Explainable Interface for Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Survey
2405.02583
0
0
Abstract
Nowadays, large-scale foundation models are being increasingly integrated into numerous safety-critical applications, including human-autonomy teaming (HAT) within transportation, medical, and defence domains. Consequently, the inherent 'black-box' nature of these sophisticated deep neural networks heightens the significance of fostering mutual understanding and trust between humans and autonomous systems. To tackle the transparency challenges in HAT, this paper conducts a thoughtful study on the underexplored domain of Explainable Interface (EI) in HAT systems from a human-centric perspective, thereby enriching the existing body of research in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). We explore the design, development, and evaluation of EI within XAI-enhanced HAT systems. To do so, we first clarify the distinctions between these concepts: EI, explanations and model explainability, aiming to provide researchers and practitioners with a structured understanding. Second, we contribute to a novel framework for EI, addressing the unique challenges in HAT. Last, our summarized evaluation framework for ongoing EI offers a holistic perspective, encompassing model performance, human-centered factors, and group task objectives. Based on extensive surveys across XAI, HAT, psychology, and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), this review offers multiple novel insights into incorporating XAI into HAT systems and outlines future directions.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive survey of explainable interface research for human-autonomy teaming.
- It examines how explainable interfaces can improve trust, transparency, and collaboration between humans and autonomous systems.
- The survey covers a range of topics, including explainable artificial intelligence, interpretability, and human-in-the-loop interactions.
Plain English Explanation
Autonomous systems, like self-driving cars or robotic assistants, are becoming more advanced and capable of making complex decisions on their own. However, for humans to fully trust and collaborate with these autonomous systems, it's important that the systems can explain their actions and decisions in a way that is easy for humans to understand.
This paper reviews the research on "explainable interfaces" - interfaces that allow autonomous systems to communicate their reasoning and decision-making processes to human users. By making the inner workings of these systems more transparent and interpretable, explainable interfaces can help build trust, promote better collaboration, and ensure that humans maintain appropriate oversight and control.
The paper covers a variety of topics related to explainable interfaces, such as how to design interfaces that rapidly convey information through gaze-based interactions, approaches for incorporating explanations into human-machine interfaces to improve trust, and methods for explaining the decisions of AI systems in a more human-centered way. The goal is to create seamless human-autonomy teaming where humans and machines can work together effectively.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive survey of research on explainable interfaces for human-autonomy teaming. It examines how these interfaces can improve transparency, facilitate trust, and enable effective collaboration between humans and autonomous systems.
The survey covers a wide range of topics related to explainable interfaces, including:
- Techniques for rapidly conveying information through gaze-based interactions to support real-time decision-making
- Approaches for incorporating explanations into human-machine interfaces to foster trust and appropriate reliance
- Methods for explaining the decisions of AI systems in a more human-centered way
- Strategies for enabling effective human-autonomy teaming through transparent and interpretable systems
The paper synthesizes insights from a wide range of disciplines, including human-computer interaction, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence. It highlights the key challenges and design considerations involved in developing explainable interfaces that can support seamless collaboration between humans and autonomous systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-researched overview of the current state of explainable interface research for human-autonomy teaming. However, it's important to note that this is an emerging and rapidly evolving field, and the paper may not capture the most recent advancements.
One potential limitation of the survey is that it primarily focuses on theoretical frameworks and design principles, rather than empirical evaluations of deployed systems. While the paper discusses the importance of user studies and real-world testing, more emphasis on the practical challenges and lessons learned from implementation would further strengthen the analysis.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the ethical implications of explainable interfaces, such as issues of privacy, accountability, and the potential for bias. As these systems become more prevalent, it will be crucial to consider the societal impact and ensure that they are designed and deployed responsibly.
Despite these minor caveats, the paper serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working on human-autonomy interactions. By highlighting the key concepts, design considerations, and research directions in this field, it provides a solid foundation for further exploration and innovation.
Conclusion
This comprehensive survey outlines the critical role of explainable interfaces in enabling effective human-autonomy teaming. By making the decision-making processes of autonomous systems more transparent and interpretable, these interfaces can foster trust, facilitate collaboration, and ensure appropriate human oversight and control.
