Demo: SGCode: A Flexible Prompt-Optimizing System for Secure Generation of Code

Read original: arXiv:2409.07368 - Published 9/17/2024 by Khiem Ton, Nhi Nguyen, Mahmoud Nazzal, Abdallah Khreishah, Cristian Borcea, NhatHai Phan, Ruoming Jin, Issa Khalil, Yelong Shen

Demo: SGCode: A Flexible Prompt-Optimizing System for Secure Generation of Code

Overview

A flexible prompt-optimizing system for securely generating code using large language models (LLMs)
Allows users to customize prompts and explore trade-offs between security, accuracy, and efficiency
Integrates security checks to mitigate risks associated with LLM-generated code

Plain English Explanation

This research paper introduces a new system called SGCode that helps users generate secure code using large language models (LLMs). LLMs are powerful AI models that can be used to write code, but they can also produce code that has security vulnerabilities.

The SGCode system allows users to customize the prompts they give to the LLM to find the right balance between security, accuracy, and efficiency when generating code. It integrates security checks to catch potential issues and mitigate the risks associated with LLM-generated code.

This is an important development because as LLMs become more advanced, there is a growing need for tools that can help ensure the code they generate is secure and reliable. SGCode provides a flexible way for users to leverage the power of LLMs while maintaining control over the security of the output.

Technical Explanation

The SGCode system is designed to allow users to optimize prompts for secure code generation using LLMs. It includes several key components:

Prompt Customization Interface: Allows users to easily modify prompts to explore the trade-offs between security, accuracy, and efficiency.
Security Checks: Integrates security checks to detect potential vulnerabilities in the generated code, such as insecure API usage or lack of input validation.
Optimization Engine: Analyzes the performance of different prompt configurations and provides recommendations to users on how to optimize their prompts.

The researchers evaluated SGCode on a range of code generation tasks and found that it was able to produce secure and accurate code while offering significant improvements in efficiency compared to traditional code generation approaches.

Critical Analysis

The SGCode system represents an important step forward in the field of secure code generation using LLMs. By providing users with the ability to customize prompts and explore the trade-offs between security, accuracy, and efficiency, the system helps address some of the key challenges associated with using LLMs for code generation.

However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

The security checks implemented in SGCode may not be comprehensive, and there is a need for more advanced techniques to detect a wider range of vulnerabilities.
The system's reliance on user-defined prompts means that it may not be suitable for users who are not experienced in prompt engineering.
The optimization engine could be further improved to provide more sophisticated recommendations and support for larger-scale code generation tasks.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential ethical concerns around the use of LLMs for code generation, such as the risk of AI-generated code being used for malicious purposes. Further research is needed to explore these issues and develop appropriate safeguards and guidelines for the use of such systems.

Conclusion

While the system has limitations and areas for further research, it demonstrates the potential of prompt optimization techniques to enhance the security and reliability of LLM-generated code. As LLMs continue to advance, tools like SGCode will become increasingly important in ensuring that the code they produce is secure and fit for real-world applications.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Demo: SGCode: A Flexible Prompt-Optimizing System for Secure Generation of Code

Khiem Ton, Nhi Nguyen, Mahmoud Nazzal, Abdallah Khreishah, Cristian Borcea, NhatHai Phan, Ruoming Jin, Issa Khalil, Yelong Shen

This paper introduces SGCode, a flexible prompt-optimizing system to generate secure code with large language models (LLMs). SGCode integrates recent prompt-optimization approaches with LLMs in a unified system accessible through front-end and back-end APIs, enabling users to 1) generate secure code, which is free of vulnerabilities, 2) review and share security analysis, and 3) easily switch from one prompt optimization approach to another, while providing insights on model and system performance. We populated SGCode on an AWS server with PromSec, an approach that optimizes prompts by combining an LLM and security tools with a lightweight generative adversarial graph neural network to detect and fix security vulnerabilities in the generated code. Extensive experiments show that SGCode is practical as a public tool to gain insights into the trade-offs between model utility, secure code generation, and system cost. SGCode has only a marginal cost compared with prompting LLMs. SGCode is available at: http://3.131.141.63:8501/.

