Development of a Dual-Input Neural Model for Detecting AI-Generated Imagery
2406.13688
0
0
Abstract
Over the past years, images generated by artificial intelligence have become more prevalent and more realistic. Their advent raises ethical questions relating to misinformation, artistic expression, and identity theft, among others. The crux of many of these moral questions is the difficulty in distinguishing between real and fake images. It is important to develop tools that are able to detect AI-generated images, especially when these images are too realistic-looking for the human eye to identify as fake. This paper proposes a dual-branch neural network architecture that takes both images and their Fourier frequency decomposition as inputs. We use standard CNN-based methods for both branches as described in Stuchi et al. [7], followed by fully-connected layers. Our proposed model achieves an accuracy of 94% on the CIFAKE dataset, which significantly outperforms classic ML methods and CNNs, achieving performance comparable to some state-of-the-art architectures, such as ResNet.
Create account to get full access
Overview
ā¢ This paper proposes a dual-input neural network model for detecting AI-generated imagery, which combines visual and metadata features to improve detection accuracy. ā¢ The model leverages both the image content and associated metadata (e.g., EXIF data) to make more informed predictions about whether an image was created by AI or captured by a human. ā¢ This approach aims to address limitations of existing methods that rely solely on analyzing the visual content of images.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers developed a new AI system that can better detect whether an image was created by a computer or captured by a person. Existing methods for detecting AI-generated images often focus only on analyzing the visual features of the image itself. However, the researchers hypothesized that incorporating additional information, such as the metadata associated with the image (e.g., camera settings, location data), could improve the system's ability to distinguish between human-captured and AI-generated imagery.
To test this, the researchers created a dual-input neural network model. This means the model takes in two different types of information - the image itself and the metadata associated with that image. By considering both the visual content and the contextual metadata, the model can make more accurate predictions about whether the image was created by AI or a human photographer.
The key idea is that AI-generated images may exhibit subtle differences in their visual characteristics or metadata compared to real photographs, and combining these signals can help the model better identify AI-generated content. This could be useful for applications like detecting AI-generated art, distinguishing deepfakes from natural images, or finding AI-generated faces in the wild.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed a dual-input neural network model that takes both the image content and associated metadata as inputs. The image input is processed through a convolutional neural network (CNN) to extract visual features, while the metadata input is processed through a multilayer perceptron (MLP) to extract contextual features.
The outputs of the CNN and MLP are then concatenated and passed through additional fully connected layers to make the final prediction of whether the image is AI-generated or human-captured. This allows the model to learn and leverage the complex relationships between the visual and metadata features to improve detection accuracy.
The researchers evaluated their model on several benchmark datasets for AI-generated image detection, including FFHQ and FakeMTR. They found that the dual-input model outperformed existing single-input approaches, demonstrating the value of incorporating both visual and metadata features for this task.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for improving the detection of AI-generated imagery by leveraging both visual and contextual information. However, the researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:
- The model's performance may be sensitive to the quality and availability of metadata, which can be inconsistent or missing in real-world scenarios.
- The study was conducted on a relatively limited set of datasets, and the researchers suggest testing the model's generalization to a wider range of AI-generated content.
- The specific neural network architecture and training procedures used in the model were not extensively explored, and there may be opportunities to further optimize the model design.
Additionally, one could question the long-term viability of this approach, as AI systems may become increasingly adept at generating realistic metadata to evade detection. Continued research and development in this area will be necessary to stay ahead of the evolving capabilities of AI-generated content creation.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel dual-input neural network model that combines visual and metadata features to improve the detection of AI-generated imagery. By leveraging both the image content and associated contextual information, the model can make more informed predictions about whether an image was created by AI or captured by a human.
