The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking
0
🔎
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the security concerns surrounding the use of generative AI models for image production.
- The authors present a dataset called ARIA, which contains over 140,000 real and AI-generated images across various categories.
- They evaluate the ability of both human users and state-of-the-art AI detectors to distinguish real images from those generated by AI.
- Finally, the authors develop a ResNet-50 classifier and assess its accuracy and transferability on the ARIA dataset.
Plain English Explanation
Artificial intelligence (AI) models can now create high-quality images based on text prompts. These AI-generated images can be virtually indistinguishable from real photographs or artwork created by humans. While this technological advance is impressive, it also raises security concerns. These AI-generated images could be used for fraud, the spread of misinformation, or the creation of unauthorized artworks.
To address these concerns, the researchers in this paper have compiled a dataset called ARIA, which contains over 140,000 real and AI-generated images across different categories, such as artwork, social media images, news photos, disaster scenes, and anime pictures. This dataset can be used by other researchers to develop better ways of detecting AI-generated images in the real world.
The researchers also conducted experiments to see how well human users and existing AI detectors can distinguish real images from those created by AI. They found that even with reference images for comparison, humans struggle to reliably identify AI-generated content. Similarly, current AI detectors have difficulty accurately identifying the AI-generated images in the ARIA dataset.
To address this challenge, the researchers developed a new AI-based classifier (a type of machine learning model) called ResNet-50. This classifier was tested on the ARIA dataset and showed promising accuracy in detecting AI-generated images. However, the researchers also noted that the classifier's performance may not transfer well to real-world scenarios, where the AI-generated images could be more advanced or diverse.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this paper present a systematic approach to understanding and detecting AI-generated images, which they refer to as "AI-art." They start by collecting and sharing a dataset of real images and their corresponding AI-generated counterparts. This dataset, named ARIA, contains over 140,000 images across five categories: artworks (paintings), social media images, news photos, disaster scenes, and anime pictures.
The researchers then conduct two main experiments using the ARIA dataset. First, they perform a user study to evaluate whether real-world users can distinguish real images from AI-generated ones, both with and without reference images for comparison. They find that even with reference images, humans struggle to reliably identify AI-generated content.
Next, the researchers evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art open-source and commercial AI image detectors on the ARIA dataset. They find that these existing detectors have difficulty accurately identifying the AI-generated images.
To address these challenges, the researchers develop a ResNet-50 classifier and evaluate its accuracy and transferability on the ARIA dataset. The ResNet-50 model demonstrates promising results in detecting AI-generated images, but the researchers note that its performance may not transfer well to more advanced or diverse AI-generated content in the real world.
Critical Analysis
The researchers in this paper have taken an important step in addressing the security concerns around the use of generative AI models for image production. By compiling the ARIA dataset and making it available to the research community, they have provided a valuable resource for future studies on detecting AI-generated content.
However, the paper also highlights the significant challenges in reliably distinguishing AI-generated images from real ones, both for human users and existing AI detectors. This underscores the need for continued research and development of more sophisticated techniques for identifying AI-generated content.
While the ResNet-50 classifier developed by the researchers shows promise, the authors acknowledge that its performance may not transfer well to more advanced or diverse AI-generated images in the real world. This suggests that further research is needed to develop robust and adaptable detection methods that can keep pace with the rapid advancements in generative AI technology.
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the ongoing effort to address the security risks posed by AI-generated content. By highlighting the current limitations in detecting AI-generated images and providing a valuable dataset for future research, the authors have laid the groundwork for further progress in this critical area.
Conclusion
This paper presents a systematic approach to understanding and detecting AI-generated images, which have become increasingly difficult to distinguish from real images. The researchers have compiled a large dataset of real and AI-generated images, called ARIA, to support future research in this area.
The paper's findings demonstrate the significant challenges in reliably identifying AI-generated content, both for human users and existing AI detectors. While the researchers' ResNet-50 classifier shows promise, its performance limitations suggest that more advanced and adaptable detection methods are needed to keep pace with the rapid advancements in generative AI technology.