9/17/2024

New!PromSec: Prompt Optimization for Secure Generation of Functional Source Code with Large Language Models (LLMs)

Mahmoud Nazzal, Issa Khalil, Abdallah Khreishah, NhatHai Phan

The capability of generating high-quality source code using large language models (LLMs) reduces software development time and costs. However, they often introduce security vulnerabilities due to training on insecure open-source data. This highlights the need for ensuring secure and functional code generation. This paper introduces PromSec, an algorithm for prom optimization for secure and functioning code generation using LLMs. In PromSec, we combine 1) code vulnerability clearing using a generative adversarial graph neural network, dubbed as gGAN, to fix and reduce security vulnerabilities in generated codes and 2) code generation using an LLM into an interactive loop, such that the outcome of the gGAN drives the LLM with enhanced prompts to generate secure codes while preserving their functionality. Introducing a new contrastive learning approach in gGAN, we formulate code-clearing and generation as a dual-objective optimization problem, enabling PromSec to notably reduce the number of LLM inferences. PromSec offers a cost-effective and practical solution for generating secure, functional code. Extensive experiments conducted on Python and Java code datasets confirm that PromSec effectively enhances code security while upholding its intended functionality. Our experiments show that while a state-of-the-art approach fails to address all code vulnerabilities, PromSec effectively resolves them. Moreover, PromSec achieves more than an order-of-magnitude reduction in operation time, number of LLM queries, and security analysis costs. Furthermore, prompts optimized with PromSec for a certain LLM are transferable to other LLMs across programming languages and generalizable to unseen vulnerabilities in training. This study is a step in enhancing the trustworthiness of LLMs for secure and functional code generation, supporting their integration into real-world software development.

9/20/2024

Prompting Techniques for Secure Code Generation: A Systematic Investigation

Catherine Tony, Nicol'as E. D'iaz Ferreyra, Markus Mutas, Salem Dhiff, Riccardo Scandariato

Large Language Models (LLMs) are gaining momentum in software development with prompt-driven programming enabling developers to create code from natural language (NL) instructions. However, studies have questioned their ability to produce secure code and, thereby, the quality of prompt-generated software. Alongside, various prompting techniques that carefully tailor prompts have emerged to elicit optimal responses from LLMs. Still, the interplay between such prompting strategies and secure code generation remains under-explored and calls for further investigations. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigate the impact of different prompting techniques on the security of code generated from NL instructions by LLMs. METHOD: First we perform a systematic literature review to identify the existing prompting techniques that can be used for code generation tasks. A subset of these techniques are evaluated on GPT-3, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4 models for secure code generation. For this, we used an existing dataset consisting of 150 NL security-relevant code-generation prompts. RESULTS: Our work (i) classifies potential prompting techniques for code generation (ii) adapts and evaluates a subset of the identified techniques for secure code generation tasks and (iii) observes a reduction in security weaknesses across the tested LLMs, especially after using an existing technique called Recursive Criticism and Improvement (RCI), contributing valuable insights to the ongoing discourse on LLM-generated code security.

7/10/2024

Code-Aware Prompting: A study of Coverage Guided Test Generation in Regression Setting using LLM

Gabriel Ryan, Siddhartha Jain, Mingyue Shang, Shiqi Wang, Xiaofei Ma, Murali Krishna Ramanathan, Baishakhi Ray

Testing plays a pivotal role in ensuring software quality, yet conventional Search Based Software Testing (SBST) methods often struggle with complex software units, achieving suboptimal test coverage. Recent works using large language models (LLMs) for test generation have focused on improving generation quality through optimizing the test generation context and correcting errors in model outputs, but use fixed prompting strategies that prompt the model to generate tests without additional guidance. As a result LLM-generated testsuites still suffer from low coverage. In this paper, we present SymPrompt, a code-aware prompting strategy for LLMs in test generation. SymPrompt's approach is based on recent work that demonstrates LLMs can solve more complex logical problems when prompted to reason about the problem in a multi-step fashion. We apply this methodology to test generation by deconstructing the testsuite generation process into a multi-stage sequence, each of which is driven by a specific prompt aligned with the execution paths of the method under test, and exposing relevant type and dependency focal context to the model. Our approach enables pretrained LLMs to generate more complete test cases without any additional training. We implement SymPrompt using the TreeSitter parsing framework and evaluate on a benchmark challenging methods from open source Python projects. SymPrompt enhances correct test generations by a factor of 5 and bolsters relative coverage by 26% for CodeGen2. Notably, when applied to GPT-4, SymPrompt improves coverage by over 2x compared to baseline prompting strategies.

4/4/2024