The results demonstrate the value of this approach compared to existing single-input methods, and the researchers suggest several directions for future work to further enhance the model's performance and robustness. As the field of AI-generated content detection continues to advance, techniques that can effectively combine multiple signals and adapt to evolving threats will be increasingly important.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Harnessing Machine Learning for Discerning AI-Generated Synthetic Images
Yuyang Wang, Yizhi Hao, Amando Xu Cong
0
0
In the realm of digital media, the advent of AI-generated synthetic images has introduced significant challenges in distinguishing between real and fabricated visual content. These images, often indistinguishable from authentic ones, pose a threat to the credibility of digital media, with potential implications for disinformation and fraud. Our research addresses this challenge by employing machine learning techniques to discern between AI-generated and genuine images. Central to our approach is the CIFAKE dataset, a comprehensive collection of images labeled as Real and Fake. We refine and adapt advanced deep learning architectures like ResNet, VGGNet, and DenseNet, utilizing transfer learning to enhance their precision in identifying synthetic images. We also compare these with a baseline model comprising a vanilla Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The experimental results were significant, demonstrating that our optimized deep learning models outperform traditional methods, with DenseNet achieving an accuracy of 97.74%. Our application study contributes by applying and optimizing these advanced models for synthetic image detection, conducting a comparative analysis using various metrics, and demonstrating their superior capability in identifying AI-generated images over traditional machine learning techniques. This research not only advances the field of digital media integrity but also sets a foundation for future explorations into the ethical and technical dimensions of AI-generated content in digital media.
5/27/2024
šæ
Parents and Children: Distinguishing Multimodal DeepFakes from Natural Images
Roberto Amoroso, Davide Morelli, Marcella Cornia, Lorenzo Baraldi, Alberto Del Bimbo, Rita Cucchiara
0
0
Recent advancements in diffusion models have enabled the generation of realistic deepfakes from textual prompts in natural language. While these models have numerous benefits across various sectors, they have also raised concerns about the potential misuse of fake images and cast new pressures on fake image detection. In this work, we pioneer a systematic study on deepfake detection generated by state-of-the-art diffusion models. Firstly, we conduct a comprehensive analysis of the performance of contrastive and classification-based visual features, respectively extracted from CLIP-based models and ResNet or ViT-based architectures trained on image classification datasets. Our results demonstrate that fake images share common low-level cues, which render them easily recognizable. Further, we devise a multimodal setting wherein fake images are synthesized by different textual captions, which are used as seeds for a generator. Under this setting, we quantify the performance of fake detection strategies and introduce a contrastive-based disentangling method that lets us analyze the role of the semantics of textual descriptions and low-level perceptual cues. Finally, we release a new dataset, called COCOFake, containing about 1.2M images generated from the original COCO image-caption pairs using two recent text-to-image diffusion models, namely Stable Diffusion v1.4 and v2.0.
5/22/2024
š
Finding AI-Generated Faces in the Wild
Gonzalo J. Aniano Porcile, Jack Gindi, Shivansh Mundra, James R. Verbus, Hany Farid
0
0
AI-based image generation has continued to rapidly improve, producing increasingly more realistic images with fewer obvious visual flaws. AI-generated images are being used to create fake online profiles which in turn are being used for spam, fraud, and disinformation campaigns. As the general problem of detecting any type of manipulated or synthesized content is receiving increasing attention, here we focus on a more narrow task of distinguishing a real face from an AI-generated face. This is particularly applicable when tackling inauthentic online accounts with a fake user profile photo. We show that by focusing on only faces, a more resilient and general-purpose artifact can be detected that allows for the detection of AI-generated faces from a variety of GAN- and diffusion-based synthesis engines, and across image resolutions (as low as 128 x 128 pixels) and qualities.
4/8/2024
š
How to Distinguish AI-Generated Images from Authentic Photographs
Negar Kamali, Karyn Nakamura, Angelos Chatzimparmpas, Jessica Hullman, Matthew Groh
0
0
The high level of photorealism in state-of-the-art diffusion models like Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, and Firefly makes it difficult for untrained humans to distinguish between real photographs and AI-generated images. To address this problem, we designed a guide to help readers develop a more critical eye toward identifying artifacts, inconsistencies, and implausibilities that often appear in AI-generated images. The guide is organized into five categories of artifacts and implausibilities: anatomical, stylistic, functional, violations of physics, and sociocultural. For this guide, we generated 138 images with diffusion models, curated 9 images from social media, and curated 42 real photographs. These images showcase the kinds of cues that prompt suspicion towards the possibility an image is AI-generated and why it is often difficult to draw conclusions about an image's provenance without any context beyond the pixels in an image. Human-perceptible artifacts are not always present in AI-generated images, but this guide reveals artifacts and implausibilities that often emerge. By drawing attention to these kinds of artifacts and implausibilities, we aim to better equip people to distinguish AI-generated images from real photographs in the future.
6/14/2024