The paper's in-depth coverage of topics ranging from gaze-based interactions to human-centered AI explanations underscores the multifaceted nature of this field. As autonomous systems become increasingly prevalent in our lives, the development of effective explainable interfaces will be crucial for realizing the full potential of human-autonomy teaming.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Incorporating Explanations into Human-Machine Interfaces for Trust and Situation Awareness in Autonomous Vehicles
Shahin Atakishiyev, Mohammad Salameh, Randy Goebel
0
0
Autonomous vehicles often make complex decisions via machine learning-based predictive models applied to collected sensor data. While this combination of methods provides a foundation for real-time actions, self-driving behavior primarily remains opaque to end users. In this sense, explainability of real-time decisions is a crucial and natural requirement for building trust in autonomous vehicles. Moreover, as autonomous vehicles still cause serious traffic accidents for various reasons, timely conveyance of upcoming hazards to road users can help improve scene understanding and prevent potential risks. Hence, there is also a need to supply autonomous vehicles with user-friendly interfaces for effective human-machine teaming. Motivated by this problem, we study the role of explainable AI and human-machine interface jointly in building trust in vehicle autonomy. We first present a broad context of the explanatory human-machine systems with the 3W1H (what, whom, when, how) approach. Based on these findings, we present a situation awareness framework for calibrating users' trust in self-driving behavior. Finally, we perform an experiment on our framework, conduct a user study on it, and validate the empirical findings with hypothesis testing.
4/12/2024
The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Tanja Kaser
0
0
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.
5/29/2024
Designs for Enabling Collaboration in Human-Machine Teaming via Interactive and Explainable Systems
Rohan Paleja, Michael Munje, Kimberlee Chang, Reed Jensen, Matthew Gombolay
0
0
Collaborative robots and machine learning-based virtual agents are increasingly entering the human workspace with the aim of increasing productivity and enhancing safety. Despite this, we show in a ubiquitous experimental domain, Overcooked-AI, that state-of-the-art techniques for human-machine teaming (HMT), which rely on imitation or reinforcement learning, are brittle and result in a machine agent that aims to decouple the machine and human's actions to act independently rather than in a synergistic fashion. To remedy this deficiency, we develop HMT approaches that enable iterative, mixed-initiative team development allowing end-users to interactively reprogram interpretable AI teammates. Our 50-subject study provides several findings that we summarize into guidelines. While all approaches underperform a simple collaborative heuristic (a critical, negative result for learning-based methods), we find that white-box approaches supported by interactive modification can lead to significant team development, outperforming white-box approaches alone, and black-box approaches are easier to train and result in better HMT performance highlighting a tradeoff between explainability and interactivity versus ease-of-training. Together, these findings present three important directions: 1) Improving the ability to generate collaborative agents with white-box models, 2) Better learning methods to facilitate collaboration rather than individualized coordination, and 3) Mixed-initiative interfaces that enable users, who may vary in ability, to improve collaboration.
6/10/2024
Explainable AI improves task performance in human-AI collaboration
Julian Senoner, Simon Schallmoser, Bernhard Kratzwald, Stefan Feuerriegel, Torbj{o}rn Netland
0
0
Artificial intelligence (AI) provides considerable opportunities to assist human work. However, one crucial challenge of human-AI collaboration is that many AI algorithms operate in a black-box manner where the way how the AI makes predictions remains opaque. This makes it difficult for humans to validate a prediction made by AI against their own domain knowledge. For this reason, we hypothesize that augmenting humans with explainable AI as a decision aid improves task performance in human-AI collaboration. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the effect of augmenting domain experts with explainable AI in the form of visual heatmaps. We then compare participants that were either supported by (a) black-box AI or (b) explainable AI, where the latter supports them to follow AI predictions when the AI is accurate or overrule the AI when the AI predictions are wrong. We conducted two preregistered experiments with representative, real-world visual inspection tasks from manufacturing and medicine. The first experiment was conducted with factory workers from an electronics factory, who performed $N=9,600$ assessments of whether electronic products have defects. The second experiment was conducted with radiologists, who performed $N=5,650$ assessments of chest X-ray images to identify lung lesions. The results of our experiments with domain experts performing real-world tasks show that task performance improves when participants are supported by explainable AI instead of black-box AI. For example, in the manufacturing setting, we find that augmenting participants with explainable AI (as opposed to black-box AI) leads to a five-fold decrease in the median error rate of human decisions, which gives a significant improvement in task performance.
6/13/2024