DevBench: A multimodal developmental benchmark for language learning
2406.10215
0
0
Abstract
How (dis)similar are the learning trajectories of vision-language models and children? Recent modeling work has attempted to understand the gap between models' and humans' data efficiency by constructing models trained on less data, especially multimodal naturalistic data. However, such models are often evaluated on adult-level benchmarks, with limited breadth in language abilities tested, and without direct comparison to behavioral data. We introduce DevBench, a multimodal benchmark comprising seven language evaluation tasks spanning the domains of lexical, syntactic, and semantic ability, with behavioral data from both children and adults. We evaluate a set of vision-language models on these tasks, comparing models and humans not only on accuracy but on their response patterns. Across tasks, models exhibit variation in their closeness to human response patterns, and models that perform better on a task also more closely resemble human behavioral responses. We also examine the developmental trajectory of OpenCLIP over training, finding that greater training results in closer approximations to adult response patterns. DevBench thus provides a benchmark for comparing models to human language development. These comparisons highlight ways in which model and human language learning processes diverge, providing insight into entry points for improving language models.
Create account to get full access
Overview
ā¢ This paper introduces DevBench, a new multimodal developmental benchmark for evaluating language learning systems. ā¢ DevBench aims to assess how well language models can learn and adapt over time, simulating the gradual learning process of human children. ā¢ The benchmark includes a diverse set of tasks spanning language, vision, and reasoning, designed to test a model's ability to acquire and apply knowledge in a progressive manner.
Plain English Explanation
DevBench: A multimodal developmental benchmark for language learning is a new evaluation framework for assessing how well language models can learn and adapt over time, similar to how human children gradually acquire knowledge. Rather than testing a model's performance on a fixed set of tasks, DevBench simulates a developmental learning process by introducing new challenges incrementally.
The benchmark includes a wide range of tasks that require understanding language, processing visual information, and reasoning about the world. By exposing models to this diverse set of capabilities, DevBench aims to measure how effectively they can acquire and apply knowledge in a progressive manner, mimicking the way humans learn.
This approach is distinct from traditional benchmarks that evaluate a model's performance on a static set of tasks. DevBench is designed to better reflect the dynamic and gradual nature of human learning, providing a more comprehensive evaluation of a language model's abilities.
Technical Explanation
DevBench: A multimodal developmental benchmark for language learning introduces a new evaluation framework that assesses how language models can learn and adapt over time, rather than just measuring their performance on a fixed set of tasks.
The benchmark consists of a diverse set of tasks spanning language, vision, and reasoning, which are presented to models in a progressive manner. This simulates the gradual learning process of human children, where new skills and knowledge are acquired incrementally.
The tasks in DevBench are organized into stages, with each stage introducing new challenges that build upon the previous ones. This structure allows the benchmark to measure how effectively a model can acquire and apply knowledge over time, rather than just its performance on a static set of capabilities.
By evaluating models on this more dynamic and comprehensive set of abilities, DevBench aims to provide a more realistic assessment of their language learning potential, going beyond traditional benchmarks that focus on isolated task performance.
Critical Analysis
The DevBench: A multimodal developmental benchmark for language learning approach offers a novel and promising way to evaluate language models, but it also faces some potential challenges.
One concern is the complexity of designing and implementing the staged learning process, as it requires carefully crafting a sequence of tasks that build upon each other in a meaningful way. Ensuring that each stage presents an appropriate level of difficulty and that the transitions between stages are smooth could be a significant technical challenge.
Additionally, the diverse set of tasks included in DevBench may make it difficult to isolate and understand the specific capabilities that a model has acquired. The benchmark's holistic approach could make it challenging to pinpoint areas of strength or weakness, which could limit its usefulness for guiding model development and improvement.
Another potential limitation is the scalability of the benchmark, as the number of tasks and stages required to capture the full breadth of human learning may become unwieldy as the benchmark evolves. Maintaining the benchmark's consistency and relevance over time could also be a concern.
Despite these potential issues, the DevBench: A multimodal developmental benchmark for language learning approach represents an important step forward in evaluating language models in a more holistic and realistic manner. Continued research and refinement of the benchmark may help to address these challenges and provide valuable insights into the language learning capabilities of AI systems.
Conclusion
DevBench: A multimodal developmental benchmark for language learning offers a novel approach to evaluating language models by simulating the gradual learning process of human children. By presenting models with a diverse set of tasks in a progressive manner, the benchmark aims to measure how effectively they can acquire and apply knowledge over time, rather than just their performance on a fixed set of capabilities.
This more comprehensive and dynamic evaluation approach has the potential to provide valuable insights into the language learning potential of AI systems, going beyond the limitations of traditional benchmarks. While the implementation of DevBench may face some challenges, the continued development and refinement of this benchmark could lead to significant advancements in the field of language learning and understanding.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?