Overall, this research highlights the urgent need for continued work in this field to address the security concerns surrounding the use of AI-generated content. By providing a valuable dataset and insights into the current state of the art, this paper lays the groundwork for future researchers and developers to tackle this important challenge.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
0
The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking
Yuying Li, Zeyan Liu, Junyi Zhao, Liangqin Ren, Fengjun Li, Jiebo Luo, Bo Luo
Generative AI models can produce high-quality images based on text prompts. The generated images often appear indistinguishable from images generated by conventional optical photography devices or created by human artists (i.e., real images). While the outstanding performance of such generative models is generally well received, security concerns arise. For instance, such image generators could be used to facilitate fraud or scam schemes, generate and spread misinformation, or produce fabricated artworks. In this paper, we present a systematic attempt at understanding and detecting AI-generated images (AI-art) in adversarial scenarios. First, we collect and share a dataset of real images and their corresponding artificial counterparts generated by four popular AI image generators. The dataset, named ARIA, contains over 140K images in five categories: artworks (painting), social media images, news photos, disaster scenes, and anime pictures. This dataset can be used as a foundation to support future research on adversarial AI-art. Next, we present a user study that employs the ARIA dataset to evaluate if real-world users can distinguish with or without reference images. In a benchmarking study, we further evaluate if state-of-the-art open-source and commercial AI image detectors can effectively identify the images in the ARIA dataset. Finally, we present a ResNet-50 classifier and evaluate its accuracy and transferability on the ARIA dataset.
Read more4/24/2024
0
Organic or Diffused: Can We Distinguish Human Art from AI-generated Images?
Anna Yoo Jeong Ha, Josephine Passananti, Ronik Bhaskar, Shawn Shan, Reid Southen, Haitao Zheng, Ben Y. Zhao
The advent of generative AI images has completely disrupted the art world. Distinguishing AI generated images from human art is a challenging problem whose impact is growing over time. A failure to address this problem allows bad actors to defraud individuals paying a premium for human art and companies whose stated policies forbid AI imagery. It is also critical for content owners to establish copyright, and for model trainers interested in curating training data in order to avoid potential model collapse. There are several different approaches to distinguishing human art from AI images, including classifiers trained by supervised learning, research tools targeting diffusion models, and identification by professional artists using their knowledge of artistic techniques. In this paper, we seek to understand how well these approaches can perform against today's modern generative models in both benign and adversarial settings. We curate real human art across 7 styles, generate matching images from 5 generative models, and apply 8 detectors (5 automated detectors and 3 different human groups including 180 crowdworkers, 4000+ professional artists, and 13 expert artists experienced at detecting AI). Both Hive and expert artists do very well, but make mistakes in different ways (Hive is weaker against adversarial perturbations while Expert artists produce higher false positives). We believe these weaknesses will remain as models continue to evolve, and use our data to demonstrate why a combined team of human and automated detectors provides the best combination of accuracy and robustness.
Read more7/4/2024
0
Harnessing Machine Learning for Discerning AI-Generated Synthetic Images
Yuyang Wang, Yizhi Hao, Amando Xu Cong
In the realm of digital media, the advent of AI-generated synthetic images has introduced significant challenges in distinguishing between real and fabricated visual content. These images, often indistinguishable from authentic ones, pose a threat to the credibility of digital media, with potential implications for disinformation and fraud. Our research addresses this challenge by employing machine learning techniques to discern between AI-generated and genuine images. Central to our approach is the CIFAKE dataset, a comprehensive collection of images labeled as Real and Fake. We refine and adapt advanced deep learning architectures like ResNet, VGGNet, and DenseNet, utilizing transfer learning to enhance their precision in identifying synthetic images. We also compare these with a baseline model comprising a vanilla Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The experimental results were significant, demonstrating that our optimized deep learning models outperform traditional methods, with DenseNet achieving an accuracy of 97.74%. Our application study contributes by applying and optimizing these advanced models for synthetic image detection, conducting a comparative analysis using various metrics, and demonstrating their superior capability in identifying AI-generated images over traditional machine learning techniques. This research not only advances the field of digital media integrity but also sets a foundation for future explorations into the ethical and technical dimensions of AI-generated content in digital media.
Read more5/27/2024
🔍
0
How to Distinguish AI-Generated Images from Authentic Photographs
Negar Kamali, Karyn Nakamura, Angelos Chatzimparmpas, Jessica Hullman, Matthew Groh
The high level of photorealism in state-of-the-art diffusion models like Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, and Firefly makes it difficult for untrained humans to distinguish between real photographs and AI-generated images. To address this problem, we designed a guide to help readers develop a more critical eye toward identifying artifacts, inconsistencies, and implausibilities that often appear in AI-generated images. The guide is organized into five categories of artifacts and implausibilities: anatomical, stylistic, functional, violations of physics, and sociocultural. For this guide, we generated 138 images with diffusion models, curated 9 images from social media, and curated 42 real photographs. These images showcase the kinds of cues that prompt suspicion towards the possibility an image is AI-generated and why it is often difficult to draw conclusions about an image's provenance without any context beyond the pixels in an image. Human-perceptible artifacts are not always present in AI-generated images, but this guide reveals artifacts and implausibilities that often emerge. By drawing attention to these kinds of artifacts and implausibilities, we aim to better equip people to distinguish AI-generated images from real photographs in the future.
Read more6/14/2024