Finding AI-Generated Faces in the Wild
2311.08577
0
0
🔗
Abstract
AI-based image generation has continued to rapidly improve, producing increasingly more realistic images with fewer obvious visual flaws. AI-generated images are being used to create fake online profiles which in turn are being used for spam, fraud, and disinformation campaigns. As the general problem of detecting any type of manipulated or synthesized content is receiving increasing attention, here we focus on a more narrow task of distinguishing a real face from an AI-generated face. This is particularly applicable when tackling inauthentic online accounts with a fake user profile photo. We show that by focusing on only faces, a more resilient and general-purpose artifact can be detected that allows for the detection of AI-generated faces from a variety of GAN- and diffusion-based synthesis engines, and across image resolutions (as low as 128 x 128 pixels) and qualities.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- AI-generated images are being used to create fake online profiles, leading to spam, fraud, and disinformation campaigns
- Researchers focus on distinguishing real faces from AI-generated faces, which is particularly relevant for detecting inauthentic online accounts with fake profile photos
- The proposed method can detect AI-generated faces from various synthesis engines, even at low resolutions and qualities
Plain English Explanation
Artificial intelligence (AI) has made incredible progress in generating realistic-looking images, and these AI-generated images are now being used to create fake online profiles. These fake profiles are then used to spread spam, fraud, and misinformation online.
To address this issue, researchers have focused on a specific task: distinguishing real faces from AI-generated faces. This is particularly important when trying to detect inauthentic online accounts that use AI-generated profile photos. The researchers have developed a method that can reliably detect AI-generated faces, even if they are of low quality or resolution. This means the method can be used to identify fake online profiles, helping to combat the spread of spam, fraud, and disinformation.
Technical Explanation
The researchers have developed a technique that can effectively distinguish real faces from AI-generated faces. This is a more targeted approach compared to the general problem of detecting any type of manipulated or synthesized content.
By focusing specifically on faces, the researchers have created a more resilient and general-purpose artifact that can detect AI-generated faces from a variety of Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and diffusion-based synthesis engines. Their method can identify these AI-generated faces even at low resolutions (as low as 128 x 128 pixels) and across different image qualities.
This approach is particularly relevant for identifying inauthentic online accounts with fake user profile photos. By focusing on the faces, the researchers have developed a more robust and versatile tool for detecting AI-generated content, which can help combat the spread of spam, fraud, and disinformation on online platforms.
Critical Analysis
The researchers have acknowledged that the general problem of detecting manipulated or synthesized content is a complex and challenging task. While their approach focuses on a narrower task of distinguishing real faces from AI-generated faces, they have demonstrated that this can be a valuable tool for addressing the issue of fake online profiles and the associated spread of harmful content.
One potential limitation of the research is that it may not be able to detect more sophisticated or advanced AI-generated faces that are designed to evade detection. Additionally, the researchers have not explored the potential for adversarial attacks or ways in which the AI-generation models could be further improved to bypass their detection method.
Further research in this area could explore ways to make the detection method more robust and adaptable, as well as investigate the broader societal implications of AI-generated content and the challenges it poses for maintaining online authenticity and trust.
Conclusion
This research represents an important step in addressing the growing problem of AI-generated images being used to create fake online profiles and spread spam, fraud, and disinformation. By focusing on the detection of AI-generated faces, the researchers have developed a more targeted and resilient approach that can be used to identify inauthentic online accounts. While there are still challenges and limitations to be addressed, this work highlights the importance of continued research and development in this critical area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
AI-Generated Faces in the Real World: A Large-Scale Case Study of Twitter Profile Images
Jonas Ricker, Dennis Assenmacher, Thorsten Holz, Asja Fischer, Erwin Quiring
0
0
Recent advances in the field of generative artificial intelligence (AI) have blurred the lines between authentic and machine-generated content, making it almost impossible for humans to distinguish between such media. One notable consequence is the use of AI-generated images for fake profiles on social media. While several types of disinformation campaigns and similar incidents have been reported in the past, a systematic analysis has been lacking. In this work, we conduct the first large-scale investigation of the prevalence of AI-generated profile pictures on Twitter. We tackle the challenges of a real-world measurement study by carefully integrating various data sources and designing a multi-stage detection pipeline. Our analysis of nearly 15 million Twitter profile pictures shows that 0.052% were artificially generated, confirming their notable presence on the platform. We comprehensively examine the characteristics of these accounts and their tweet content, and uncover patterns of coordinated inauthentic behavior. The results also reveal several motives, including spamming and political amplification campaigns. Our research reaffirms the need for effective detection and mitigation strategies to cope with the potential negative effects of generative AI in the future.
