Detection of Unknown Errors in Human-Centered Systems

Read original: arXiv:2407.19569 - Published 7/30/2024 by Aranyak Maity, Ayan Banerjee, Sandeep Gupta
Total Score

0

Detection of Unknown Errors in Human-Centered Systems

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a method for detecting unknown errors in human-centered systems.
  • The proposed approach combines physical simulations and machine learning to identify potential issues that may arise in complex, dynamic environments.
  • The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their method on a case study involving a human-robot interaction scenario.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a way to find problems in systems that involve humans working with machines or technology. These kinds of "human-centered systems" can be very complex, with many moving parts that interact in unpredictable ways. That makes it hard to anticipate all the things that could go wrong.

To address this challenge, the researchers combine two powerful techniques:

  1. Physics-based simulations - They create detailed computer models of the system, based on the underlying physics and mechanics. This allows them to simulate how the system would behave in different situations, including rare or unexpected scenarios.

  2. Machine learning - They train AI models to analyze the simulation data and learn to recognize patterns of problematic behavior. This "surrogate model" can then be used to quickly identify potential issues, without having to run the full simulations every time.

By integrating these approaches, the researchers developed a method that can detect unknown errors - problems that weren't anticipated or accounted for in the original system design. This is a crucial capability, as unexpected failures can be dangerous or costly in many human-centered applications, like self-driving cars, industrial robotics, or medical devices.

The researchers demonstrate their technique on a case study involving a human interacting with a robot. They show how the combined simulation-ML approach can successfully identify potential safety issues that might arise in this complex, dynamic scenario.

Technical Explanation

The core of the researchers' approach is a physics-based surrogate model - a machine learning model that acts as a stand-in for the full physical simulation of the human-centered system.

First, the researchers create a high-fidelity simulation of the system, modeling the relevant physical dynamics, environmental factors, and human behaviors. This simulation serves as a "digital twin" of the real-world system.

Next, they use this simulation to generate a large dataset of possible system states and trajectories. This includes both normal operating conditions as well as rare or anomalous situations that could lead to errors or failures.

They then train a neural network-based surrogate model to learn the mapping between the system's inputs, states, and potential error outputs. This surrogate can quickly predict the likelihood of errors without having to run the full, computationally expensive simulation.

Finally, the researchers deploy this surrogate model to actively monitor the real-world system for potential issues. If the model detects an elevated risk of an unknown error, it can trigger alerts or interventions to mitigate the problem.

The key advantage of this approach is that it allows the detection of unknown unknowns - potential failures that were not foreseen or accounted for in the original system design. By leveraging the simulation's comprehensive coverage of the state space, the surrogate model can identify subtle patterns that may indicate impending problems, even if those problems were not explicitly modeled.

The researchers validate their method on a human-robot interaction case study, demonstrating its ability to accurately predict safety hazards that arise from complex, dynamic human behaviors.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their approach:

  • The simulation model must be a sufficiently accurate representation of the real-world system, which can be challenging to achieve, especially for complex, human-centered scenarios.
  • The training dataset generated from the simulation may not fully capture the breadth of possible real-world situations, leading to blind spots in the surrogate model's coverage.
  • The researchers only evaluate their method on a single case study; more extensive testing across diverse human-centered systems would be needed to fully assess its generalizability.

Additionally, one could question whether the proactive, simulation-based approach is overkill for some applications. In less critical or less complex systems, a more reactive, data-driven anomaly detection strategy may be sufficient.

Further research could also explore ways to make the surrogate model more interpretable, so that the underlying causes of predicted errors are more transparent to human operators and designers.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach for detecting unknown errors in human-centered systems, a crucial capability for ensuring the safety and reliability of complex, dynamic technologies that interact with humans.

By combining physics-based simulations and machine learning, the researchers developed a "surrogate model" that can efficiently identify potential issues without having to run the full, computationally intensive simulations repeatedly.

While the method has some limitations, it represents an important step forward in proactively addressing the challenge of unknown unknowns in human-centered systems. As these technologies become more prevalent in our lives, the ability to anticipate and mitigate unexpected failures will only grow in importance.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Detection of Unknown Errors in Human-Centered Systems
Total Score

0

Detection of Unknown Errors in Human-Centered Systems

Aranyak Maity, Ayan Banerjee, Sandeep Gupta

Artificial Intelligence-enabled systems are increasingly being deployed in real-world safety-critical settings involving human participants. It is vital to ensure the safety of such systems and stop the evolution of the system with error before causing harm to human participants. We propose a model-agnostic approach to detecting unknown errors in such human-centered systems without requiring any knowledge about the error signatures. Our approach employs dynamics-induced hybrid recurrent neural networks (DiH-RNN) for constructing physics-based models from operational data, coupled with conformal inference for assessing errors in the underlying model caused by violations of physical laws, thereby facilitating early detection of unknown errors before unsafe shifts in operational data distribution occur. We evaluate our framework on multiple real-world safety critical systems and show that our technique outperforms the existing state-of-the-art in detecting unknown errors.

