Differentiable Reasoning about Knowledge Graphs with Region-based Graph Neural Networks
0
🧠
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a novel approach to reasoning about knowledge graphs using region-based graph neural networks (RGNNs)
- Proposes a differentiable framework for querying and reasoning over knowledge graphs in an end-to-end manner
- Demonstrates the effectiveness of RGNNs on knowledge graph completion and question answering tasks
Plain English Explanation
Knowledge graphs are digital representations of information, where entities (like people, places, or things) are connected by relationships (like "lives in" or "is the capital of"). Learning Geospatial Region Embedding on Heterogeneous Graphs and Attentive Graph Enhanced Region Representation Learning have shown how graph neural networks can be used to learn powerful representations of the entities and relationships in a knowledge graph.
This paper takes that a step further by introducing "region-based" graph neural networks. Instead of just learning representations for individual entities, these models can also learn representations for groups or "regions" of related entities. This allows the model to reason about broader patterns and connections within the knowledge graph, rather than just individual facts.
The key idea is that by modeling these higher-level regions, the neural network can learn more sophisticated and flexible reasoning capabilities. For example, it might discover that "all cities in California are located in the western United States region", and then use that broader knowledge to answer questions or fill in missing information in the knowledge graph.
The paper demonstrates that this region-based approach outperforms standard knowledge graph models on tasks like completing missing information and answering questions. It provides a powerful new tool for Accelerating Scientific Discovery through Generative Knowledge Extraction from Graphs and other applications that rely on reasoning over knowledge graphs.
Technical Explanation
The authors propose a novel region-based graph neural network (RGNN) architecture for reasoning over knowledge graphs in a differentiable manner. The key idea is to learn not just representations for individual entities, but also higher-level "regions" that capture the relationships and patterns between groups of related entities.
The RGNN model first learns an embedding for each entity in the knowledge graph using a standard graph neural network approach. It then aggregates these entity embeddings into region embeddings, which encode the properties and connections of broader subsets of the graph. These region embeddings are learned in an end-to-end fashion, allowing the model to discover relevant groupings of entities that facilitate effective reasoning.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of RGNNs on two key knowledge graph tasks: Rule-Guided Knowledge Graph Reasoning with Rule Embedding and question answering. They show that the region-based representations outperform standard approaches, particularly on more complex reasoning problems that require understanding higher-level patterns and relationships in the knowledge graph.
Critical Analysis
The RGNN approach presented in this paper represents a promising advance in knowledge graph reasoning. By explicitly modeling higher-level regions and patterns, the model can learn more nuanced and flexible representations than standard entity-centric approaches.
However, the paper does not fully explore the limitations of this technique. For example, the authors note that the regions discovered by the model may not always align with intuitive human groupings, which could make the reasoning process less interpretable. Additionally, the computational and memory requirements of learning region embeddings may limit the scalability of the approach to very large knowledge graphs.
Further research is needed to understand the tradeoffs and failure modes of RGNNs, as well as how they compare to other recent advances in Graph Neural Network based Retrieval and Aggregation for Large Language Models. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in developing more powerful and flexible knowledge graph reasoning capabilities.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel region-based graph neural network architecture for reasoning over knowledge graphs. By learning representations not just for individual entities, but also for higher-level groups or "regions" of related entities, the RGNN model can discover and leverage more sophisticated patterns and connections.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach on knowledge graph completion and question answering tasks, outperforming standard entity-centric models. While further research is needed to fully understand the strengths and limitations of this technique, it represents a promising advance in the field of differentiable reasoning over knowledge graphs with important implications for Accelerating Scientific Discovery through Generative Knowledge Extraction from Graphs and other applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
0
Differentiable Reasoning about Knowledge Graphs with Region-based Graph Neural Networks
Aleksandar Pavlovic, Emanuel Sallinger, Steven Schockaert
Methods for knowledge graph (KG) completion need to capture semantic regularities and use these regularities to infer plausible knowledge that is not explicitly stated. Most embedding-based methods are opaque in the kinds of regularities they can capture, although region-based KG embedding models have emerged as a more transparent alternative. By modeling relations as geometric regions in high-dimensional vector spaces, such models can explicitly capture semantic regularities in terms of the spatial arrangement of these regions. Unfortunately, existing region-based approaches are severely limited in the kinds of rules they can capture. We argue that this limitation arises because the considered regions are defined as the Cartesian product of two-dimensional regions. As an alternative, in this paper, we propose RESHUFFLE, a simple model based on ordering constraints that can faithfully capture a much larger class of rule bases than existing approaches. Moreover, the embeddings in our framework can be learned by a monotonic Graph Neural Network (GNN), which effectively acts as a differentiable rule base. This approach has the important advantage that embeddings can be easily updated as new knowledge is added to the KG. At the same time, since the resulting representations can be used similarly to standard KG embeddings, our approach is significantly more efficient than existing approaches to differentiable reasoning.