4/23/2024
🔍
How to Distinguish AI-Generated Images from Authentic Photographs
Negar Kamali, Karyn Nakamura, Angelos Chatzimparmpas, Jessica Hullman, Matthew Groh
0
0
The high level of photorealism in state-of-the-art diffusion models like Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, and Firefly makes it difficult for untrained humans to distinguish between real photographs and AI-generated images. To address this problem, we designed a guide to help readers develop a more critical eye toward identifying artifacts, inconsistencies, and implausibilities that often appear in AI-generated images. The guide is organized into five categories of artifacts and implausibilities: anatomical, stylistic, functional, violations of physics, and sociocultural. For this guide, we generated 138 images with diffusion models, curated 9 images from social media, and curated 42 real photographs. These images showcase the kinds of cues that prompt suspicion towards the possibility an image is AI-generated and why it is often difficult to draw conclusions about an image's provenance without any context beyond the pixels in an image. Human-perceptible artifacts are not always present in AI-generated images, but this guide reveals artifacts and implausibilities that often emerge. By drawing attention to these kinds of artifacts and implausibilities, we aim to better equip people to distinguish AI-generated images from real photographs in the future.
6/14/2024
Harnessing Machine Learning for Discerning AI-Generated Synthetic Images
Yuyang Wang, Yizhi Hao, Amando Xu Cong
0
0
In the realm of digital media, the advent of AI-generated synthetic images has introduced significant challenges in distinguishing between real and fabricated visual content. These images, often indistinguishable from authentic ones, pose a threat to the credibility of digital media, with potential implications for disinformation and fraud. Our research addresses this challenge by employing machine learning techniques to discern between AI-generated and genuine images. Central to our approach is the CIFAKE dataset, a comprehensive collection of images labeled as Real and Fake. We refine and adapt advanced deep learning architectures like ResNet, VGGNet, and DenseNet, utilizing transfer learning to enhance their precision in identifying synthetic images. We also compare these with a baseline model comprising a vanilla Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a custom Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The experimental results were significant, demonstrating that our optimized deep learning models outperform traditional methods, with DenseNet achieving an accuracy of 97.74%. Our application study contributes by applying and optimizing these advanced models for synthetic image detection, conducting a comparative analysis using various metrics, and demonstrating their superior capability in identifying AI-generated images over traditional machine learning techniques. This research not only advances the field of digital media integrity but also sets a foundation for future explorations into the ethical and technical dimensions of AI-generated content in digital media.
5/27/2024
A Large-scale Universal Evaluation Benchmark For Face Forgery Detection
Yijun Bei, Hengrui Lou, Jinsong Geng, Erteng Liu, Lechao Cheng, Jie Song, Mingli Song, Zunlei Feng
0
0
With the rapid development of AI-generated content (AIGC) technology, the production of realistic fake facial images and videos that deceive human visual perception has become possible. Consequently, various face forgery detection techniques have been proposed to identify such fake facial content. However, evaluating the effectiveness and generalizability of these detection techniques remains a significant challenge. To address this, we have constructed a large-scale evaluation benchmark called DeepFaceGen, aimed at quantitatively assessing the effectiveness of face forgery detection and facilitating the iterative development of forgery detection technology. DeepFaceGen consists of 776,990 real face image/video samples and 773,812 face forgery image/video samples, generated using 34 mainstream face generation techniques. During the construction process, we carefully consider important factors such as content diversity, fairness across ethnicities, and availability of comprehensive labels, in order to ensure the versatility and convenience of DeepFaceGen. Subsequently, DeepFaceGen is employed in this study to evaluate and analyze the performance of 13 mainstream face forgery detection techniques from various perspectives. Through extensive experimental analysis, we derive significant findings and propose potential directions for future research. The code and dataset for DeepFaceGen are available at https://github.com/HengruiLou/DeepFaceGen.
6/17/2024