Read more

7/30/2024

Providing Safety Assurances for Systems with Unknown Dynamics
Total Score

0

Providing Safety Assurances for Systems with Unknown Dynamics

Hao Wang, Javier Borquez, Somil Bansal

As autonomous systems become more complex and integral in our society, the need to accurately model and safely control these systems has increased significantly. In the past decade, there has been tremendous success in using deep learning techniques to model and control systems that are difficult to model using first principles. However, providing safety assurances for such systems remains difficult, partially due to the uncertainty in the learned model. In this work, we aim to provide safety assurances for systems whose dynamics are not readily derived from first principles and, hence, are more advantageous to be learned using deep learning techniques. Given the system of interest and safety constraints, we learn an ensemble model of the system dynamics from data. Leveraging ensemble uncertainty as a measure of uncertainty in the learned dynamics model, we compute a maximal robust control invariant set, starting from which the system is guaranteed to satisfy the safety constraints under the condition that realized model uncertainties are contained in the predefined set of admissible model uncertainty. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method using a simulated case study with an inverted pendulum and a hardware experiment with a TurtleBot. The experiments show that our method robustifies the control actions of the system against model uncertainty and generates safe behaviors without being overly restrictive. The codes and accompanying videos can be found on the project website.

Read more

9/10/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

ERR@HRI 2024 Challenge: Multimodal Detection of Errors and Failures in Human-Robot Interactions

Micol Spitale, Maria Teresa Parreira, Maia Stiber, Minja Axelsson, Neval Kara, Garima Kankariya, Chien-Ming Huang, Malte Jung, Wendy Ju, Hatice Gunes

Despite the recent advancements in robotics and machine learning (ML), the deployment of autonomous robots in our everyday lives is still an open challenge. This is due to multiple reasons among which are their frequent mistakes, such as interrupting people or having delayed responses, as well as their limited ability to understand human speech, i.e., failure in tasks like transcribing speech to text. These mistakes may disrupt interactions and negatively influence human perception of these robots. To address this problem, robots need to have the ability to detect human-robot interaction (HRI) failures. The ERR@HRI 2024 challenge tackles this by offering a benchmark multimodal dataset of robot failures during human-robot interactions (HRI), encouraging researchers to develop and benchmark multimodal machine learning models to detect these failures. We created a dataset featuring multimodal non-verbal interaction data, including facial, speech, and pose features from video clips of interactions with a robotic coach, annotated with labels indicating the presence or absence of robot mistakes, user awkwardness, and interaction ruptures, allowing for the training and evaluation of predictive models. Challenge participants have been invited to submit their multimodal ML models for detection of robot errors and to be evaluated against various performance metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, with and without a margin of error reflecting the time-sensitivity of these metrics. The results of this challenge will help the research field in better understanding the robot failures in human-robot interactions and designing autonomous robots that can mitigate their own errors after successfully detecting them.

Read more

7/9/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Using Social Cues to Recognize Task Failures for HRI: Framework, Overview, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions

Alexandra Bremers, Alexandria Pabst, Maria Teresa Parreira, Wendy Ju

Robots that carry out tasks and interact in complex environments will inevitably commit errors. Error detection is thus an essential ability for robots to master to work efficiently and productively. People can leverage social feedback to get an indication of whether an action was successful or not. With advances in computing and artificial intelligence (AI), it is increasingly possible for robots to achieve a similar capability of collecting social feedback. In this work, we take this one step further and propose a framework for how social cues can be used as feedback signals to recognize task failures for human-robot interaction (HRI). Our proposed framework sets out a research agenda based on insights from the literature on behavioral science, human-robot interaction, and machine learning to focus on three areas: 1) social cues as feedback (from behavioral science), 2) recognizing task failures in robots (from HRI), and 3) approaches for autonomous detection of HRI task failures based on social cues (from machine learning). We propose a taxonomy of error detection based on self-awareness and social feedback. Finally, we provide recommendations for HRI researchers and practitioners interested in developing robots that detect task errors using human social cues. This article is intended for interdisciplinary HRI researchers and practitioners, where the third theme of our analysis provides more technical details aiming toward the practical implementation of these systems.

Read more

5/30/2024