Prompting Techniques for Secure Code Generation: A Systematic Investigation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores different techniques for prompting large language models (LLMs) to generate secure and reliable code.
- The researchers systematically investigate various prompting strategies to assess their impact on code quality and security.
- The findings provide insights into effective prompt engineering for secure code generation, which is crucial as LLMs are increasingly used for programming tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at different ways of asking or "prompting" large AI language models to generate computer code. The goal is to find techniques that help the models produce code that is secure and works correctly.
The researchers tested various prompting strategies to see how they impact the quality and security of the generated code. This is an important area of study as these AI language models are being used more and more for programming tasks. The insights from this work can help guide how we prompt these models to create reliable and secure code.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a systematic investigation of prompting techniques for secure code generation using large language models (LLMs). The researchers designed a set of experiments to assess the impact of different prompting strategies on the quality and security of the generated code.
The experiment design involved creating a diverse set of prompts that varied in factors like task framing, code constraints, and security requirements. The prompts were then used to generate code samples, which were evaluated using a combination of automated tests and human expert analysis.
The results provide insights into effective prompt engineering for secure code generation. The researchers found that prompts emphasizing security considerations, such as [object Object] and [object Object], led to significantly more secure code compared to prompts focused solely on functional requirements.
Additionally, the study explored the impact of other prompt features, such as the inclusion of introductory [object Object] and the use of [object Object] within the prompts.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and systematic investigation of prompt engineering for secure code generation, which is a crucial area as LLMs continue to be applied to programming tasks. The researchers' approach of designing diverse prompts and evaluating the resulting code quality and security is commendable.
However, the paper does not address potential limitations or caveats of the study. For example, it would be valuable to understand the impact of the specific LLM architecture, training data, and other model factors on the observed results. Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the quality [object Object], which is an important aspect of effective prompt engineering.
Conclusion
This paper presents a systematic investigation of prompting techniques for secure code generation using large language models. The findings highlight the importance of incorporating security considerations into prompts to generate more reliable and secure code. The insights from this research can guide the development of effective prompt engineering strategies for using LLMs in programming tasks, a crucial area as these models become more prevalent in the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Prompting Techniques for Secure Code Generation: A Systematic Investigation
Catherine Tony, Nicol'as E. D'iaz Ferreyra, Markus Mutas, Salem Dhiff, Riccardo Scandariato
Large Language Models (LLMs) are gaining momentum in software development with prompt-driven programming enabling developers to create code from natural language (NL) instructions. However, studies have questioned their ability to produce secure code and, thereby, the quality of prompt-generated software. Alongside, various prompting techniques that carefully tailor prompts have emerged to elicit optimal responses from LLMs. Still, the interplay between such prompting strategies and secure code generation remains under-explored and calls for further investigations. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigate the impact of different prompting techniques on the security of code generated from NL instructions by LLMs. METHOD: First we perform a systematic literature review to identify the existing prompting techniques that can be used for code generation tasks. A subset of these techniques are evaluated on GPT-3, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4 models for secure code generation. For this, we used an existing dataset consisting of 150 NL security-relevant code-generation prompts. RESULTS: Our work (i) classifies potential prompting techniques for code generation (ii) adapts and evaluates a subset of the identified techniques for secure code generation tasks and (iii) observes a reduction in security weaknesses across the tested LLMs, especially after using an existing technique called Recursive Criticism and Improvement (RCI), contributing valuable insights to the ongoing discourse on LLM-generated code security.
Read more7/10/2024
💬
0
You still have to study -- On the Security of LLM generated code
Stefan Goetz, Andreas Schaad
We witness an increasing usage of AI-assistants even for routine (classroom) programming tasks. However, the code generated on basis of a so called prompt by the programmer does not always meet accepted security standards. On the one hand, this may be due to lack of best-practice examples in the training data. On the other hand, the actual quality of the programmers prompt appears to influence whether generated code contains weaknesses or not. In this paper we analyse 4 major LLMs with respect to the security of generated code. We do this on basis of a case study for the Python and Javascript language, using the MITRE CWE catalogue as the guiding security definition. Our results show that using different prompting techniques, some LLMs initially generate 65% code which is deemed insecure by a trained security engineer. On the other hand almost all analysed LLMs will eventually generate code being close to 100% secure with increasing manual guidance of a skilled engineer.
Read more8/15/2024
0
Code-Aware Prompting: A study of Coverage Guided Test Generation in Regression Setting using LLM
Gabriel Ryan, Siddhartha Jain, Mingyue Shang, Shiqi Wang, Xiaofei Ma, Murali Krishna Ramanathan, Baishakhi Ray
Testing plays a pivotal role in ensuring software quality, yet conventional Search Based Software Testing (SBST) methods often struggle with complex software units, achieving suboptimal test coverage. Recent works using large language models (LLMs) for test generation have focused on improving generation quality through optimizing the test generation context and correcting errors in model outputs, but use fixed prompting strategies that prompt the model to generate tests without additional guidance. As a result LLM-generated testsuites still suffer from low coverage. In this paper, we present SymPrompt, a code-aware prompting strategy for LLMs in test generation. SymPrompt's approach is based on recent work that demonstrates LLMs can solve more complex logical problems when prompted to reason about the problem in a multi-step fashion. We apply this methodology to test generation by deconstructing the testsuite generation process into a multi-stage sequence, each of which is driven by a specific prompt aligned with the execution paths of the method under test, and exposing relevant type and dependency focal context to the model. Our approach enables pretrained LLMs to generate more complete test cases without any additional training. We implement SymPrompt using the TreeSitter parsing framework and evaluate on a benchmark challenging methods from open source Python projects. SymPrompt enhances correct test generations by a factor of 5 and bolsters relative coverage by 26% for CodeGen2. Notably, when applied to GPT-4, SymPrompt improves coverage by over 2x compared to baseline prompting strategies.
Read more4/4/2024
0
Demo: SGCode: A Flexible Prompt-Optimizing System for Secure Generation of Code
Khiem Ton, Nhi Nguyen, Mahmoud Nazzal, Abdallah Khreishah, Cristian Borcea, NhatHai Phan, Ruoming Jin, Issa Khalil, Yelong Shen
This paper introduces SGCode, a flexible prompt-optimizing system to generate secure code with large language models (LLMs). SGCode integrates recent prompt-optimization approaches with LLMs in a unified system accessible through front-end and back-end APIs, enabling users to 1) generate secure code, which is free of vulnerabilities, 2) review and share security analysis, and 3) easily switch from one prompt optimization approach to another, while providing insights on model and system performance. We populated SGCode on an AWS server with PromSec, an approach that optimizes prompts by combining an LLM and security tools with a lightweight generative adversarial graph neural network to detect and fix security vulnerabilities in the generated code. Extensive experiments show that SGCode is practical as a public tool to gain insights into the trade-offs between model utility, secure code generation, and system cost. SGCode has only a marginal cost compared with prompting LLMs. SGCode is available at: http://3.131.141.63:8501/.
Read more9/17/2024