Explainable AI improves task performance in human-AI collaboration
2406.08271
0
0
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) provides considerable opportunities to assist human work. However, one crucial challenge of human-AI collaboration is that many AI algorithms operate in a black-box manner where the way how the AI makes predictions remains opaque. This makes it difficult for humans to validate a prediction made by AI against their own domain knowledge. For this reason, we hypothesize that augmenting humans with explainable AI as a decision aid improves task performance in human-AI collaboration. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the effect of augmenting domain experts with explainable AI in the form of visual heatmaps. We then compare participants that were either supported by (a) black-box AI or (b) explainable AI, where the latter supports them to follow AI predictions when the AI is accurate or overrule the AI when the AI predictions are wrong. We conducted two preregistered experiments with representative, real-world visual inspection tasks from manufacturing and medicine. The first experiment was conducted with factory workers from an electronics factory, who performed $N=9,600$ assessments of whether electronic products have defects. The second experiment was conducted with radiologists, who performed $N=5,650$ assessments of chest X-ray images to identify lung lesions. The results of our experiments with domain experts performing real-world tasks show that task performance improves when participants are supported by explainable AI instead of black-box AI. For example, in the manufacturing setting, we find that augmenting participants with explainable AI (as opposed to black-box AI) leads to a five-fold decrease in the median error rate of human decisions, which gives a significant improvement in task performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper investigates how explainable AI (XAI) can enhance task performance in collaborative human-AI systems.
- The researchers conducted experiments where participants worked with an AI assistant to complete various tasks, comparing outcomes when the AI provided explanations for its actions versus when it did not.
- The results suggest that XAI can lead to improved task performance, increased trust, and better understanding of the AI's capabilities and limitations.
Plain English Explanation
In this research, the scientists wanted to understand how making an AI system more "explainable" could affect how well people work with that AI. They had people team up with an AI assistant to do different tasks, and compared what happened when the AI provided explanations for its actions versus when it did not.
The key idea behind explainable AI (XAI) is that AI systems should be able to explain their reasoning in a way that humans can understand. This is important for building trust and helping people figure out when they can rely on the AI's suggestions versus when they may need to double-check or override them.
The researchers found that when the AI provided explanations, people were able to complete the tasks better. They also felt more trusting of the AI and had a clearer sense of its strengths and limitations. This suggests that making AI more explainable can lead to more effective human-AI collaboration, which could be valuable in all kinds of applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines how explainable AI (XAI) can impact task performance and other outcomes in human-AI collaborative settings. Through a series of experiments, the researchers had participants work with an AI assistant to complete various tasks, comparing conditions where the AI provided explanations for its actions versus when it did not.
The AI assistant was designed to support the participants in their task completion. In the "explainable" condition, the AI would provide information about its reasoning and decision-making process. In the "non-explainable" condition, the AI would simply output recommendations without any additional context.
The results showed that when the AI provided explanations, participants were able to complete the tasks more effectively. They also reported higher levels of trust in the AI system and a better understanding of its capabilities and limitations. These findings suggest that XAI can enhance human-AI collaboration by helping users calibrate their reliance on the AI and make more informed decisions.
The authors discuss how these results relate to prior work on the role of explanation in human-AI interaction and the benefits of integrating domain knowledge into XAI systems. They also consider the potential for user interaction to serve as a form of explanation in future human-AI collaborative systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides compelling evidence that explainable AI can lead to improved task performance and better human-AI collaboration. However, it is important to note some potential limitations and areas for further research.
The experiments were conducted in a relatively controlled lab setting, so it remains to be seen how the findings would translate to more complex, real-world scenarios. Additionally, the tasks involved were relatively straightforward, so the benefits of XAI may be more pronounced for more challenging or ambiguous problems.
The study also did not explore how individual differences in users' technical expertise, cognitive styles, or other factors might influence the effectiveness of XAI. Understanding these moderating variables could help optimize the design and deployment of XAI systems.
Finally, while the paper highlights the value of explanation, it does not delve into the details of what makes explanations effective. Further research is needed to understand the specific explanation characteristics (e.g., level of detail, framing, interactivity) that best support human-AI collaboration.
Despite these caveats, this work represents an important step forward in understanding how to build AI systems that can work seamlessly alongside humans. Continued advancements in XAI have the potential to unlock new levels of human-machine collaboration and problem-solving.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates that explainable AI (XAI) can enhance task performance and improve human-AI collaboration. By providing explanations for its actions, an AI assistant was able to help users complete tasks more effectively, increase their trust in the system, and better understand its capabilities and limitations.