Yuan Liu, Haodong Duan, Yuanhan Zhang, Bo Li, Songyang Zhang, Wangbo Zhao, Yike Yuan, Jiaqi Wang, Conghui He, Ziwei Liu, Kai Chen, Dahua Lin
0
0
Large vision-language models have recently achieved remarkable progress, exhibiting great perception and reasoning abilities concerning visual information. However, how to effectively evaluate these large vision-language models remains a major obstacle, hindering future model development. Traditional benchmarks like VQAv2 or COCO Caption provide quantitative performance measurements but suffer from a lack of fine-grained ability assessment and non-robust evaluation metrics. Recent subjective benchmarks, such as OwlEval, offer comprehensive evaluations of a model's abilities by incorporating human labor, but they are not scalable and display significant bias. In response to these challenges, we propose MMBench, a novel multi-modality benchmark. MMBench methodically develops a comprehensive evaluation pipeline, primarily comprised of two elements. The first element is a meticulously curated dataset that surpasses existing similar benchmarks in terms of the number and variety of evaluation questions and abilities. The second element introduces a novel CircularEval strategy and incorporates the use of ChatGPT. This implementation is designed to convert free-form predictions into pre-defined choices, thereby facilitating a more robust evaluation of the model's predictions. MMBench is a systematically-designed objective benchmark for robustly evaluating the various abilities of vision-language models. We hope MMBench will assist the research community in better evaluating their models and encourage future advancements in this domain. Project page: https://opencompass.org.cn/mmbench.
4/30/2024
MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark
Kunchang Li, Yali Wang, Yinan He, Yizhuo Li, Yi Wang, Yi Liu, Zun Wang, Jilan Xu, Guo Chen, Ping Luo, Limin Wang, Yu Qiao
0
0
With the rapid development of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), a number of diagnostic benchmarks have recently emerged to evaluate the comprehension capabilities of these models. However, most benchmarks predominantly assess spatial understanding in the static image tasks, while overlooking temporal understanding in the dynamic video tasks. To alleviate this issue, we introduce a comprehensive Multi-modal Video understanding Benchmark, namely MVBench, which covers 20 challenging video tasks that cannot be effectively solved with a single frame. Specifically, we first introduce a novel static-to-dynamic method to define these temporal-related tasks. By transforming various static tasks into dynamic ones, we enable the systematic generation of video tasks that require a broad spectrum of temporal skills, ranging from perception to cognition. Then, guided by the task definition, we automatically convert public video annotations into multiple-choice QA to evaluate each task. On one hand, such a distinct paradigm allows us to build MVBench efficiently, without much manual intervention. On the other hand, it guarantees evaluation fairness with ground-truth video annotations, avoiding the biased scoring of LLMs. Moreover, we further develop a robust video MLLM baseline, i.e., VideoChat2, by progressive multi-modal training with diverse instruction-tuning data. The extensive results on our MVBench reveal that, the existing MLLMs are far from satisfactory in temporal understanding, while our VideoChat2 largely surpasses these leading models by over 15% on MVBench. All models and data are available at https://github.com/OpenGVLab/Ask-Anything.
5/24/2024
Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models' Understanding of Real-World Complexities Through Synthetic Benchmarks
Haokun Zhou, Yipeng Hong
0
0
This study assesses the ability of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) to differentiate between AI-generated and human-generated images. It introduces a new automated benchmark construction method for this evaluation. The experiment compared common LVLMs with human participants using a mixed dataset of AI and human-created images. Results showed that LVLMs could distinguish between the image types to some extent but exhibited a rightward bias, and perform significantly worse compared to humans. To build on these findings, we developed an automated benchmark construction process using AI. This process involved topic retrieval, narrative script generation, error embedding, and image generation, creating a diverse set of text-image pairs with intentional errors. We validated our method through constructing two caparable benchmarks. This study highlights the strengths and weaknesses of LVLMs in real-world understanding and advances benchmark construction techniques, providing a scalable and automatic approach for AI model evaluation.
6/14/2024
VisualWebBench: How Far Have Multimodal LLMs Evolved in Web Page Understanding and Grounding?
Junpeng Liu, Yifan Song, Bill Yuchen Lin, Wai Lam, Graham Neubig, Yuanzhi Li, Xiang Yue
0
0
Multimodal Large Language models (MLLMs) have shown promise in web-related tasks, but evaluating their performance in the web domain remains a challenge due to the lack of comprehensive benchmarks. Existing benchmarks are either designed for general multimodal tasks, failing to capture the unique characteristics of web pages, or focus on end-to-end web agent tasks, unable to measure fine-grained abilities such as OCR, understanding, and grounding. In this paper, we introduce bench{}, a multimodal benchmark designed to assess the capabilities of MLLMs across a variety of web tasks. bench{} consists of seven tasks, and comprises 1.5K human-curated instances from 139 real websites, covering 87 sub-domains. We evaluate 14 open-source MLLMs, Gemini Pro, Claude-3 series, and GPT-4V(ision) on bench{}, revealing significant challenges and performance gaps. Further analysis highlights the limitations of current MLLMs, including inadequate grounding in text-rich environments and subpar performance with low-resolution image inputs. We believe bench{} will serve as a valuable resource for the research community and contribute to the creation of more powerful and versatile MLLMs for web-related applications.
4/10/2024