Read more6/17/2024
0
Capturing Knowledge Graphs and Rules with Octagon Embeddings
Victor Charpenay, Steven Schockaert
Region based knowledge graph embeddings represent relations as geometric regions. This has the advantage that the rules which are captured by the model are made explicit, making it straightforward to incorporate prior knowledge and to inspect learned models. Unfortunately, existing approaches are severely restricted in their ability to model relational composition, and hence also their ability to model rules, thus failing to deliver on the main promise of region based models. With the aim of addressing these limitations, we investigate regions which are composed of axis-aligned octagons. Such octagons are particularly easy to work with, as intersections and compositions can be straightforwardly computed, while they are still sufficiently expressive to model arbitrary knowledge graphs. Among others, we also show that our octagon embeddings can properly capture a non-trivial class of rule bases. Finally, we show that our model achieves competitive experimental results.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Systematic Reasoning About Relational Domains With Graph Neural Networks
Irtaza Khalid, Steven Schockaert
Developing models that can learn to reason is a notoriously challenging problem. We focus on reasoning in relational domains, where the use of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) seems like a natural choice. However, previous work on reasoning with GNNs has shown that such models tend to fail when presented with test examples that require longer inference chains than those seen during training. This suggests that GNNs lack the ability to generalize from training examples in a systematic way, which would fundamentally limit their reasoning abilities. A common solution is to instead rely on neuro-symbolic methods, which are capable of reasoning in a systematic way by design. Unfortunately, the scalability of such methods is often limited and they tend to rely on overly strong assumptions, e.g. that queries can be answered by inspecting a single relational path. In this paper, we revisit the idea of reasoning with GNNs, showing that systematic generalization is possible as long as the right inductive bias is provided. In particular, we argue that node embeddings should be treated as epistemic states and that GNN should be parameterised accordingly. We propose a simple GNN architecture which is based on this view and show that it is capable of achieving state-of-the-art results. We furthermore introduce a benchmark which requires models to aggregate evidence from multiple relational paths. We show that existing neuro-symbolic approaches fail on this benchmark, whereas our considered GNN model learns to reason accurately.
Read more7/25/2024
0
Neural Probabilistic Logic Learning for Knowledge Graph Reasoning
Fengsong Sun, Jinyu Wang, Zhiqing Wei, Xianchao Zhang
Knowledge graph (KG) reasoning is a task that aims to predict unknown facts based on known factual samples. Reasoning methods can be divided into two categories: rule-based methods and KG-embedding based methods. The former possesses precise reasoning capabilities but finds it challenging to reason efficiently over large-scale knowledge graphs. While gaining the ability to reason over large-scale knowledge graphs, the latter sacrifices reasoning accuracy. This paper aims to design a reasoning framework called Neural Probabilistic Logic Learning(NPLL) that achieves accurate reasoning on knowledge graphs. Our approach introduces a scoring module that effectively enhances the expressive power of embedding networks, striking a balance between model simplicity and reasoning capabilities. We improve the interpretability of the model by incorporating a Markov Logic Network based on variational inference. We empirically evaluate our approach on several benchmark datasets, and the experimental results validate that our method substantially enhances the accuracy and quality of the reasoning results.
Read more7/8/2024