Shuang Zhou, Shuiping Yu, Shunfeng Zhou, Size Zheng, T. Wang, Tian Pei, Tian Yuan, Tianyu Sun, W. L. Xiao, Wangding Zeng, Wei An, Wen Liu, Wenfeng Liang, Wenjun Gao, Wentao Zhang, X. Q. Li, Xiangyue Jin, Xianzu Wang, Xiao Bi, Xiaodong Liu, Xiaohan Wang, Xiaojin Shen, Xiaokang Chen, Xiaosha Chen, Xiaotao Nie, Xiaowen Sun, Xiaoxiang Wang, Xin Liu, Xin Xie, Xingkai Yu, Xinnan Song, Xinyi Zhou, Xinyu Yang, Xuan Lu, Xuecheng Su, Y. Wu, Y. K. Li, Y. X. Wei, Y. X. Zhu, Yanhong Xu, Yanping Huang, Yao Li, Yao Zhao, Yaofeng Sun, Yaohui Li, Yaohui Wang, Yi Zheng, Yichao Zhang, Yiliang Xiong, Yilong Zhao, Ying He, Ying Tang, Yishi Piao, Yixin Dong, Yixuan Tan, Yiyuan Liu, Yongji Wang, Yongqiang Guo, Yuchen Zhu, Yuduan Wang, Yuheng Zou, Yukun Zha, Yunxian Ma, Yuting Yan, Yuxiang You, Yuxuan Liu, Z. Z. Ren, Zehui Ren, Zhangli Sha, Zhe Fu, Zhen Huang, Zhen Zhang, Zhenda Xie, Zhewen Hao, Zhihong Shao, Zhiniu Wen, Zhipeng Xu, Zhongyu Zhang, Zhuoshu Li, Zihan Wang, Zihui Gu, Zilin Li, Ziwei Xie
We present DeepSeek-V2, a strong Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language model characterized by economical training and efficient inference. It comprises 236B total parameters, of which 21B are activated for each token, and supports a context length of 128K tokens. DeepSeek-V2 adopts innovative architectures including Multi-head Latent Attention (MLA) and DeepSeekMoE. MLA guarantees efficient inference through significantly compressing the Key-Value (KV) cache into a latent vector, while DeepSeekMoE enables training strong models at an economical cost through sparse computation. Compared with DeepSeek 67B, DeepSeek-V2 achieves significantly stronger performance, and meanwhile saves 42.5% of training costs, reduces the KV cache by 93.3%, and boosts the maximum generation throughput to 5.76 times. We pretrain DeepSeek-V2 on a high-quality and multi-source corpus consisting of 8.1T tokens, and further perform Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) to fully unlock its potential. Evaluation results show that, even with only 21B activated parameters, DeepSeek-V2 and its chat versions still achieve top-tier performance among open-source models.
Read more6/21/2024