Designing Value-Centered Consent Interfaces: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Support Patient Values in Data-Sharing Decisions
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Designed a mixed-methods approach to create value-centered consent interfaces that support patient values in data-sharing decisions
- Focused on healthcare data, which is sensitive and requires thoughtful consent processes
- Used qualitative and quantitative methods to understand patient values and incorporate them into consent interface design
Plain English Explanation
The paper describes a research study that aimed to design consent interfaces for sharing healthcare data in a way that better aligns with patients' values and preferences. Healthcare data is highly sensitive, so it's important to have consent processes that respect patients' needs and concerns.
The researchers used a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods, to understand what's important to patients when it comes to sharing their health data. They then used these insights to create consent interface designs that prioritize patient values.
This is significant because traditional consent processes often don't adequately consider the nuances of what patients really care about. By centering the patient perspective, this research aims to develop consent interfaces that empower patients to make informed decisions about their data that align with their own values.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a mixed-methods study to design value-centered consent interfaces that support patient values in healthcare data-sharing decisions. The researchers used a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to understand patient values and incorporate them into the consent interface design.
First, they conducted interviews and focus groups to explore patient perspectives on healthcare data sharing. This qualitative work helped identify key values and concerns that patients have, such as privacy, control, and the desire for reciprocal benefits.
Next, they used these insights to develop a series of consent interface prototypes. They then evaluated these prototypes through surveys and online experiments, measuring factors like usability, trust, and alignment with patient values.
The findings suggest that by centering patient values in the consent interface design process, it's possible to create more meaningful and effective data-sharing experiences. The researchers note that this approach could help address some of the limitations of traditional consent models that often fail to fully consider the patient perspective.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful and well-designed approach to developing consent interfaces that better support patient values. By combining qualitative and quantitative methods, the researchers were able to deeply understand patient perspectives and translate those insights into concrete design decisions.
One potential limitation is the scope of the study, which focused on a single health system. While the findings may be broadly applicable, further research is needed to understand how patient values may vary across different cultural and healthcare contexts. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the long-term impacts or scalability of the consent interface designs.
That said, the core concept of centering patient values in consent processes is a valuable contribution to the field of healthcare data management and ethics. As healthcare data becomes increasingly valuable and sensitive, it's crucial that consent interfaces empower patients to make informed decisions that align with their own priorities and concerns.
Conclusion
This research presents a novel approach to designing consent interfaces for healthcare data sharing that prioritizes patient values. By combining qualitative and quantitative methods, the researchers were able to develop consent interfaces that better reflect the nuances of what's important to patients.
The findings suggest that this value-centered approach can lead to more meaningful and effective data-sharing experiences, potentially addressing some of the limitations of traditional consent models. As healthcare data continues to grow in importance and sensitivity, this work offers a promising path forward for empowering patients and building trust in data-sharing practices.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Designing Value-Centered Consent Interfaces: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Support Patient Values in Data-Sharing Decisions
David Leimstadtner, Peter Sorries, Claudia-Muller Birn
In the digital health domain, ethical data collection practices are crucial for ensuring the availability of quality datasets that drive medical advancement. Data donation, allowing patients to share their clinical data for secondary research use, presents a promising resource for such datasets. Yet, current consent interfaces mediating data-sharing decisions are found to favor data-collectors' values by leveraging cognitive biases in data-subjects towards higher data-sharing rates. This raises ethical concerns about the use of data collected, as well as concerning the quality of the resulting datasets. Seeking to establish patient-centered data collection practices in digital health, we investigate the design of consent interfaces that support end-users in making value-congruent health data-sharing decisions. Focusing our research efforts on the situated context of health data donation at the psychosomatic unit of a German university hospital, we demonstrate how a human-centered design can ground technology within the perspective of a vulnerable group. We employed an exploratory sequential mixed-method approach consisting of five phases: Participatory workshops explore patient values, informing the design of a proposed Value-Centered Consent Interface. An online experiment demonstrates our interface element's effect, increasing value-congruence in data-sharing decisions. Our proposed consent interface design is then adapted to the research context through a co-creation workshop with subject experts and a user evaluation with patients. Our work contributes to recent discourse in CSCW concerning ethical implications of new data practices within their socio-technological context by exploring patient values on medical data sharing, introducing a novel consent interface to support value-congruent decision-making, and providing a situated evaluation of the proposed interface with patients.
Read more7/8/2024
📊
0
Advancing a Consent-Forward Paradigm for Digital Mental Health Data
Sachin R. Pendse, Logan Stapleton, Neha Kumar, Munmun De Choudhury, Stevie Chancellor
The field of digital mental health is advancing at a rapid pace. Passively collected data from user engagements with digital tools and services continue to contribute new insights into mental health and illness. As the field of digital mental health grows, a concerning norm has been established -- digital service users are given little say over how their data is collected, shared, or used to generate revenue for private companies. Given a long history of service user exclusion from data collection practices, we propose an alternative approach that is attentive to this history: the consent-forward paradigm. This paradigm embeds principles of affirmative consent in the design of digital mental health tools and services, strengthening trust through designing around individual choices and needs, and proactively protecting users from unexpected harm. In this perspective, we outline practical steps to implement this paradigm, toward ensuring that people searching for care have the safest experiences possible.
Read more4/24/2024
0
Insights from an experiment crowdsourcing data from thousands of US Amazon users: The importance of transparency, money, and data use
Alex Berke, Robert Mahari, Sandy Pentland, Kent Larson, D. Calacci
Data generated by users on digital platforms are a crucial resource for advocates and researchers interested in uncovering digital inequities, auditing algorithms, and understanding human behavior. Yet data access is often restricted. How can researchers both effectively and ethically collect user data? This paper shares an innovative approach to crowdsourcing user data to collect otherwise inaccessible Amazon purchase histories, spanning 5 years, from more than 5000 US users. We developed a data collection tool that prioritizes participant consent and includes an experimental study design. The design allows us to study multiple aspects of privacy perception and data sharing behavior. Experiment results (N=6325) reveal both monetary incentives and transparency can significantly increase data sharing. Age, race, education, and gender also played a role, where female and less-educated participants were more likely to share. Our study design enables a unique empirical evaluation of the privacy paradox, where users claim to value their privacy more than they do in practice. We set up both real and hypothetical data sharing scenarios and find measurable similarities and differences in share rates across these contexts. For example, increasing monetary incentives had a 6 times higher impact on share rates in real scenarios. In addition, we study participants' opinions on how data should be used by various third parties, again finding demographics have a significant impact. Notably, the majority of participants disapproved of government agencies using purchase data yet the majority approved of use by researchers. Overall, our findings highlight the critical role that transparency, incentive design, and user demographics play in ethical data collection practices, and provide guidance for future researchers seeking to crowdsource user generated data.
Read more5/15/2024
📊
0
Patient-centered data science: an integrative framework for evaluating and predicting clinical outcomes in the digital health era
Mohsen Amoei, Dan Poenaru
This study proposes a novel, integrative framework for patient-centered data science in the digital health era. We developed a multidimensional model that combines traditional clinical data with patient-reported outcomes, social determinants of health, and multi-omic data to create comprehensive digital patient representations. Our framework employs a multi-agent artificial intelligence approach, utilizing various machine learning techniques including large language models, to analyze complex, longitudinal datasets. The model aims to optimize multiple patient outcomes simultaneously while addressing biases and ensuring generalizability. We demonstrate how this framework can be implemented to create a learning healthcare system that continuously refines strategies for optimal patient care. This approach has the potential to significantly improve the translation of digital health innovations into real-world clinical benefits, addressing current limitations in AI-driven healthcare models.
Read more8/7/2024