Detecting Generated Native Ads in Conversational Search
2402.04889
0
0
📊
Abstract
Conversational search engines such as YouChat and Microsoft Copilot use large language models (LLMs) to generate responses to queries. It is only a small step to also let the same technology insert ads within the generated responses - instead of separately placing ads next to a response. Inserted ads would be reminiscent of native advertising and product placement, both of which are very effective forms of subtle and manipulative advertising. Considering the high computational costs associated with LLMs, for which providers need to develop sustainable business models, users of conversational search engines may very well be confronted with generated native ads in the near future. In this paper, we thus take a first step to investigate whether LLMs can also be used as a countermeasure, i.e., to block generated native ads. We compile the Webis Generated Native Ads 2024 dataset of queries and generated responses with automatically inserted ads, and evaluate whether LLMs or fine-tuned sentence transformers can detect the ads. In our experiments, the investigated LLMs struggle with the task but sentence transformers achieve precision and recall values above 0.9.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Conversational search engines like YouChat and Microsoft Copilot use large language models (LLMs) to generate responses to queries.
- It's possible for these LLMs to also insert ads within the generated responses, similar to native advertising and product placement.
- Given the high computational costs of LLMs, providers may start incorporating these "generated native ads" to develop sustainable business models.
- This paper investigates whether LLMs or fine-tuned sentence transformers can be used to detect and block these generated native ads.
Plain English Explanation
Conversational search engines use advanced AI models called large language models (LLMs) to understand and respond to user queries. These LLMs are very powerful, but also computationally expensive for the companies that run them.
One potential way for these companies to make money and keep their services running is to insert advertisements directly into the responses generated by the LLMs. This would be similar to "native advertising" or "product placement" where the ads are seamlessly integrated into the content, making them more subtle and persuasive.
The researchers in this paper wanted to see if the same LLM technology could be used to detect and block these generated native ads, before they are shown to users. They created a dataset of sample queries and responses with inserted ads, and then tested different AI models to see how well they could identify the ads.
The results showed that the LLMs themselves struggled to reliably detect the ads, but specialized "sentence transformer" models were able to achieve very high accuracy, identifying the ads with over 90% precision and recall. This suggests that there may be ways to build ad-blocking capabilities directly into conversational search engines, to protect users from manipulative advertising.
Technical Explanation
The researchers compiled the Webis Generated Native Ads 2024 dataset, which contains sample queries and the responses generated by LLMs, with ads automatically inserted. They then evaluated the performance of both LLMs and fine-tuned sentence transformers in detecting these inserted ads.
In their experiments, the LLMs struggled to reliably identify the generated native ads, likely due to the subtle and contextual nature of the ads. However, the sentence transformer models, which are specialized for understanding and comparing text, were able to achieve precision and recall values above 0.9 in detecting the ads.
This suggests that while LLMs themselves may not be well-suited for this task, other AI architectures like sentence transformers could potentially be used as a countermeasure to block generated native ads in conversational search engines. By detecting and removing these ads, the technology could help protect users from manipulative advertising techniques and preserve the integrity of the search experience.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable first step in exploring the potential challenges and countermeasures related to generated native ads in conversational search. However, the research is limited in scope and raises several important questions for further investigation.
The dataset used is relatively small and may not capture the full range of ad insertion techniques that LLMs could employ. Additionally, the paper does not address the broader ethical and societal implications of using LLMs to generate misinformation or manipulative content.
There are also concerns about the potential for adversarial attacks that could allow ads to evade detection, as well as questions about the scalability and computational overhead of the proposed sentence transformer-based countermeasures.
Overall, this research highlights the need for continued vigilance and innovation in developing robust safeguards against the misuse of powerful language models, to ensure they serve the best interests of users and society.
Conclusion
This paper takes an important first step in exploring the use of large language models (LLMs) to detect and block generated native ads in conversational search engines. While the LLMs themselves struggled with this task, the researchers found that fine-tuned sentence transformers could achieve high accuracy in identifying the inserted ads.