These findings suggest that making AI systems more transparent and interpretable could be a valuable strategy for unlocking the full potential of human-AI teamwork. As AI becomes more prevalent in various domains, fostering effective collaboration between humans and machines will be essential. The insights from this research could help guide the development of future XAI systems that can seamlessly integrate with and support human decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
The future of human-centric eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is not post-hoc explanations
Vinitra Swamy, Jibril Frej, Tanja Kaser
0
0
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) plays a crucial role in enabling human understanding and trust in deep learning systems. As models get larger, more ubiquitous, and pervasive in aspects of daily life, explainability is necessary to minimize adverse effects of model mistakes. Unfortunately, current approaches in human-centric XAI (e.g. predictive tasks in healthcare, education, or personalized ads) tend to rely on a single post-hoc explainer, whereas recent work has identified systematic disagreement between post-hoc explainers when applied to the same instances of underlying black-box models. In this paper, we therefore present a call for action to address the limitations of current state-of-the-art explainers. We propose a shift from post-hoc explainability to designing interpretable neural network architectures. We identify five needs of human-centric XAI (real-time, accurate, actionable, human-interpretable, and consistent) and propose two schemes for interpretable-by-design neural network workflows (adaptive routing with InterpretCC and temporal diagnostics with I2MD). We postulate that the future of human-centric XAI is neither in explaining black-boxes nor in reverting to traditional, interpretable models, but in neural networks that are intrinsically interpretable.
5/29/2024
Unraveling the Dilemma of AI Errors: Exploring the Effectiveness of Human and Machine Explanations for Large Language Models
Marvin Pafla, Kate Larson, Mark Hancock
0
0
The field of eXplainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has produced a plethora of methods (e.g., saliency-maps) to gain insight into artificial intelligence (AI) models, and has exploded with the rise of deep learning (DL). However, human-participant studies question the efficacy of these methods, particularly when the AI output is wrong. In this study, we collected and analyzed 156 human-generated text and saliency-based explanations collected in a question-answering task (N=40) and compared them empirically to state-of-the-art XAI explanations (integrated gradients, conservative LRP, and ChatGPT) in a human-participant study (N=136). Our findings show that participants found human saliency maps to be more helpful in explaining AI answers than machine saliency maps, but performance negatively correlated with trust in the AI model and explanations. This finding hints at the dilemma of AI errors in explanation, where helpful explanations can lead to lower task performance when they support wrong AI predictions.
4/12/2024
Transferring Domain Knowledge with (X)AI-Based Learning Systems
Philipp Spitzer, Niklas Kuhl, Marc Goutier, Manuel Kaschura, Gerhard Satzger
0
0
In numerous high-stakes domains, training novices via conventional learning systems does not suffice. To impart tacit knowledge, experts' hands-on guidance is imperative. However, training novices by experts is costly and time-consuming, increasing the need for alternatives. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) has conventionally been used to make black-box artificial intelligence systems interpretable. In this work, we utilize XAI as an alternative: An (X)AI system is trained on experts' past decisions and is then employed to teach novices by providing examples coupled with explanations. In a study with 249 participants, we measure the effectiveness of such an approach for a classification task. We show that (X)AI-based learning systems are able to induce learning in novices and that their cognitive styles moderate learning. Thus, we take the first steps to reveal the impact of XAI on human learning and point AI developers to future options to tailor the design of (X)AI-based learning systems.
6/4/2024
Explainable Interface for Human-Autonomy Teaming: A Survey
Xiangqi Kong, Yang Xing, Antonios Tsourdos, Ziyue Wang, Weisi Guo, Adolfo Perrusquia, Andreas Wikander
0
0
Nowadays, large-scale foundation models are being increasingly integrated into numerous safety-critical applications, including human-autonomy teaming (HAT) within transportation, medical, and defence domains. Consequently, the inherent 'black-box' nature of these sophisticated deep neural networks heightens the significance of fostering mutual understanding and trust between humans and autonomous systems. To tackle the transparency challenges in HAT, this paper conducts a thoughtful study on the underexplored domain of Explainable Interface (EI) in HAT systems from a human-centric perspective, thereby enriching the existing body of research in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). We explore the design, development, and evaluation of EI within XAI-enhanced HAT systems. To do so, we first clarify the distinctions between these concepts: EI, explanations and model explainability, aiming to provide researchers and practitioners with a structured understanding. Second, we contribute to a novel framework for EI, addressing the unique challenges in HAT. Last, our summarized evaluation framework for ongoing EI offers a holistic perspective, encompassing model performance, human-centered factors, and group task objectives. Based on extensive surveys across XAI, HAT, psychology, and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), this review offers multiple novel insights into incorporating XAI into HAT systems and outlines future directions.
5/7/2024