This suggests that there may be viable technical solutions to protect users from manipulative advertising in conversational search, though further research is needed to address the broader challenges and implications. As conversational AI continues to evolve, it will be crucial to develop effective countermeasures to preserve the integrity and trust of these vital technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Ranking Manipulation for Conversational Search Engines
Samuel Pfrommer, Yatong Bai, Tanmay Gautam, Somayeh Sojoudi
0
0
Major search engine providers are rapidly incorporating Large Language Model (LLM)-generated content in response to user queries. These conversational search engines operate by loading retrieved website text into the LLM context for summarization and interpretation. Recent research demonstrates that LLMs are highly vulnerable to jailbreaking and prompt injection attacks, which disrupt the safety and quality goals of LLMs using adversarial strings. This work investigates the impact of prompt injections on the ranking order of sources referenced by conversational search engines. To this end, we introduce a focused dataset of real-world consumer product websites and formalize conversational search ranking as an adversarial problem. Experimentally, we analyze conversational search rankings in the absence of adversarial injections and show that different LLMs vary significantly in prioritizing product name, document content, and context position. We then present a tree-of-attacks-based jailbreaking technique which reliably promotes low-ranked products. Importantly, these attacks transfer effectively to state-of-the-art conversational search engines such as perplexity.ai. Given the strong financial incentive for website owners to boost their search ranking, we argue that our problem formulation is of critical importance for future robustness work.
6/14/2024
Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?
Canyu Chen, Kai Shu
0
0
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has made a transformative impact. However, the potential that LLMs such as ChatGPT can be exploited to generate misinformation has posed a serious concern to online safety and public trust. A fundamental research question is: will LLM-generated misinformation cause more harm than human-written misinformation? We propose to tackle this question from the perspective of detection difficulty. We first build a taxonomy of LLM-generated misinformation. Then we categorize and validate the potential real-world methods for generating misinformation with LLMs. Then, through extensive empirical investigation, we discover that LLM-generated misinformation can be harder to detect for humans and detectors compared to human-written misinformation with the same semantics, which suggests it can have more deceptive styles and potentially cause more harm. We also discuss the implications of our discovery on combating misinformation in the age of LLMs and the countermeasures.
4/16/2024
🤔
Online Advertisements with LLMs: Opportunities and Challenges
Soheil Feizi, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Keivan Rezaei, Suho Shin
0
0
This paper explores the potential for leveraging Large Language Models (LLM) in the realm of online advertising systems. We delve into essential requirements including privacy, latency, reliability as well as the satisfaction of users and advertisers that such a system must fulfill. We further introduce a general framework for LLM advertisement, consisting of modification, bidding, prediction, and auction modules. Different design considerations for each module are presented. Fundamental questions regarding practicality, efficiency, and implementation challenges of these designs are raised for future research. Finally, we explore the prospect of LLM-based dynamic creative optimization as a means to significantly enhance the appeal of advertisements to users and discuss its additional challenges.
4/19/2024
💬
Improving the Capabilities of Large Language Model Based Marketing Analytics Copilots With Semantic Search And Fine-Tuning
Yilin Gao, Sai Kumar Arava, Yancheng Li, James W. Snyder Jr
0
0
Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely deployed to solve problems related to marketing attribution and budget optimization. However, AI models can be quite complex, and it can be difficult to understand model workings and insights without extensive implementation teams. In principle, recently developed large language models (LLMs), like GPT-4, can be deployed to provide marketing insights, reducing the time and effort required to make critical decisions. In practice, there are substantial challenges that need to be overcome to reliably use such models. We focus on domain-specific question-answering, SQL generation needed for data retrieval, and tabular analysis and show how a combination of semantic search, prompt engineering, and fine-tuning can be applied to dramatically improve the ability of LLMs to execute these tasks accurately. We compare both proprietary models, like GPT-4, and open-source models, like Llama-2-70b, as well as various embedding methods. These models are tested on sample use cases specific to marketing mix modeling and attribution.
4/23/2024